Every year on 19 June, the world marks World Sickle Cell Day to raise awareness about a condition affecting millions globally. Yet despite decades of public campaigns encouraging genotype testing and informed marriage decisions, Nigeria continues to record one of the highest burdens of sickle cell disease (SCD) in the world.

According to the Federal Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, the country records approximately 150,000 infants born with sickle cell disease annually, accounting for a significant share of the global burden.

While genotype awareness campaigns have become common in schools, churches, mosques and healthcare facilities, health experts say awareness has not translated into adequate care, early diagnosis or improved quality of life for people already living with the condition.

Speaking with PT Health Watch to mark World Sickle Cell Day, medical and maternal health experts highlighted major gaps in Nigeria’s response to the disease, including weak newborn screening, limited access to treatment, under-resourced primary healthcare and persistent misconceptions.

Beyond genotype awareness

For many Nigerians, discussions around sickle cell disease often focus on genotype compatibility and preventing new births affected by the condition.

However, Happiness Akinde, a medical doctor, said public health conversations must also prioritise the millions already living with the disease.

“Genotype awareness has been extremely important because it helps prevent new cases of sickle cell disease through informed reproductive decisions. However, there is a growing recognition that awareness efforts should also focus on people already living with the condition,” she said.

Ms Akinde explained that although education remains important, knowledge alone does not prevent sickle cell crises.

She noted that even patients who carefully follow medical advice can still experience painful episodes triggered by infections, dehydration, physical or emotional stress, poor sleep and other factors.

According to her, reducing the frequency of crises requires a combination of patient education, preventive treatment, reliable healthcare services and strong social support systems.

She added that conversations around hydration, infection prevention, medication adherence, nutrition, mental health, routine screenings and early recognition of complications deserve as much attention as genotype counselling.

The hidden cost of living with sickle cell disease

Beyond medical challenges, Ms Akinde noted that socioeconomic realities continue to worsen outcomes for many patients.

She said many families struggle to afford medications, transportation to hospitals and routine laboratory investigations required to monitor the disease.

Others live far from healthcare facilities or lack health insurance coverage, making regular care difficult.

“Effective management requires more than personal responsibility. It requires a healthcare system that supports patients consistently,” she said.

Essential medications such as folic acid, antibiotics, pain-relieving drugs and hydroxyurea, a disease-modifying therapy widely recommended for sickle cell disease remain inaccessible to many patients due to cost and availability challenges.

As a result, she noted, many people seek care only when complications become severe rather than receiving preventive treatment that could improve long-term outcomes.

Healthcare system gaps

Ms Akinde explained that weaknesses within the healthcare system continue to affect outcomes for people living with sickle cell disease.

She noted that primary healthcare workers, often the first point of contact for patients, may lack adequate training in sickle cell management, leading to delayed diagnosis of infections, poor follow-up care and inadequate pain management.

She added that some patients face delays in emergency treatment because healthcare providers underestimate the severity of sickle cell pain or are unfamiliar with recommended care protocols.

She also highlighted persistent misconceptions about the disease, including beliefs that crises result solely from poor self-care or that people living with the condition cannot live successful lives.

In addition, she said that some patients face stigma when seeking treatment because their pain is often doubted, while reliance on traditional remedies and delayed hospital visits can further worsen complications.

Poverty, gaps in prevention

Halimat Jimoh, a nurse and a professional midwife, reiterated that poverty, limited healthcare access and weaknesses within primary healthcare facilities contribute significantly to recurrent sickle cell crises.

“I have seen families who understand their child’s condition but simply cannot afford transportation to health facilities, medications, laboratory investigations or regular follow-up appointments,” she said.

Ms Jimoh believes one of Nigeria’s biggest failures is waiting until marriage discussions begin before educating people about genotype compatibility.

She argued that genotype education should begin much earlier through schools, adolescent health programmes and routine reproductive healthcare services.

She also identified major gaps during pregnancy and after delivery.

According to her, many pregnant women undergo genotype testing but receive little counselling about the implications for future pregnancies and their children.

More concerning, she said, is the absence of routine newborn screening across most health facilities.

“Too many babies leave health facilities without any form of newborn screening, meaning families only discover the child has sickle cell disease after repeated illnesses and hospital admissions,” she said.

Although babies with sickle cell disease often appear healthy at birth, Ms Jimoh explained that organ damage can begin long before obvious symptoms emerge.

As foetal haemoglobin gradually decreases during infancy, sickling becomes more pronounced, potentially affecting organs such as the spleen even before painful crises occur.

“Waiting until a child starts having repeated crises means we have already missed an important window to prevent complications and improve long-term outcomes,” she said.

Newborn screening

Globally, newborn screening is recognised as one of the most effective strategies for reducing childhood deaths associated with sickle cell disease.

