The achievements enacted by a trio of African countries at this year’s FIFA World Cup raise three related yet varying lessons that Nigeria’s senior national team, Super Eagles, should learn from.
The first lesson comes from an amazing chain of heroics pulled off by Cape Verde during their debut campaign at the global football fiesta, where they did not lose a single game within regulation time.
The tiny island that does not even have any sort of pedigree regarding football excellence in Africa proved all stats, experts, analysts and fans wrong with three straight group stage draws against Spain (0-0), Uruguay (2-2) and Saudi Arabia (0-0).
To confirm that those results were no fluke, they kept equalising against Argentina in the round of 32 and took the game into extra time before Lionel Messi’s squad eventually scaled the hurdle with a pretty tight 3-2 win.
The lesson for Nigeria here is that ‘big names’ don’t win matches – it’s the zeal, commitment, focus and determination of your players that will give you the results you deserve. Once our Super Eagles play with their heart, they will surely return to glory days.
That’s what they did at USA ’94 and almost deleted Italy in the second round. They then beat Brazil and Argentina en route to winning the 1996 Olympic Games’ gold medal in Atlanta, USA. Cape Verde did what we did 32 and 30 years ago in the same God’s Own country, and they almost shocked the universe.
Our Eagles will now have to beware of a potent threat from The Blue Sharks should any fixture in Africa bring them up against our team. All cheers to Cape Verde – you dare ignore them or underrate them at your own peril.
The same goes for Egypt, who eventually got their first ever knockout game at the World Cup. Despite having been Africa’s first World Cup representative as far back as 1934 and they have a huge record of seven titles from the Nations Cup, the Pharaohs had never gone beyond the Mundial’s group stage.
The Pharaohs are also the only country to win the Africa Cup of Nations at three straight editions (2006, 2008, 2010), plus a record number of 26 outings at the continental football showpiece and three previous FIFA World Cup appearances.
They eventually proved their mettle by not only reaching the knock-out stage, but also coming within just 12 minutes of a shock victory over Argentina (again!) and they nearly got what would have been a historic quarter-finals ticket at this year’s Mundial.
Sadly, tears rolled out for Egypt on Tuesday when they gave up a two-goal lead and fell 3-2 to Argentina. This time out, many fans, analysts and experts of the round leather game were crying wolf and screaming blue murder.
Egypt’s coach and legend, Hossam Hassan, alleged that FIFA gave Argentina the game due to marketing and commercial factors (leveraging Messi’s name and image).
Whatever the case, the lessons to be learnt by the Super Eagles are:
1. Fishy referee and VAR decisions can come out against any team.
2. Never stop powering strong until the referee’s last blast of the whistle.
3. Don’t celebrate your goals until you are sure the game is in your bag.
4. Don’t mock your opponents when they are down and you are in control.
5. There’s a thin but very ominous line between a game that’s almost won and one that’s eventually lost, but the pain of defeat lasts longer than the pleasure of victory.
6. The jinx that Argentina holds over African teams will not be easily broken (*remember they’ve besten us three times at the World Cup).
However, while all of Africa and many experts of the game shed tears for Egypt and slammed FIFA for orchestrating their exit, the case was different in the analysis of Morocco’s success story of the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Instead of cheers for The Atlas Lions, they’re now getting jeers all the way.
Jeers for Morocco, instead of tears, following their 2-0 loss to France on Thursday night. Incidentally, two players with African blood and ancestry got the goals – Kylian Mbappe and Ousmane Dembele. So, where would African sentiments flood after that result?
Yes, no one will begrudge the Moroccans about their acumen and aptitude. No one will fault their ability to enact historic feats on the global stage, and everyone knows that (on current form) they have what it takes to always make it into the semi-finals of the world’s biggest football event.
Conversely, though, the sore point for the men from Rabat came when one of their leaders and ‘elders’ declared in an uncouth spat that The Atlas Lions are not playing for Africa and they are not representing our continent. What audacity and effrontery!
Alarmingly, that blast from Morocco is akin to the bane of xenophobia in South Africa, which caused a loss of goodwill for Bafana Bafana from neighbouring countries and affiliate nations during their gallant surge into the round of 32.
Sadly, where South Africans erred with physical attacks on their ‘brothers and sisters across the continent,’ Morocco followed suit with a verbal assault and haughty bravado … leading to the same effect and consequences.
The lesson for Nigeria – no matter how good your team is, you can never rely on support from your country alone on the global stage – you need the solidarity of other countries within your shared hemisphere and similar historical lineage for you to excel globally.
Three lessons from a trio of teams with divergent fortunes at the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Will our players take a cue or flow with Déjà vu? Time will tell…
As one of Africa’s largest pharmaceutical markets — trailing only South Africa by value, and among the continent’s largest by population and consumption volume — Nigeria nonetheless leans heavily on imports to bridge a wide domestic supply gap, with roughly 70 per cent of medicines still sourced from overseas to meet its healthcare needs.
