The Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC Ltd) has accused Dangote Petroleum Refinery of attempting to monopolise Nigeria’s fuel market through a lawsuit challenging import licences granted to rival marketers.

In court documents, the state oil company argued that granting Dangote’s request to void or restrict fuel import permits would undermine competition and expose Nigeria to supply disruptions, price instability and threats to national energy security.

The position was contained in a proposed defence filed before the Federal High Court in Lagos in response to a suit instituted by Dangote Petroleum Refinery against the Attorney-General of the Federation.

Reuters reported that the legal dispute has resulted in the Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA) applying to join the case.

The move comes less than a month after Dangote Petroleum Refinery filed a fresh lawsuit against Nigeria’s Attorney-General, seeking to overturn fuel import licences granted to oil marketers and the NNPC.

The lawsuit exchange has also broadened the battle over Nigeria’s fuel import policy and the market influence of Dangote’s 650,000 barrels-per-day refinery.

The dispute comes ahead of Dangote Refinery’s planned initial public offering (IPO) in September, raising fresh concerns over market regulation, competition, and the refinery’s future revenue outlook.

In its lawsuit against the government, the refinery argued that licences issued to rival marketers undermine local refining efforts and violate provisions of the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA), which it said was designed to encourage domestic refining capacity.

However, NNPC has rejected the claim, arguing that the law permits the issuance of import licences to companies with local refining licences or established records in international crude oil and petroleum products trading.

The state oil company further argued that regulators retain the discretion to manage fuel imports under Nigeria’s backward integration policy and that there is no outright ban on fuel imports except where local production sufficiently meets domestic demand.

According to the court documents, NNPC also contended that Dangote refinery had failed to provide “credible, independent or verifiable evidence” that it could consistently meet Nigeria’s total fuel demand and guarantee uninterrupted nationwide supply.

Dangote refinery declined to comment on the matter, citing the ongoing court proceedings.

NNPC also denied allegations that it deliberately frustrated Dangote refinery’s operations or withheld crude oil supplies from the facility.

The company said crude oil allocations were determined by operational, commercial, security and logistical considerations.

Fuel marketers have equally opposed Dangote’s suit, warning that restricting import licences could weaken market competition and threaten fuel supply stability across the country.

The court is expected to hear the matter in the coming weeks.

Background

Since commencing operations in 2024, Dangote Refinery has repeatedly pushed for local marketers to source petroleum products primarily from domestic refineries rather than continue importing refined fuel.

However, the former NMDPRA leadership under Farouk Ahmed consistently resisted any move perceived as creating a monopoly, insisting that allowing a single refinery to dominate supply would undermine competition and threaten Nigeria’s long-term energy security.

That disagreement led to a feud between Aliko Dangote and Mr Ahmed.

Mr Dangote later accused Mr Ahmed of corruption and alleged that the regulator was colluding with international traders and fuel importers to frustrate local refining by continuing to issue import licences.

He also alleged that Mr Ahmed was living beyond his legitimate means, claiming that four of his children were enrolled in expensive secondary schools in Switzerland, raising concerns over possible abuse of office and regulatory integrity.

Mr Ahmed later resigned following the controversy.

Previous lawsuit

In 2024, Dangote Refinery, in suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1324/2024, asked the court to award N100 billion in damages against the NMDPRA for issuing import licences to some marketers and permitting the importation of petroleum products.

The marketers listed in the suit were NNPC Ltd, Matrix Petroleum Services Limited, AYM Shafa Limited, A.A. Rano Limited, T. Time Petroleum Limited, and 2015 Petroleum Limited.

In the suit dated 6 September 2024, the plaintiff’s lawyer, Ogwu Onoja, asked the court to declare that the NMDPRA violated Sections 317(8) and (9) of the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) by issuing licences for the importation of petroleum products.

Dangote Refinery argued that such licences should only be issued when a petroleum product shortfall exists.

The refinery also asked the court to declare that the NMDPRA failed in its statutory responsibility under the PIA by failing to encourage local refineries, such as Dangote Refinery.

However, in a counter-affidavit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1324/2024 dated 5 November 2024 and filed by Ahmed Raji (SAN), the marketers asked the court to dismiss Dangote Refinery’s claims, insisting that competitive practices are essential to Nigeria’s economic health and the viability of the oil sector.

They argued that they were fully qualified to receive import licences from the NMDPRA under Section 317(9) of the PIA.

The defendants further alleged that the plaintiff was attempting to monopolise Nigeria’s petroleum industry by seeking sole control of supply, distribution, and pricing.

In July 2025, Dangote Refinery quietly discontinued the lawsuit challenging the import approvals without publicly stating its reasons, leaving unresolved concerns over market competition and supply dynamics in one of Africa’s largest fuel markets.

READ ALSO: NNPC posts N276 billion profit in March

For decades, Nigeria has relied heavily on imported petrol because its state-owned refineries have performed poorly.

The $20 billion Dangote Refinery, owned by billionaire businessman Aliko Dangote, was expected to end that dependence by supplying refined petroleum products locally.

With an installed capacity of 650,000 barrels per day, the facility is Africa’s largest single-train refinery and is projected to reduce pressure on foreign exchange used for fuel imports significantly.

However, petrol imports have persisted as the refinery continues to ramp up production and distribution capacity, while marketers maintain that domestic output alone has yet to meet national demand fully.

So bad, it’s good? Google on Friday joined in the disco ball icon fun taking place on home screens everywhere. After Spotify’s temporary new disco ball app icon, released to celebrate the company’s 20th anniversary, drew extensive online backlash (and a bit of praise for those who like a little kitsch!), Google decided to get in on the joke and rolled out a custom set of Android app icons sporting a similar disco ball theme.

On X, Android ecosystem head Sameer Samat posted, “Your wish is our command. Disco icons available on Pixel as of today…Are y’all sure you still want this?”

His post included a screenshot of a Pixel phone fully decked out with sparkly, disco-ball-inspired icons, which looks just as terrible (incredible??) as it sounds.

The new icons are available through Pixel’s relatively new custom icons feature, which allows users to choose from different AI-generated styles for their app icons. Before this, users could only customize their icons by changing their colors to match the phone’s wallpaper and theme.

The custom icons feature rolled out in March’s Pixel Drop — Google’s term for its periodic feature updates to Pixel phones — introducing app icon templates like a hand-drawn “Scribbles” aesthetic, a gold look called “Treasure,” a colorful, painted style dubbed “Easel,” and others.

Earlier this week, Samat had jokingly tweeted, “Should we make this icon pack happen on Android?” alongside a Chrome icon turned into a disco ball.

Silly as it may be, Google actually made it happen.

Many people had complained about the Spotify icon, calling it ugly, prompting the company to remind them it was just a temporary sitch. “Alright, we know glitter is not for everyone,” the streamer wrote.

Google, seemingly, disagrees. As off-brand as its disco-themed icons are, there’s also something whimsical about turning your whole homescreen into a sparkly landscape of little apps. (And, in case you missed it, the Zillennials are really into whimsy right now, The New York Times reports, describing their “playful response to a difficult world.”)

Upon seeing Google’s release, X user and former Pixly co-founder Race Johsnon quipped, “When your home screen gets bottle service.” Said another, “Omg it’s awful. I’ll take it!”