The Nigeria Data Protection Commission (NDPC) has launched a forensic investigation into the University of Lagos (UNILAG), Lotus Bank and Hackerbella Ltd over allegations that students’ personal data were collected, processed and disclosed to facilitate the opening of bank accounts without a lawful basis.
The investigation follows public complaints alleging that personal information belonging to affected students was used for financial purposes without an appropriate legal basis or sufficient transparency to the data subjects, according to a statement issued by NDPC seen by Technology Times.
The probe brings the handling of students’ personal information by an educational institution, a financial institution and a technology company under heightened regulatory scrutiny, with the NDPC set to examine how the data were collected, shared, processed and potentially used for profiling or automated decision-making.
Dr Vincent Olatunji, National Commissioner and Chief Executive Officer of the NDPC. Image credit: NDPC.
The NDPC will further scrutinise data-sharing arrangements, the lawful bases relied upon for processing, data minimisation, purpose limitation, retention policies and the technical and organisational measures deployed to safeguard the rights of data subjects.
UNILAG: NDPC orders comprehensive investigation
Vincent Olatunji, National Commissioner and Chief Executive Officer of the NDPC, has directed the Commission’s investigation team to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the circumstances surrounding the alleged collection, use and disclosure of the affected students’ personal data.
The investigation will determine the respective roles and responsibilities of UNILAG, Lotus Bank and Hackerbella in the processing of the students’ information and assess whether their activities complied with obligations imposed by the Nigeria Data Protection Act, 2023.
The Commission will also examine whether the alleged processing created risks to the rights and freedoms of the affected students.
Among the areas under investigation are the parties’ Data Protection Impact Assessments, the lawfulness and transparency of any credit scoring or profiling activities, the use of automated decision-making systems and the adequacy of privacy notices provided to affected individuals.
The NDPC will further scrutinise data-sharing arrangements, the lawful bases relied upon for processing, data minimisation, purpose limitation, retention policies and the technical and organisational measures deployed to safeguard the rights of data subjects.
Credit scoring, profiling face regulatory scrutiny
The investigation could have wider significance for Nigeria’s increasingly interconnected education, financial services and technology sectors because of the NDPC’s focus on credit scoring, profiling and automated decision-making.
The Commission is expected to determine whether any profiling of the affected students occurred and, if so, whether it was carried out lawfully and transparently.
It will also examine whether automated systems were used in making decisions concerning the students and whether the organisations involved provided sufficient information about such processing.
The focus on these areas highlights a growing regulatory concern around the use of personal data in systems that can potentially influence an individual’s access to financial services or other services with significant consequences.
The investigation will also seek to establish how students’ information moved between UNILAG, Lotus Bank and Hackerbella, what purposes the data were originally collected for, and whether subsequent sharing or processing remained within those purposes.
NDPC warns educational institutions
Beyond the specific investigation, the NDPC has issued a broader warning to educational institutions that collect and process the personal information of students, staff and other members of their communities.
The Commission said institutions entrusted with such information have a heightened responsibility to ensure that personal data are processed lawfully, fairly, transparently and securely.
The NDPC consequently warned educational institutions that have yet to comply with its existing data protection compliance directives to do so immediately.
The warning places additional pressure on universities and other educational institutions to strengthen their data governance frameworks, particularly where students’ personal information is shared with banks, fintech companies, technology providers, vendors and other third parties.
Student data handling under spotlight
The investigation also draws attention to the data governance responsibilities of organisations operating across institutional boundaries.
Where universities share student information with external service providers, financial institutions or technology companies, questions around purpose limitation, transparency, security and lawful processing become particularly important.
For students, the case underscores the importance of understanding how personal information collected in an academic environment may subsequently be used, disclosed or processed for purposes beyond education and administration.
The NDPC’s investigation will therefore examine not only the alleged opening of bank accounts but also the broader data-processing chain involving the organisations named in the complaints.
Potential implications for universities, banks and technology companies
The outcome of the investigation could have implications beyond the three organisations named by the NDPC.
A finding of non-compliance could reinforce the need for educational institutions to review how student information is transferred to third parties and the controls governing such transfers.
Financial institutions and technology companies working with universities could also face increased scrutiny over the legal basis for accessing student information, the purposes for which such information is processed, and the safeguards applied when personal data are used in financial or technology-enabled services.
The NDPC’s emphasis on Data Protection Impact Assessments, privacy notices, profiling, automated decision-making, data minimisation and purpose limitation also signals the breadth of the regulatory examination.
However, the investigation itself does not establish that UNILAG, Lotus Bank or Hackerbella breached the Nigeria Data Protection Act. The purpose of the forensic probe is to establish the facts, determine the respective responsibilities of the parties and assess compliance with applicable data protection requirements.
