Connect with us

News

Startup Battlefield 200 applications close May 27

info

Published

on

54105085427 2cae9d0502 o.jpg

Your shot at VC access, global visibility, TechCrunch coverage, and $100,000 in equity-free funding is gone in a week.

Startup Battlefield 200 applications close May 27. If you’re building a breakout startup — or know a founder who is — this is the moment to act.

Apply today for the opportunity to take the stage at TechCrunch Disrupt 2026, October 13-15, alongside 200 of the world’s most promising early-stage startups.

TechCrunch Startup Battlefield 200 2023
Image Credits:Kimberly White / Getty Images

The clock is ticking for early-stage founders

Pre-Series A founders, consider this your final countdown reminder: the strongest startups are already entering the arena, and the application window is closing fast.

If your startup has already been nominated, don’t wait to complete your application. This final week moves quickly, and last-minute submissions risk getting buried as applications surge ahead of the deadline.

Know a startup that deserves the spotlight? Nominate them now so they still have time to apply before May 27.

The companies that define categories rarely start polished

Some of the most consequential companies in tech history didn’t launch with splashy fundraising announcements. They started with a pitch.

Dropbox demoed to a room full of skeptics. Cloudflare took the stage before most people understood what edge networking meant. Discord was still a scrappy gaming startup called Hammer & Chisel.

TechCrunch Disrupt 2025 Startup Battlefield
Image Credits:TechCrunch

They all passed through the same crucible: Startup Battlefield 200. That’s not a coincidence — it’s a pattern. And it starts with an application.

Startup Battlefield 200 has never been a competition for the most polished companies. It’s a competition for the most promising ones. Pre-launch is fine. No revenue is fine. What matters is whether what you’re building genuinely changes something — not incrementally, but meaningfully.

If you or a founder you know is building something impactful, then the application itself becomes the first pitch. Apply before May 27.

More than a pitch competition

Startup Battlefield 200 is where breakout companies get discovered.

Selected startups will showcase live on the Disrupt Stage in front of 10,000+ attendees, leading VCs, global media, and the broader TechCrunch audience. This is your opportunity to gain investor exposure, receive direct VC feedback, and prove your company belongs among the next generation of category-defining startups.

Every one of the 200 selected companies receives:

  • A fully funded three-day exhibition booth at Disrupt
  • Founder masterclasses with world-class VCs and operators
  • A featured startup profile in the event app
  • Press list access and lead-generation opportunities
  • Opportunities for TechCrunch editorial coverage, podcasts, and speaking appearances as the company grows

And every selected company pitches, whether on the Disrupt Stage or the Pitch Showcase Stage. Both put founders in front of the investors, media, and partners who attend Disrupt specifically to find what’s next.

You don’t need to make the top 20 for this experience to change your trajectory. Get started by nominating and applying here.

The Startup Battlefield 200 track record speaks for itself

More than 1,700 companies have competed in Startup Battlefield 200. Together, they’ve raised over $32 billion and generated more than 250 exits, including acquisitions by Microsoft, Google, Salesforce, Uber, and Amazon.

The network runs so deep that alumni have even acquired each other: Dropbox acquired fellow Battlefield 200 alum DocSend in 2021.

This is also the same launchpad that helped accelerate companies like Fitbit, Trello, and Mint.

Behind every one of those outcomes was a founder willing to make a bet on themselves publicly, in front of people who were paying attention. Apply and learn more here.

Who should apply?

We’re looking for ambitious early-stage startups building innovative, potentially category-defining products.

Applications are open globally across all industries. Most selected companies are pre-Series A, though select Series A startups may qualify on a case-by-case basis.

To apply, startups should have:

  • Founders with vision, execution, and real traction

Thousands apply every year. Only 200 are selected. Just 20 finalists pitch live on the Disrupt Stage. One startup takes the crown and wins $100,000 in equity-free funding.

One week left to make your move

The founders who wait until they feel ready often wait too long. You do not need to be polished. You need to be promising.

If you’ve been sitting on this, here’s the reality: the worst outcome is you don’t get selected this cycle — and you come back next year with a stronger application because you went through the process.

The stage matters. The community lasts. The milestone is real. But the deadline is now one week away.

If you’re building something category-defining — or know a startup that deserves the spotlight — submit your nomination and complete your application before May 27.

Startup Battlefield 200 2026
Image Credits:TechCrunch

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Atiku, Obi: Rufai Oseni urges Tinubu to be cautious with Wike

info

Published

on

By

Rufai Oseni.jpeg

Arise Television anchor, Rufai Oseni, has cautioned President Bola Tinubu to be wary of his political relationship with the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, FCT, Nyesom Wike.

Oseni spoke while reacting to Wike’s recent claim that he would become a major target of opposition politicians, including former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi, if President Tinubu fails to secure re-election in 2027.