However, some local drug manufacturing companies, such as Fidson, May & Baker, and Mecure Industries, continue to overcome local manufacturing challenges to ensure local drug production and even export some of the locally produced drugs.
Yet, even the local drug manufacturing market is at the mercy of importation as it sources more than 90 per cent of its active pharmaceutical ingredients and excipients overseas.
Population growth, the pressure of urbanisation and increasing healthcare awareness are stoking demand for medicines in Nigeria, notably over-the-counter drugs which are seen taking up 69.4 per cent of total market share this year.
From $2 billion to $3.3 billion, estimates diverge as to the size of the Nigerian pharma market, with compound annual growth rate (CAGR) put at 6.5 per cent from 2025 to 2029.
Fidson’s dominance
On the exit of British multinational biopharma firm GlaxoSmithKline from Nigeria in 2023, the active pharmaceutical companies listed on the Nigerian Exchange are now four, namely Fidson Healthcare, May & Baker, Mecure Industries and Neimeth. That is only a fragment, considering that over 120 functional drugmakers altogether operate in Nigeria.
Fidson, which has a contract manufacturing relationship with Haleon, a British multinational consumer health giant and producer of brands such as Sensodyne, Panadol, Advil and Centrum, has led the publicly quoted pharma market for quite a while.
It holds the biggest slice of that market, alone accounting for well above half of the market share in the quarter to March 2026, when revenue soared to N42.6 billion year on year from N35 billion.
Mecure Industries, May & Baker (where Theophilus Danjuma, a former chief of army staff and minister of defence, is the biggest shareholder) and Neimeth came in tow, recording N20.2 billion, N8.4 billion and N1.8 billion in that order.
Little as it looks, exports by Fidson, at N1.8 billion, constituted only 4.3 per cent of revenue, but was a vast progress over the N146.5 million earned in the same period of the previous year.
Fidson’s topline performance in the period, as in recent years, built on a domestic prescription drug market boom, which Statista forecasted to touch $2.9 billion in sales in 2025 and thereafter advance at an annual growth rate of 3.6 per cent through 2029.
Ethical drugs, which have secured a place for themselves as the lifeblood of revenue, alone contributed 56.3 per cent of turnover.
For the financial year 2025, annual revenue climbed to an all-time peak of N119.1 billion from N84.1 billion, 53.3 per cent higher than that of Mecure, its closest rival.
Investment management firm Cardinal Stone has estimated that revenue for Fidson recorded a CAGR of around 28.5 per cent from FY 2021 to FY2024.
Beyond the favourable market dynamics, sales growth has reaped gains in no small measure from the forward-looking sectoral reforms of a government that is dreaming of ramping up the local share of national drug production to 70 per cent by 2030.
Nigeria’s pharma industry watchdog, the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control, issued a provisional approval in April for R21 Malaria Vaccine to be marketed in Nigeria.
The push cleared the hurdle for a deal between Fidson and Serum Institute of India Pvt Limited, the maker of the vaccine, targeting prevention of clinical malaria in children aged 5 to 36 months and reduction of malaria-related mortality in tropical Africa.
In September 2024, the company reached a joint venture pact with Chinese companies Jiangsu Aidea Pharma, Nanjing PharmaBlock, and the Beijing-based China-Africa Development Fund to set up a facility for the manufacturing of HIV drugs in the Lekki Free Trade Zone in Lagos, aiming for West African pharmaceutical markets.
The management took its international partnership further last September when it had an agreement with Ohara Pharmaceutical Co. Limited.
The move would enable the Tokyo-based company to support Fidson’s capital raise and offer advisory support “based on insights from the Japanese pharmaceutical industry that will expand the capabilities of Fidson to produce more specialised medicines for the management of diverse disease conditions.”
Profit After Tax
Fidson’s post-tax profit went up by 39.4 per cent to N4.6 billion in Q1 2026, compared to a year ago, helped by a stronger sales expansion and, in part, by cost management. Mecure and May & Baker jointly came second, each reporting N1.3 billion, while Neimeth posted N113.4 million.
After-tax profit for 2025 grew to N9.9 billion from N4.4 billion. The company was followed by Mecure (N6.5 billion), May & Baker (N4.4 billion) and Neimeth (N976.4 million).
“Notably, during the period, the company commenced the export of its products, earning an additional N523.1 million in revenue,” Cardinal Stone stated in a research note in January on the 2025 rreport.
The Financial Times, in its African Fastest Growing Companies’ list for 2024, ranked Fidson 65th at a CAGR of 42.1 per cent. The company took the 67th position the following year with a CAGR of 42.6 per cent.
EBIT Margin
EBIT margin, which shows the operational profitability of a company by measuring its core profit in proportion to revenue, stood at 19.4 per cent for Fidson in the first quarter of the year, slightly up from Q1 2025 level of 18.9 per cent.
