The Nigeria Data Protection Commission (NDPC) has launched a forensic investigation into the University of Lagos (UNILAG), Lotus Bank and Hackerbella Ltd over allegations that students’ personal data were collected, processed and disclosed to facilitate the opening of bank accounts without a lawful basis.
The investigation follows public complaints alleging that personal information belonging to affected students was used for financial purposes without an appropriate legal basis or sufficient transparency to the data subjects, according to a statement issued by NDPC seen by Technology Times.
The probe brings the handling of students’ personal information by an educational institution, a financial institution and a technology company under heightened regulatory scrutiny, with the NDPC set to examine how the data were collected, shared, processed and potentially used for profiling or automated decision-making.
Dr Vincent Olatunji, National Commissioner and Chief Executive Officer of the NDPC. Image credit: NDPC.
The NDPC will further scrutinise data-sharing arrangements, the lawful bases relied upon for processing, data minimisation, purpose limitation, retention policies and the technical and organisational measures deployed to safeguard the rights of data subjects.
UNILAG: NDPC orders comprehensive investigation
Vincent Olatunji, National Commissioner and Chief Executive Officer of the NDPC, has directed the Commission’s investigation team to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the circumstances surrounding the alleged collection, use and disclosure of the affected students’ personal data.
The investigation will determine the respective roles and responsibilities of UNILAG, Lotus Bank and Hackerbella in the processing of the students’ information and assess whether their activities complied with obligations imposed by the Nigeria Data Protection Act, 2023.
The Commission will also examine whether the alleged processing created risks to the rights and freedoms of the affected students.
Among the areas under investigation are the parties’ Data Protection Impact Assessments, the lawfulness and transparency of any credit scoring or profiling activities, the use of automated decision-making systems and the adequacy of privacy notices provided to affected individuals.
The NDPC will further scrutinise data-sharing arrangements, the lawful bases relied upon for processing, data minimisation, purpose limitation, retention policies and the technical and organisational measures deployed to safeguard the rights of data subjects.
Credit scoring, profiling face regulatory scrutiny
The investigation could have wider significance for Nigeria’s increasingly interconnected education, financial services and technology sectors because of the NDPC’s focus on credit scoring, profiling and automated decision-making.
The Commission is expected to determine whether any profiling of the affected students occurred and, if so, whether it was carried out lawfully and transparently.
It will also examine whether automated systems were used in making decisions concerning the students and whether the organisations involved provided sufficient information about such processing.
The focus on these areas highlights a growing regulatory concern around the use of personal data in systems that can potentially influence an individual’s access to financial services or other services with significant consequences.
The investigation will also seek to establish how students’ information moved between UNILAG, Lotus Bank and Hackerbella, what purposes the data were originally collected for, and whether subsequent sharing or processing remained within those purposes.
NDPC warns educational institutions
Beyond the specific investigation, the NDPC has issued a broader warning to educational institutions that collect and process the personal information of students, staff and other members of their communities.
The Commission said institutions entrusted with such information have a heightened responsibility to ensure that personal data are processed lawfully, fairly, transparently and securely.
The NDPC consequently warned educational institutions that have yet to comply with its existing data protection compliance directives to do so immediately.
The warning places additional pressure on universities and other educational institutions to strengthen their data governance frameworks, particularly where students’ personal information is shared with banks, fintech companies, technology providers, vendors and other third parties.
Student data handling under spotlight
The investigation also draws attention to the data governance responsibilities of organisations operating across institutional boundaries.
Where universities share student information with external service providers, financial institutions or technology companies, questions around purpose limitation, transparency, security and lawful processing become particularly important.
For students, the case underscores the importance of understanding how personal information collected in an academic environment may subsequently be used, disclosed or processed for purposes beyond education and administration.
The NDPC’s investigation will therefore examine not only the alleged opening of bank accounts but also the broader data-processing chain involving the organisations named in the complaints.
Potential implications for universities, banks and technology companies
The outcome of the investigation could have implications beyond the three organisations named by the NDPC.
A finding of non-compliance could reinforce the need for educational institutions to review how student information is transferred to third parties and the controls governing such transfers.
Financial institutions and technology companies working with universities could also face increased scrutiny over the legal basis for accessing student information, the purposes for which such information is processed, and the safeguards applied when personal data are used in financial or technology-enabled services.
The NDPC’s emphasis on Data Protection Impact Assessments, privacy notices, profiling, automated decision-making, data minimisation and purpose limitation also signals the breadth of the regulatory examination.
However, the investigation itself does not establish that UNILAG, Lotus Bank or Hackerbella breached the Nigeria Data Protection Act. The purpose of the forensic probe is to establish the facts, determine the respective responsibilities of the parties and assess compliance with applicable data protection requirements.
As digital services become increasingly embedded in Nigeria’s education and financial sectors, the case could become an important test of how institutions obtain, share and repurpose personal information belonging to students.