Wike made the remark during a media chat in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, on Wednesday, where he defended his continued support for Tinubu’s second-term ambition despite being a member of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP.

Reacting during Arise Television’s The Morning Show on Thursday, Oseni questioned why Wike was allegedly concerned about being witch-hunted by Atiku or Obi.

Recommended

According to him, Wike should have nothing to fear if he was confident that his actions had been justified.

“So why is Mr Wike afraid today? Why is he afraid that if Atiku Abubakar gets in, he’s going to be witch-hunted? 

“Is it because he prevented Atiku from campaigning in Rivers State?” Oseni said.

“I don’t have problems with him not accepting to support Atiku, but what I have problems with is that he used his high-handedness as governor to ensure that Atiku did not campaign in Rivers State.

“Why is he thinking Peter Obi will witch-hunt him? Oh, is it because, like the BBC revealed, what Obi got on the IReV was more than any person in that election, and we saw what was declared because he has his hand over it.

“Mr Wike, why are you scared? Why do you think they will witch-hunt you? Is there anything you want to tell us? Because if you are proud of your actions, you should not fear a witch hunt.”

Oseni also warned Tinubu to be cautious in his dealings with Wike, arguing that the former Rivers State governor could publicly disclose details of their political relationship if they eventually fall out.

He said Wike had a history of falling out with former political allies and associates.

“You see, for all of those that do things with him, in all of this, the person I pity the most, and I have a very great pity for, is President Tinubu, because you see how Wike is revealing everything now.

“The day he quickly falls out with President Tinubu, this Wike will talk, and he will talk very well.

“So, Babami, President Tinubu, I hope whatever you are doing with Wike are things that we can say in public. I’m just begging for posterity’s sake, because it is the height of delusion for President Tinubu to think that whatever ‘padi padi’ he is doing with Wike, if they are no longer together, Wike will not talk,” he said.

Oseni further referenced Wike’s past political comments against godfatherism, including his criticism of Tinubu during the political crisis involving former Lagos State Governor Akinwunmi Ambode.

“This was the same Wike, if you remember, when Ambode was going back and forth with President Tinubu, he told him that we don’t allow godfathers in Rivers.

“You were talking to President Tinubu then, now you people are aligning. Congratulations to you, because I’m saying this from experience,” he added.

Oseni said he knew some people who were once close to Wike but were no longer on speaking terms with him, warning the President to be careful in his relationship with the FCT minister.

Wike has been locked in a prolonged political battle with Atiku since the 2022 PDP presidential primary, which the former vice president won ahead of the then Rivers State governor.

Continue Reading

News

DSS DG Reveals What Fuels Terrorism, Insurgency in Nigeria

info

Published

on

By

20260903 081334 1200x675.jpg

The Director-General of the Department of State Services (DSS), Oluwatosin Ajayi, has identified the factors helping terrorism and insurgency to thrive in Nigeria.

Ajayi said criminal groups have taken advantage of places where government presence is limited, turning such locations into safe havens for kidnapping, terrorism and other violent crimes.

The DSS boss made the remarks in a wide-ranging interview made available to POLITICS NIGERIA, as he marked two years in office and the 40th anniversary of the domestic intelligence agency.

Ajayi, who has spent 36 years in the Service, said Nigeria’s security challenges cannot be properly addressed by looking at them through ethnic or religious lenses.

He stressed that criminality should be treated as criminality, regardless of the identity of those involved.

“There should not be ethnic colouration to crime. We cannot criminalise a race or paint a whole ethnic group with one brush,” he said.

According to him, Nigeria has experienced different forms of criminality in various parts of the country over the years. He cited the kidnapping crisis in the South-East and South-South between 2003 and 2007, the activities of notorious armed robbers and the emergence of groups such as Maitatsine and Kalakato.

He said the nature of insecurity has changed over time, with criminal networks increasingly taking advantage of local grievances and difficult terrain.

Ajayi specifically linked some of the violence in Benue and Plateau states to longstanding disputes over access to land and resources between farming communities and Fulani neighbours.

He said the situation became more complicated after local criminal groups and terrorists affiliated with international organisations became involved.

“The problems in Benue and Plateau are age-long. It started as a dispute over access to land resources between native farmers, most of whom are Christians, and their Fulani neighbours, the majority of whom incidentally are Muslims,” Ajayi said.

“Over time, local criminal groups, including terrorists who pledged allegiance to international terrorist organisations, got involved, mainly to further their sinister agenda.”

The DSS chief also pointed to what he described as a loss of values and the decline of governance in remote areas as a major part of the problem.

He explained that communities that once had some form of government presence and local security structures are now left vulnerable.

“What has changed is the loss of our values,” he said.

Ajayi recalled that in earlier years, government structures extended into rural areas through institutions such as native authorities and forest guards.

He said the gradual disappearance of such structures created spaces where criminals could operate with less resistance.

