Algeria has become the sixth African nation to exit the 2026 FIFA World Cup after suffering a 2-0 defeat to Switzerland in the Round of 32, deepening the continent’s disappointing run in the knockout stage.
The North Africans were outclassed by a disciplined Swiss side, with Breel Embolo and Dan Ndoye scoring to send Switzerland into the Round of 16 while ending Algeria’s impressive World Cup campaign.
Algeria’s elimination continues a worrying trend for Africa after a record-breaking group-stage performance that saw nine of the continent’s 10 representatives qualify for the knockout rounds.
However, the Round of 32 has proved disastrous for African teams.
Senegal were edged 3-2 by Belgium after extra time, Ivory Coast fell 2-1 to Norway, DR Congo lost 2-1 to England, while South Africa suffered a heartbreaking 1-0 defeat to Canada.
Tunisia had already exited the competition during the group stage after finishing bottom of their group.
With six African nations now out of the tournament, hopes of a deep continental run rest on the remaining four teams.
Morocco have already secured their place in the Round of 16 after defeating the Netherlands in a penalty shootout and remain Africa’s only confirmed representative in the next round.
Attention now turns to Egypt, Ghana and Cape Verde, who are yet to play their Round of 32 fixtures.
Egypt face Australia, Ghana take on Colombia, while Cape Verde have a daunting clash against defending champions Argentina.
Victories for any of the three nations would boost Africa’s presence in the Round of 16 and keep alive hopes of surpassing the continent’s previous best performances at the FIFA World Cup.
After an historic group-stage campaign, Africa will now be counting on Egypt, Ghana and Cape Verde to carry the continent’s ambitions forward as the Round of 32 stage will end this weekend .
Former National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress, Abdullahi Umar Ganduje, has dismissed reports that he has defected to the Nigeria Democratic Congress, NDC, insisting that he remains a committed member of the APC.
Ganduje described as false and politically motivated the posters circulating on social media alleging that he had left the ruling party.
He said, “The claims were part of a deliberate misinformation campaign aimed at misleading the public, creating confusion among APC supporters, and generating unnecessary political speculation.”
In a statement issued by his former Commissioner for Information and Chief of Staff, Muhammad Garba, the former Kano State governor stressed that $he has never considered leaving the APC, a party he once led as National Chairman”.
He maintained that reports linking him to the NDC lack both political and logical basis.
Ganduje further stated that the APC remains the country’s largest political party and continues to gain support under the leadership of President Bola Tinubu.
He reaffirmed his commitment to working with the party’s leadership to advance the President Bola Tinubu administration’s Renewed Hope Agenda.
The former APC chairman also revealed that those responsible for producing and circulating the alleged defection posters had been identified. He warned that legal action would be taken if the materials were not withdrawn and the spread of the claims did not stop immediately.
He urged party members, supporters and the general public to disregard the posters, insisting that they do not reflect his political position or intentions.
DP
Read this in the Daily Post appFaster, cleaner, breaking-news alerts.
BY SUNDAY SAMUEL—The High Court of Kaduna State has again dismissed an application for bail filed by the former Governor of Kaduna State, Mallam Nasir Ahmad El-Rufai, in the ongoing criminal proceedings instituted against him by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC).
Honourable Justice D. H. Khobo delivered a considered ruling on 29th June 2026 on the defendant’s third application for bail, this time on medical grounds.
A central issue considered by the Court was the medical report relied upon by Mallam El-Rufai in support of his application.
The report, annexed to the application as Exhibit “A” and purportedly issued by the National Hospital, Abuja, claimed that the former Governor had been diagnosed with an advanced metastatic prostate cancer requiring a specialised treatment said to be unavailable anywhere in Nigeria.
In opposing the application, the ICPC presented documentary evidence from the Chief Medical Director of the National Hospital, Abuja, Professor Muhammad Raji Mahmud, disclaiming the document relied upon by the defendant.
According to the document from the National Hospital issued by the Chief Medical Director, a comprehensive search of the hospital’s electronic medical records and patient indexes revealed no hospital number, patient file, billing record, consultation history, or any evidence that the defendant had ever been treated at the facility.
The hospital further confirmed that the report was issued without the knowledge or authorisation of its management.
Relying on this evidence, the Court held that the credibility and reliability of the medical report had been fundamentally undermined, and that a document formally disowned by the very institution on whose letterhead it was issued could not serve as the foundation for the exceptional relief sought by the applicant.
With the collapse of that evidentiary foundation, the Court found no reliable and institutionally validated material facts to justify the exercise of judicial discretion in favour of bail on health grounds.
In refusing the application, the Court also ordered that the Commission shall continue to provide the defendant with unrestricted access to his personal medical physicians and shall ensure that he is escorted to any specialised diagnostic or clinical facility of his choice within Nigeria as required, throughout the pendency of the trial.
The Commission notes that this order is consistent with its existing practice and reaffirms its commitment to full compliance.
The ICPC welcomes the Court’s ruling as a reaffirmation of the principle that applications for bail on medical grounds must be supported by credible and verifiable evidence and determined strictly in accordance with the law.
The Commission remains committed to conducting all investigations and prosecutions with professionalism, fairness and respect for the rule of law, while ensuring that every person brought before the courts is accorded all rights guaranteed under the Constitution and other applicable laws.