Connect with us

News

NIGERIA HAS LOST ITS WOMEN’S FOOTBALL ADVANTAGE — AND AFRICA IS CATCHING UP FAST

info

Published

on

IMG 20260814 WA0000.jpg

For more than three decades, Nigeria’s Super Falcons were the standard of African women’s football.

Ten Women’s Africa Cup of Nations titles. Every FIFA Women’s World Cup from the beginning of the competition. Generations of players who dominated the continent.

Read Also: 14th Women AFCON: Swart’s heroics foil Super Falcons’ search for World Cup ticket

But that era has now reached a disturbing turning point.

For the first time in the history of the FIFA Women’s World Cup, Nigeria will not be at the tournament.

South Africa’s 2–1 victory over the Super Falcons in Casablanca on Thursday ended Nigeria’s final route to the 2027 World Cup.

But perhaps this should not be viewed simply as a failure of the Super Falcons.

Perhaps it is the clearest evidence yet that the rest of Africa has finally caught up.

Look at Malawi.

The Scorchers were appearing at the WAFCON for the first time in 2026. They did not come merely to make up the numbers. They reached the semi-finals and secured Malawi’s historic first-ever Women’s World Cup qualification.

Look at Morocco.

The country has invested heavily in women’s football, and AS FAR has become a continental force, winning the CAF Women’s Champions League in 2025 and earning the right to represent Africa at FIFA’s inaugural Women’s Champions Cup.

Look at South Africa.

Banyana Banyana have transformed themselves from challengers into African champions and have now defeated Nigeria when a World Cup place was on the line.

And across the continent, CAF says women’s football is being strengthened through coaching education, better administration, grassroots development, refereeing and more structured domestic leagues.

This is the part Nigerians must understand.

Africa did not wait for Nigeria to remain dominant.

Other countries started building.

For years, Nigeria had an enormous advantage because many of our best players grew up playing together for long periods, particularly through the domestic system and national-team pathways.

The Super Falcons of previous generations were not simply eleven talented Nigerians assembled for a tournament.

They were products of a football culture that continuously produced players.

Today, that advantage is much smaller.

And there is another uncomfortable reality: Nigerian players are increasingly finding opportunities in women’s leagues outside Nigeria, while African leagues are becoming more organised and competitive.

CAF’s Women’s Champions League has also created a continental platform with meaningful financial rewards; participating clubs received at least $150,000 in the 2024 edition, while the winners received $600,000.

So perhaps the question is no longer:

“Why did the Super Falcons fail?”

The bigger question is:

“Why did Nigeria stop developing faster than the countries chasing us?”

We should support the Falcons.

We should respect the players.

We should recognise their achievements.

But we must also recognise what this moment represents.

Nigeria has won ten WAFCON titles. That history is extraordinary.

But history cannot qualify a team for the next World Cup.

Systems do.

Leagues do.

Academies do.

Coaching structures do.

Investment does.

Player development does.

And if Nigeria does not rebuild those foundations, the Super Falcons’ absence from Brazil may not remain a once-in-history event.

THE SUPER FALCONS HAVE NOT SUDDENLY BECOME A BAD TEAM. AFRICA HAS SIMPLY STOPPED WAITING FOR NIGERIA.

The real alarm is not that Nigeria lost to South Africa.

The real alarm is that the countries Nigeria used to look down on are now building football systems capable of defeating Nigeria when it matters most.

This should not be a blame game.

It should be a wake-up call.

NIGERIA DID NOT LOSE WOMEN’S FOOTBALL IN ONE MATCH. WE MAY HAVE BEEN LOSING THE ADVANTAGE FOR YEARS.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Dangote Cement suspends proposed London listing

info

Published

on

1665137623059blob 1620x1080.png

Dangote Cement Plc has put its proposed listing on the London Stock Exchange on hold, citing current market conditions and the company’s strategic priorities.

The company disclosed this in a regulatory filing signed by Edward Imoedemhe, the company secretary, following a meeting of its board of directors on Tuesday.

In May, Dangote Cement announced it was in early talks over a potential London listing, a move that would help widen its access to overseas investors and capital.

The company later, in July, explained that the faster and more practical listing process in the United Kingdom influenced its preference for London over Dubai for the secondary listing.

On Tuesday, the cement producer said it will not proceed with the secondary listing, noting that its shares remain listed on the Nigerian Exchange Group, and that the decision will not affect the company’s operations.

“The Company’s ordinary shares remain listed on the NGX, and this decision does not in any way affect the Company’s operations or business plans,” Dangote Cement added.

PT WHATSAPP CHANNEL
Dangote Refinery AD

READ ALSO: Dangote Cement’s nine-month profit jumps 31% as revenue hits N3.8 trillion

The company said it will remain focused on delivering sustainable value to its shareholders and building on its strong market position.

Dangote Cement is majority-owned by Africa’s richest man, Aliko Dangote, who launched the continent’s largest-ever initial public offering in September for his oil refinery.

Dangote Cement, with a production capacity of 55 million tonnes per annum, has a footprint in 11 African countries, including Cameroon, Ethiopia, Zambia, Tanzania, and Côte d’Ivoire, among others.

The corporation’s nine-month profit in 2026 jumped 31 per cent, while its revenue hit N3.8 trillion, boosted by improved revenue from cement and clinker sales.


Discover more from Premium Times Nigeria

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

News

X launches its own clipping feature to spur influencer engagement

info

Published

on

Twitter x musk graffiti hand.jpg

Over the past few years, X has released a number of features to make itself a friendlier hub for influencers. The latest effort to attract social media talent? Its own clipping tool.

Clipping is the pivotal social media technique by which longer videos are spliced into TikTok-attention-span length “clips” and then strategically posted to engage as many eyeballs (and, thus, derive as much ad revenue) as possible.

On Monday, X announced the tool, which, from what we can tell, appears to be little more than a straightforward video-trimming feature that lets users edit videos and post them to X.

The site says that every clip includes a “Clip from” label that links back to the original video from which it was derived, allowing X users to see more about the creator and the creator’s content.

“Grab your favorite moment from any video, add your take, and post it without leaving X,” the company posted.

The platform added that both creators and clippers can “earn from views on the clip through Original Content Rewards,” X’s rewards program. The program is only available for eligible creators and pays out based on specific levels of audience engagement.

In many cases, influencers pay special firms to handle clipping for them. More and more large companies are also turning to such services to run marketing campaigns, and the technique has been used in political campaigns as well.

Over the last several years, X has tried to compete with other social sites by expanding the kind of content it supports. To take on sites like YouTube, X introduced long-form videos in 2022 (when the site was still known as Twitter), and they have since taken off on the platform. To be more like Substack, it long ago dispensed with the site’s traditional character limits and introduced long-form blog posts, which are available to premium subscribers.

X has kept at it this year. In March, it added a feature called “exclusive threads” that lets creators put parts of a thread behind a paywall so only subscribers can read them, and in July it launched a live-streaming studio and set aside $1 million for creators who go live.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Continue Reading

Trending