Neimeth led in this performance parameter, scoring 32.4 per cent, followed by Mecure (22.5 per cent) and May & Baker (21.3 per cent).
Fidson reported 18.4 per cent in EBIT margin for 2025, significantly higher than 5.2 per cent in 2024.
NET PROFIT MARGIN
Fidson’s net profit margin stood above all its peers’ but May & Baker’s (15.2 per cent) in the first quarter of 2026 as it jumped to 10.7 per cent from 9.3 per cent a year ago. Mecure reported a net profit margin of 6.7 per cent in the period, while Neimeth recorded 6.5 per cent.
For FY2025, the company posted a net profit margin of 8.3 per cent, up from 5.2 per cent in the corresponding period of the preceding year.
TOTAL ASSETS
The company is regarded as Nigeria’s biggest drugmaker on the strength of its asset base, which topped N93.7 billion in the period under review, increasing by 16.7 per cent year on year.
That was spurred largely by a more than twofold surge in trade & other receivables and, in part, by property, plant and equipment, following increased construction work in progress.
Total assets stood at N80.3 billion as of FY2025 and at N73.5 billion at FY2024.
Last December, Fidson launched a N21 billion rights issue, which was oversubscribed by 117 per cent, to raise capital to beef up production capacity, accelerate its pan-African expansion and deleverage its balance sheet.
Mecure Industries’ total assets for the period rose 36.4 per cent to N81.3 billion, May & Baker’s climbed by 1.5 per cent to N26.8 billion, while Neimeth’s jumped by 13.7 per cent to N14.1 billion.
Fidson’s ROAE dropped to 7 per cent from 12.8 per cent as its shareholder fund sharply expanded at a rate disproportionate to its net profit during the period, diluting the indicator. As a financial metric, ROAE implies how effectively the shareholder fund of a company has been used in earning profit over a period of time.
For FY2025, ROAE stood at 37.6 per cent, up from 28.9 per cent the year before.
May & Baker recorded an ROAE of 8.9 per cent within the period, down from 10.9 per cent in the first quarter of 2025. Mecure reported 6.5 per cent, up from 4.5 per cent, while Neimeth recorded 4.2 per cent, compared with 6.8 per cent a year earlier.
RETURN ON AVERAGE ASSETS (ROAA)
Fidson topped others in terms of ROAA, an indicator of how well a company puts its assets to use in generating profit, scoring 5.2 per cent in Q1 2026, relative to 4.2 per cent a year ago.
It recorded 12.9 per cent for FY2025 and 8.5 per cent for FY2024.
May & Baker came next at 4.9 per cent ROAA in Q1 2026, up from 4.5 per cent, while Mecure fell to 1.6 per cent from 4.1 per cent. Neimeth dropped to 0.8 per cent from 0.9 per cent.
Editor’s Note: This is a Native Advertising story.
Discover more from Premium Times Nigeria
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
The Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, has accused the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, of acting with institutional bias against the party, alleging that the electoral body is contributing to efforts aimed at weakening the opposition ahead of the 2027 general elections.
The allegation was contained in a statement issued on Saturday by the National Publicity Secretary of the party’s Interim National Working Committee, Ini Ememobong, and posted on the official social media page of the PDP.
The party said its allegation followed INEC’s refusal to recognise its Interim National Working Committee despite being formally notified after the Supreme Court’s judgment on the leadership crisis.
The PDP said it subsequently approached the Federal High Court in Abuja to compel the commission to recognise the interim leadership but expressed dissatisfaction with the court’s ruling, describing it as inconsistent with previous judgments of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal.
The party disclosed that it has appealed the judgment, insisting that the legal dispute was aimed at protecting the integrity of the PDP from what it described as attempts to reduce Nigeria’s leading opposition party into “an appendage of the ruling party.”
“We approached the court to preserve the integrity of the Peoples Democratic Party from those who seek to reduce Nigeria’s foremost opposition party into an appendage of the ruling party,” the statement said.
The PDP further alleged that INEC’s conduct throughout the legal proceedings had reinforced public concerns about the commission’s neutrality.
“The Commission’s actions have regrettably reinforced the growing public perception that it is no longer acting with the impartiality expected of the nation’s electoral umpire,” the party stated.
It accused INEC of withholding material facts in court proceedings involving the PDP and ignoring congresses conducted under the commission’s supervision whenever such facts contradicted its position before the courts.
“The Commission’s filings, its arguments before the courts, and its refusal to comply with court orders favourable to our Party have collectively created an impression of institutional bias that should concern every Nigerian, irrespective of political affiliation,” the statement added.
The opposition party also claimed that the refusal to recognise its interim leadership forms part of a broader effort to weaken opposition parties and pave the way for what it described as a one-party state in Nigeria.
According to the PDP, it remains confident that the Court of Appeal will clarify the legal issues surrounding the leadership dispute and reaffirm the authority of earlier judgments delivered by higher courts.