Connect with us

Business

NDIC sues Wema Bank over N125bn Banana Island properties, N401m disputed payment

info

Published

on

MixCollage 14 May 2026 08 39 PM 7513.jpg

The Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC), acting as liquidator of the defunct Gulf Bank Plc, has filed two separate suits against Wema Bank at the Federal High Court in Lagos, seeking the recovery of disputed Banana Island properties valued at about N125.38 billion and an alleged unauthorised payment of N401 million.

According to court documents shared with PREMIUM TIMES on Thursday, the case marked FHC/L/CP/466/26 and another companion suit, were filed under the Failed Banks (Recovery of Debts) and Financial Malpractices in Banks Act.

The NDIC said the action forms part of efforts to recover assets linked to the defunct bank, whose licence was revoked by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) in January.

At the centre of the dispute are 12 high-value properties in Banana Island, Lagos, which NDIC explained were acquired through companies linked to Gulf Bank before its collapse.

NDIC is asking the court to declare the alleged disposal of the assets illegal and to compel Wema Bank to either return the title documents or pay the current value of the properties.

NDIC also challenged what it described as a disputed payment of N401 million, which it said was collected by Wema Bank from the United Bank for Africa (UBA), acting as its agent bank.

Gulf Bank collapsed after its operating licence was revoked by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) on 16 January 2006, due to insolvency and failure to meet capitalisation requirements.

Allegations of asset stripping

In a witness statement on oath filed on 6 March, a former Deputy Director at NDIC and ex-head of its Criminal Investigation Unit, Joseph Okolonji, said he personally supervised investigations into the transactions.

He told the court that the probe uncovered alleged efforts to strip the defunct bank of six Banana Island properties registered in the name of Euston Wenberg Engineering Company Limited.

According to him, the properties, measuring 13,794.145 square metres, are now valued at about N62.07 billion based on an estimated rate of N4.5 million per square metre.

Mr Okolonji alleged that Wema Bank gave the impression that the assets were sold for N250 million, even though it had no legal interest in the properties.

He also said investigators found no evidence of any valid interbank deposit to justify Wema Bank’s custody of the assets.

NDIC disputes the alleged deposit

NDIC argued that Wema Bank’s claim was based on a purported interbank placement of N771.79 million allegedly linked to Gulf Bank.

However, it said a joint special examination conducted by the CBN and NDIC in 2005 found no record of such a deposit in Gulf Bank’s books.

The report, according to NDIC, showed that Gulf Bank later described the funds as investments tied to Bankers’ Acceptances involving Ibom Power Company and Grix Nigeria Limited—an explanation regulators rejected.

NDIC further said there were no supporting banking documents such as placement memoranda, deposit slips, or account statements to back the transaction.

It also faulted Wema Bank’s reliance on two managers’ cheques issued in 2005 by Access Bank and Intercontinental Bank, totalling N250 million, which it linked to the disputed properties.

The corporation described the figure as unrealistic, arguing that even a single Banana Island property at the time was worth more than N500 million.

Second suit over Bacad-linked properties

In the second suit, NDIC is also challenging ownership of another six Banana Island properties allegedly acquired through Bacad Finance and Investment Limited, later renamed Supra Commercials Limited.

NDIC said Gulf Bank held the majority shares in the company and used it to acquire the properties, which cover about 13,979.974 square metres and are now valued at N62.91 billion.

It alleged that the bank later planned to develop the land into a luxury estate in partnership with Shelter Afrique before its collapse.

The corporation said Wema Bank later took possession of the assets and claimed they were sold for N524 million through managers’ cheques issued between 2006 and 2007.

It also accused the bank of collecting N401 million from UBA in 2009, despite earlier approval of only about N1.63 million as the amount due after liquidation.

NDIC said it had referred aspects of the transactions to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) for investigation.

It listed several senior lawyers and retired security officials involved in its probe, including Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) D.A. Awosika, Pekun Sowole, retired Deputy Inspector General of Police Abiodun Alabi, and Joseph Okolonji.

The corporation also said it would call estate valuer Adebare Esan as a witness.

Wema Bank’s objection

Wema Bank, through its legal team led by Oladapo Olanipekun, Kehinde Ogunwunmiju, and Tunde Afe-Babalola, who are all SANs, challenged the jurisdiction of the court.

It argued that the dispute did not arise from a banking transaction covered by the Failed Banks Act and insisted that there was no debtor-creditor relationship between the two parties.

The bank also argued that the case is statute-barred, saying the transactions occurred between 2006 and 2007.

It urged the court to dismiss the suits.

The court adjourned the matter until 25 June for further hearing.

Background

NDIC, as the statutory liquidator of failed banks in Nigeria, is empowered to recover assets and liabilities on behalf of depositors. Its action in this case is anchored on the Failed Banks (Recovery of Debts) and Financial Malpractices in Banks Act, which gives the Federal High Court jurisdiction over such matters.

Gulf Bank Plc was wound up after its licence was revoked by the Central Bank of Nigeria. Since then, NDIC has continued to trace and recover assets allegedly linked to the bank before its collapse.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Subsidy Return: International investors, markets have written off Nigerian opposition politicians as unserious, says Oyedele

info

Published

on

761940b4 0e4d 4125 906a 0357cf056b99.jpg

Nigeria’s Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Taiwo Oyedele, said on Saturday that international investors and markets have written off Nigerian opposition politicians calling for a return to the subsidy regime.