“At that time, some form of governance was extended to those remote areas: native authorities, the Regional Forest Guard Law of 1956, then the State Controlled Land Use Act and Forests Act of 1978,” he said.

“However, today there is no presence of governance in those places, leaving them as ungoverned spaces for criminals to keep victims of kidnapping.”

The DSS boss said the revival of forest guards is therefore important because security agencies operating at the federal level may not always have the local knowledge needed to respond quickly to threats in difficult terrain.

He also mentioned the government’s push for state police and stronger community-based security arrangements as part of the broader response to Nigeria’s security challenges.

According to him, the country’s geographical realities make a single security approach inadequate.

He cited the Lake Chad area, the Sahel region and the creeks of the Niger Delta as examples of difficult environments that require security personnel to understand the local terrain.

Ajayi said intelligence remains critical, but intelligence alone cannot automatically prevent every attack.

He acknowledged that terrorist attacks and kidnappings still occur despite the work of security agencies.

“I want to anchor on the fact that we recognise that attacks are still happening, which tends to diminish our efforts,” he said.

“For instance, somebody whose child was kidnapped doesn’t care if you prevented 200 attacks. For that person, you haven’t achieved anything. Premised on that, I acknowledge we need to do more.”

He added that no intelligence agency anywhere in the world can completely eliminate crime.

The DSS director-general said the objective should instead be to reduce criminal activities to the barest minimum while improving the capacity of security agencies to respond to threats.

He also highlighted the importance of addressing the conditions that allow extremist groups and criminal organisations to recruit and operate.

According to Ajayi, one of the principles guiding his administration at the DSS is the reduction of grievances within society.

He explained that the Service considers people its most important intelligence asset because members of the public provide information that technology alone cannot replace.

“Human intelligence is more valuable than any technology because people can provide context, answer questions, and be engaged repeatedly in ways machines cannot,” he said.

“When people trust you, they are more willing to work with you.”

Ajayi said this thinking informed some of the reforms introduced under his leadership, including compensation for people affected by operational mistakes and efforts to improve relations between the DSS and communities.

He said the Service had paid more than N300 million in compensation in various cases involving people who were wrongfully arrested, detained or affected during operations.

One of the cases involved a Jos businessman who was mistakenly shot during an operation. Ajayi said a court had awarded him N10 million in 2016, but the compensation was not paid at the time.

After becoming DSS director-general, Ajayi said he ordered a review of cases involving operational mistakes.

He said the victim later received an additional N10 million and medical assistance after an assessment showed that his condition had worsened.

The DSS chief said the objective was not only to comply with court orders but also to help victims rebuild their lives.

He also disclosed that the agency had released and supported other people who were found to have been wrongly detained after investigations.

The approach, according to Ajayi, is connected to the agency’s wider effort to build public confidence and encourage Nigerians to provide intelligence.

He said people who feel abandoned or unfairly treated may be reluctant to share information with security agencies, even when such information could help prevent attacks.

ISWAP Terrorists
ISWAP Terrorists

The DSS chief therefore described the reduction of social grievances as an important part of counterterrorism.

He said this also explains the agency’s attention to vulnerable groups, including people raised in orphanages.

Ajayi said some people who grew up in orphanages had previously been recruited into the DSS and performed well.

He explained that the initiative was not based on viewing orphans as security threats but on ensuring that vulnerable Nigerians were not forgotten.

The DSS boss also defended the agency’s growing focus on legal processes and human rights.

He said his administration had directed officers not to use arrest as a response to civil disputes.

According to him, where disagreements arise, the DSS can approach the courts rather than resort to force.

He said the same principle applies to the media, insisting that journalists should not be treated as criminals simply because of reports that the Service considers inaccurate.

Ajayi said the DSS now prefers corrections, dialogue and legal action where necessary.

His comments come at a time when the Federal Government is pushing for stronger community-based responses to insecurity, including discussions around state police and forest guards.

The DSS chief said such measures could help address gaps created by difficult terrain and limited government presence in remote communities.

He maintained that the fight against terrorism requires more than military operations.

For Ajayi, effective security must combine intelligence, law enforcement, community cooperation, justice and efforts to reduce the grievances that criminals can exploit.

He also urged Nigerians to avoid ethnicising insecurity, saying criminals exist across different ethnic and religious groups.

“Politics has not ruined Nigeria. It is only bad politicians in pursuit of their ambitions who threaten the stability of Nigeria,” he said.

Ajayi further called for collective action against terrorism and urged Nigerians to support the “United Against Terror” campaign.

He said terrorists benefit when their activities receive widespread publicity and suggested that greater unity among citizens would make it harder for political actors or criminal groups to exploit insecurity for their own interests.

The DSS director-general acknowledged that much remains to be done despite the agency’s intelligence operations and recent reforms.

He said the continued occurrence of attacks means security agencies must keep improving their methods.

 

Continue Reading

Trending