As digital services become increasingly embedded in Nigeria’s education and financial sectors, the case could become an important test of how institutions obtain, share and repurpose personal information belonging to students.
The eventual findings of the NDPC are therefore likely to be closely watched by universities, banks, fintechs, technology providers and students concerned about the lawful use and protection of personal data.
Stay ahead with real-time reports, breaking news, and exclusive insights delivered directly to your phone. Don’t settle for outdated information. Join TECHNOLOGYTIMES NEWS on WhatsApp for 24/7 updates.
Former presidential aide Laolu Akande has criticised the African Democratic Congress, ADC, presidential candidate Atiku Abubakar's reported position on power returning to the North, describing the argument as an insult to Nigerians from the region.
Akande, a former Senior Special Assistant to the President on Media and Publicity in the Office of the Vice President, made the remarks while speaking on Symfoni TV on Friday.
Speaking on the readiness and viability of presidential candidates ahead of the coming election, Akande argued that the country must maintain the principle of rotational presidency to promote a sense of belonging among its various regions.
“Atiku is just basically saying that, okay, the North is angry; we want power back. And that idea, with due respect to our brothers in the North, is an insult. It’s an insult. This country, we must maintain rotational presidency for purposes of building a sense of belonging,” he said.
Speaking on the ADC's choice of presidential candidate, he said, “If they were serious, they should have picked Amaechi, or they should have prevented Obi from leaving, and then Atiku would have been a star.”
The Coordinating Minister of Health and Social Welfare, Muhammad Pate, has confirmed that the Ebola virus detected in Nigeria is highly similar to the virus identified in Kenya’s first imported case.
Mr Pate disclosed this on Friday during a briefing at the Federal Ministry of Health in Abuja, saying genomic sequencing showed that the viruses differed by only one mutation.
He said the analysis was conducted by sequencing teams at the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (NCDC) and the Institute of Genomics and Global Health at Redeemer’s University, Ede, Osun State, with the team led by virologist Christian Happi.
However, he cautioned that the finding does not establish how the Nigerian first case acquired the infection.
“Based on the genomic analysis, there is no evidence of travel of that index case in Kenya that links it to Nigeria, but the viruses are appearing to be related,” he said.
He added that the finding could change the understanding of the route of transmission as further investigations and testing continue.
Kenya has so far recordednine confirmed Ebola cases caused by Bundibugyo virus, including one death, according to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Eight of the cases were linked to the country’s first imported case from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), including four healthcare workers.
Africa CDC probes link
The genomic finding came on the same day the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) saidit is investigating a possible connection between Nigeria’s case and Kenya’s first imported case.
The agency said both patients had travelled through Entebbe International Airport in Uganda on 3 October, prompting investigations into whether they had shared equipment or had other contact. Africa CDC, however, stressed that no connection had been established between the infections.
The Kenyan patient travelled from the DRC through Uganda before arriving in Nairobi. He later died, becoming the first recorded Ebola death in Kenya’s current outbreak.
The Nigerian patient also passed through Uganda, but Ugandan authorities had earlier rejected suggestions that this established the country as the source of her infection.
Uganda denies active case
On 21 October, Uganda’s Ministry of Health said it had no confirmed active Ebola case and that the Nigerian patient’s transit through the country did not establish that she contracted the virus there.
The ministry said preliminary information indicated that the Nigerian woman had travelled to eastern DRC for business and passed through Uganda in early October without showing symptoms. It said the location of her exposure remained under investigation.
The new genomic finding now provides evidence of similarity between the Nigerian and Kenyan infections, although Nigerian authorities have not established that the patient was infected in Kenya.
One confirmed case
Mr Pate said Nigeria still has only one confirmed Ebola case and that authorities were continuing contact tracing, quarantine and additional testing of contacts.
Some tests have returned negative results, while others are pending, he said.
He urged Nigerians to remain vigilant but calm, saying there is no need for panic.
“We will continue to work diligently to ensure that we contain this virus as much as possible, and that we avoid a situation that spills over to the communities,” he said.
The minister said the government is also strengthening infection prevention and control measures in health facilities and would train health workers on how to identify and manage suspected cases.
He urged hospitals to notify public health authorities of suspected cases and encouraged Nigerians to observe basic preventive measures, including regular handwashing and hygiene.
Mr Pate also said Ebola is not currently known to be transmitted through the air but through close contact with infected body fluids.
He urged Nigerians to rely on information from public health authorities, including the NCDC, Federal Ministry of Health, World Health Organisation and Africa CDC, rather than unverified information on social media.
Discover more from Premium Times Nigeria
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.