Mr Oyedele spoke on the sidelines of the World Bank/IMF meetings in Bangkok, Thailand.

The minister responded to questions about how the government hopes to balance the needs of the investment community with domestic concerns among citizens.

“The second point I want to make, and hopefully this will not be misinterpreted, is that, in having all those meetings (with global development and financial organisations, investors and market leaders), I concluded that the markets, including the domestic market—because that you can read from the capital markets—and the international markets, have largely, largely written off the opposition in Nigeria as being unserious. That is why they have not priced in the proposed return of subsidy,” Mr Oyedele said.

“And the reason why you know what I’m saying is right is, God forbid a bad thing, if Mr President says today, ‘we are considering subsidy’, you will see the reflection in price. So maybe it’s good that the international community and the domestic capital markets are aware of who is sincere with Nigerian people and what direction of travel they should take.”

Nigeria has introduced a series of reforms the government said focused on fixing the economy’s structure. However, the impact has been enormous for many Nigerians grappling with the cost-of-living crisis. The government introduced reforms in the foreign exchange market, abolished what it termed a wasteful, corruption-ridden subsidy regime amid fiscal pressures, and institutionalised tax reforms.

PT WHATSAPP CHANNEL
Dangote Refinery AD

While the Nigerian government, led by President Bola Tinubu, has defended its economic policy of subsidy removal as critical to the nation’s fiscal survival, opposition politicians—such as Atiku Abubakar of the ADC and Peter Obi of the NDC—have canvassed for and promised a return to different subsidy arrangements if elected into power.

Opposition

In August, Atiku said he believed a country’s progress and wealth should be measured by citizens’ ability to buy goods and services, not by how much revenue the government collects.

“On the question of subsidy, my position has not changed and will not change: I will restore it! A nation as blessed as ours has no business abandoning its citizens to hardship. Nigeria is rich enough to look after her own,” the former vice president vowed.

Mr Obi, who on his part had earlier warned that subsidy was an “organised crime” that would be removed, made a U-turn in a BBC interview on Tuesday, 6 October, saying he would restore the subsidy if elected president.

He argued that the subsidy regime’s major problem was the corruption surrounding its implementation.

“I’ll remove the corruption and retain the subsidy,” he said.

Mr Obi also explained how he intended to tackle corruption, arguing that his anti-corruption strategy would centre on the president’s conduct and that of his immediate family.

“If you are not stealing, if you are not involved, your wife and family are not involved, you reduce it by 50 per cent,” the presidential candidate said.

READ ALSO: No return to fuel subsidy, multiple exchange rates, Oyedele insists

Messrs Obi and Atiku are the leading opposition figures in Nigeria’s next general elections scheduled for January 2027. Previously, both opposition figures had been unequivocal about removing the petrol subsidy.

PREMIUM TIMES reported earlier on Saturday that Mr Oyedele said there will be no return to subsidy regimes, adding that the 30-day retail margin discount introduced by the government isn’t a subsidy arrangement.

“And let me be clear as well, this was a recurring question almost through all our engagements, but also with the rating agencies, with the investors, and the multilateral institutions. Every time they ask, are you reversing your plans? Are you bringing back subsidies? Let me be clear, there will be no return to fuel subsidies or multiple exchange rates,” he said.


Discover more from Premium Times Nigeria

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Business

NCC Launches Internet Governance Working Group to Sustain Stakeholder Dialogue

info

Published

on

BY NKECHI NAECHE-ESEZOBOR—Nigeria’s telecoms regulator, has created a permanent forum meant to ensure that conversations about how the internet is run do not end when conferences do.

The Internet Governance Working Group was unveiled on Thursday, October 15, 2026, during the first Internet Governance Symposium organised by the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) in Lagos. It is intended to give interested parties an ongoing space to exchange views, agree on practical priorities and act in a coordinated way on matters shaping the country’s digital environment.

Abraham Oshadami, the NCC’s Executive Commissioner, Technical Services, opened the event on behalf of the Commission’s Executive Vice Chairman and CEO, Dr Aminu Maida.

He argued that choices about the internet go beyond technical and connectivity questions, telling the audience that they touch on opportunity, trust, security and the rights of users. For that reason, he said, Nigeria must take an active part in shaping the discussion.

Oshadami observed that the fast pace of artificial intelligence is altering the way people study, work, communicate and obtain services. At the same time, it is raising worries about harmful content, fraud, privacy, accountability and the safety of children. No single body, he said, can tackle such problems alone, so the communications sector and others must work together.

He pointed to two NCC instruments as part of the response. The Internet Code of Practice (ICOP) 2026 is meant to foster a safer and more responsible online space, though he noted that its impact depends on clear expectations, genuine engagement with stakeholders and steady implementation. The Cyber Resilience Framework for the Nigeria Communication Sector (CRF-NCS) is aimed at making the infrastructure behind digital services more secure and resilient. Together, he said, they reflect a basic duty to let Nigerians use the internet with more confidence.

The Executive Commissioner asked attendees to speak frankly and constructively and to depart with a better grasp of what is expected of each of them, along with a common resolve to act.

He thanked participants and appealed for lasting cooperation toward a safer, more secure and responsible digital future for Nigeria.

The post NCC Launches Internet Governance Working Group to Sustain Stakeholder Dialogue appeared first on Business Today NG.

Continue Reading

Trending