Early diagnosis allows healthcare workers to monitor affected children closely, educate caregivers, prevent infections and detect complications before they become life-threatening.

Yet routine newborn screening remains largely unavailable across much of Nigeria.

According to Ms Jimoh, inadequate funding, poor infrastructure, shortages of trained personnel and weak referral systems have prevented the intervention from becoming standard practice nationwide.

What Nigeria must do

For both experts, reducing the burden of sickle cell disease will require coordinated action across the healthcare system.

Ms Jimoh identified three priority interventions which includes; strengthening genotype education and counselling before conception, implementing nationwide newborn screening programmes, and improving primary healthcare services to provide continuous follow-up care and caregiver education.

Ms Akinde on the other hand, advocated a broader approach that includes expanding newborn screening, improving access to affordable medications such as hydroxyurea, strengthening primary healthcare systems, training healthcare workers and ensuring universal access to emergency care.

READ ALSO: PT Health Watch: Hidden genotype risks beyond AA, AS drive Nigeria’s sickle cell burden- Expert

Both experts agreed that sickle cell disease must no longer be treated as a neglected condition.

Instead, they argue, it should be recognised as a major public health priority requiring sustained investment, stronger policies and improved healthcare access.

With better diagnosis, affordable treatment and consistent support, they say, people living with sickle cell disease can live longer, healthier and more productive lives.

The theme for this year’s World Sickle Cell Day, “Closing the Survival Gap: Equity in Sickle Cell Disease,” emphasises global and local action to improve support, care, and awareness for patients, while encouraging stronger advocacy for better health outcomes.

The federal government has inaugurated a Presidential Task Force on Ebola Virus Disease Preparedness as part of efforts to sustain Nigeria’s zero-case status and strengthen the country’s capacity to respond to potential outbreaks.

Speaking at the inauguration on Thursday at the State House, the Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, who chairs the task force, said there were currently no reported cases of Ebola in Nigeria.

Mr Gbajabiamila said the government was intensifying preventive measures to ensure the country remains free of the disease while positioning itself to take a leading role in epidemic preparedness and response across Africa.

“We inaugurated the committee today on Nigeria’s preparedness for the Ebola Virus Disease. We have covered a lot of ground, and there are presently no reported cases in the country, which is good news,” he said.

He stressed that Nigeria’s approach is centred on prevention rather than cure, noting that lessons from previous outbreaks, particularly the 2014 Ebola outbreak, have informed the development of stronger surveillance and response systems.

Focus on prevention

Mr Gbajabiamila said the government was determined to avoid a repeat of the events of 2014, when an infected traveller brought the virus into Nigeria, triggering an emergency public health response.

According to him, the task force has established structures and subcommittees to address critical areas of preparedness and response.

“We do not want a repeat of what happened during the last outbreak when a carrier entered the country, and everyone was scrambling to respond,” he said.

He added that the government was building permanent systems that would remain effective even years after the current threat had passed.

“We want to put in place permanent arrangements and structures so that in two or three years, if another outbreak occurs, we will not be running from pillar to post trying to establish response mechanisms,” he said.

Surveillance, coordination

Mr Gbajabiamila said special attention was being given to international airports and land borders because of the high volume of cross-border movements.

He noted that the federal government was working closely with states hosting international airports, including Lagos, Kano, Rivers, Enugu and the Federal Capital Territory, to strengthen monitoring and rapid-response mechanisms.

Mr Gbajabiamila said agencies responsible for border management and immigration, as well as border communities, had been incorporated into the preparedness framework.

He explained that the task force includes committees on border management, immigration control and disease surveillance, while the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (NCDC) will provide overall technical leadership and coordination.

Key stakeholders

The inauguration brought together senior government officials and public health experts, including the Minister of Information and National Orientation, Mohammed Idris; the Minister of Interior, Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo; and the Director-General of the NCDC, Jide Idris.

Others in attendance included representatives of state health ministries, the World Health Organisation (WHO), airport authorities, epidemiologists and public health organisations.

Background

The inauguration comes about a week after President Bola Tinubu approved the establishment of the Task Force and authorised the release of N10 billion in emergency intervention funding to strengthen Nigeria’s readiness against a possible outbreak.

As PREMIUM TIMES previously reported, the fund is intended to bolster the operational capacity of the NCDC and support critical public health emergency response activities across the country.

The Task Force, chaired by Mr Gbajabiamila, was created following a high-level stakeholder meeting that reviewed Nigeria’s preparedness and developed strategies to prevent the importation of Ebola into the country.

The federal government’s actions followed renewed Ebola outbreaks in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda, prompting concerns about the risk of cross-border transmission.

Authorities subsequently announced plans to strengthen surveillance at airports and land borders, activate isolation and referral facilities, and improve coordination among health, aviation and security agencies.