The eventual findings of the NDPC are therefore likely to be closely watched by universities, banks, fintechs, technology providers and students concerned about the lawful use and protection of personal data.
Stay ahead with real-time reports, breaking news, and exclusive insights delivered directly to your phone. Don’t settle for outdated information. Join TECHNOLOGYTIMES NEWS on WhatsApp for 24/7 updates.
Benue State Governor, Rev. Fr. Hyacinth Alia, has received the All Progressives Congress, APC, flag as its governorship candidate for Benue State ahead of the 2027 election during the Tinubu/Shettima rally in Jos over the weekend.
The presentation of the flag by the APC National Chairman, Professor Nentawe Yilwatda, represents a formal affirmation of Governor Alia's recognition and acceptance by the party as its standard-bearer in Benue State for the forthcoming governorship election, as well as an expression of the party's confidence and institutional backing for his second-term bid.
The presentation formed part of the rally's activities, during which APC governorship candidates from across the North-Central region received their respective party flags, reaffirming the party's commitment to its candidates as preparations intensify for the 2027 general elections.
The rally, held at the Zaria Road Stadium, attracted prominent national and regional political leaders, including First Lady Senator Oluremi Tinubu, Senate President Godswill Akpabio, Speaker of the House of Representatives, Rt. Hon. Tajudeen Abbas, APC governors, members of the party's National Working Committee and other stakeholders.
President Tinubu, who led the national delegation to the rally, reiterated his administration's commitment to national development, particularly the restoration of peace and security in communities affected by violence.
He assured the people of Plateau State of the Federal Government's commitment to rebuilding communities affected by insurgency and facilitating the safe return of internally displaced persons to their ancestral homes.
The Vice-President, Senator Kashim Shettima, and Senate President Godswill Akpabio also addressed the gathering, highlighting the administration's development initiatives and calling for support for the APC in the forthcoming elections.
The rally attracted party faithful, supporters, and political stakeholders from across the North-Central region, providing a platform for the party's leadership to reaffirm its commitment to the 2027 electoral process.
Edo State Commissioner for Information, Kassim Afegbua, has criticised the presidential candidate of the African Action Congress, AAC, Omoyele Sowore, describing him as a “public nuisance” and questioning his capacity to build a nationwide political structure.
Afegbua made the remarks during an interview on Arise News while reacting to Sowore’s criticism of President Bola Tinubu following the booing of the President by some youths in Abuja on Friday, November 13, 2026.
Sowore had accused Tinubu of hypocrisy, questioning why the President was now advocating peaceful political campaigns after experiencing hostility during his visit to the Shehu Shagari Central Mosque in Area 1, Garki, Abuja.
The incident occurred shortly after Tinubu attended Juma’at prayers at the mosque, where some youths were heard chanting “Ba ma yi, ba ma so”, a Hausa expression meaning “We don't want you” or “We don't support you”, as his convoy departed.
In a reaction posted on his X account, Sowore questioned the President's silence over alleged attacks on opposition politicians and their supporters across the country.
However, Afegbua dismissed Sowore's comments, arguing that someone aspiring to lead the country should demonstrate maturity, responsibility and decorum in public engagements.
“I don't want to listen to all of Sowore's rants because I see him more as a public nuisance,” the commissioner said.
He added that presidential candidates must understand the responsibility associated with seeking to lead a country of more than 250 million people.
“Leadership is a serious responsibility, and you cannot go around making flippant, ridiculous and reckless statements in the name of presenting yourself as a presidential candidate,” Afegbua stated.
He maintained that political ambition should be accompanied by a reasonable level of discipline, insisting that candidates must conduct themselves in a manner that reflects the position they seek to occupy.
The Edo commissioner also questioned Sowore's political reach, describing him as someone who fills a gap in Nigeria's political aspirations rather than a candidate with the organisational capacity to compete effectively nationwide.
According to Afegbua, establishing a functional political structure across all 774 local government areas would be a major challenge for the AAC presidential candidate.
He, however, acknowledged that politicians like Sowore play a role in expressing public frustration and providing an avenue for citizens to communicate their opinions.
Afegbua also defended Tinubu's call for adequate security for presidential candidates, arguing that the President's statement after the Abuja incident was consistent with an earlier directive to security agencies.
He said Tinubu had, two or three weeks before the mosque incident, instructed the Department of State Services, DSS, and other security agencies to ensure that all presidential candidates received adequate protection.
According to him, the President's latest remarks should therefore not be interpreted as a reaction prompted solely by the hostility he experienced in Abuja.
Afegbua further argued that Tinubu's political background gave him considerable experience in political struggles, noting that the President had faced difficult circumstances during his years in opposition.
He nevertheless stressed that occupying the presidency requires a broader sense of responsibility beyond party interests.
“President Tinubu is not just a member of the party. He's also the leader of the entire country,” he said, adding that the President has demonstrated that every Nigerian belongs, irrespective of political affiliation.