OPL 471 is located in the shallow offshore, western Niger Delta of Nigeria
In a ruling delivered on 24 April, Justice Adamu Mohammed held that the Chinese oil firm failed to show sufficient grounds for the court to vacate its earlier judgement delivered on 23 May 2025.
The judge dismissed the application entirely, ruling that the court had become “functus officio” after delivering its judgement and finding that the originating summons and hearing notices had been properly served on the company.
In the substantive judgement delivered last year, the court held that Cutra International was entitled to a 10 per cent equity participation in the oil block as the local content vehicle in the deal.
Mr Mohammed said the Chinese firm did not controvert the facts presented by the plaintiff regarding the award of the oil block and the company’s stake in it.
“By that letter, the plaintiff was the local content vehicle for OPL 471, and the equity participation for the plaintiff is 10 per cent,” the judge held.
Although the court declined to grant Cutra International the full amount of its claims due to insufficient evidence supporting certain claimed expenses and damages, it awarded the company $100 million in damages against CNPC.
In its application to set aside the judgement, CNPC argued that the suit was statute-barred, the originating summons had expired, and that the substituted service ordered by the court was defective because it involved a foreign company.
However, Mr Mohammed rejected the arguments, noting that the court had earlier renewed the originating summons in May 2024.
The judge also held that CNPC failed to establish any convention between Nigeria and its home country that would render Order 6, Rule 20, of the Federal High Court Rules applicable in the matter.
“Based on the foregoing decisions of this court, I am of the view that it will not be in the interest of justice to grant any of the reliefs sought in the instant application, and it is accordingly dismissed,” the judge ruled.
BY NKECHI NAECHE-ESEZOBOR—The organized labor movement on Monday hailed a recent ruling by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) confirming that the right to strike is implicit in Convention 87 as a landmark victory for workers worldwide.
However, the ruling has sparked a fresh domestic debate, with labor representatives strongly criticizing the Nigeria Employers’ Consultative Association (NECA) for attempting to downplay the judgment’s impact.
The controversy escalated following a television appearance by the Director-General of NECA, Mr. Adewale Smatt-Oyerinde.
Speaking on TVC, Oyerinde argued that the right to strike is not automatic and asserted that workers must still adhere strictly to existing local labor laws, specifically citing Section 43 of the Trade Dispute Act (TDA).
He also suggested that a meeting of social partners to establish complimentary conditions remains a necessary precondition before any strike action can be declared.
Labor representatives quickly fired back, labeling Oyerinde’s remarks as an “unnecessary academic exercise in futility” and a selective interpretation of international law. Critics accused the NECA boss of being economical with the historical background of the dispute, pointing out that the issue had already undergone exhaustive debate across various levels of the International Labour Organization (ILO).
The legal battle began when the global Employers’ Group challenged whether the right to strike was protected under Convention 87.
After the ILO Governing Board affirmed the right through a majority decision, the Employers’ Group appealed the matter to the ICJ. As the highest judicial body in the world, the ICJ’s subsequent ruling in favor of workers is considered definitive and legally binding.
Labor advocates emphasize that Nigeria ratified Convention 87 in 1960, signaling a long-standing commitment to its principles. They argue that following the ICJ’s conclusive verdict, both the Nigerian government and employer bodies like NECA are obligated to obey the law unconditionally rather than selectively hiding behind local statutes to weaken workers’ rights.
Reassuring the public and the business community, labor stakeholders maintained that a strike has never been the first option for workers, but rather a last resort. They cautioned that an adversarial interpretation of the ICJ ruling by employers would only harm industrial harmony, urging instead for mutual respect and total adherence to international legal frameworks to guide future industrial relations in Nigeria.
The average retail price of Premium Motor Spirit (petrol) rose to ₦1,532.93 per litre in April 2026, up from ₦1,288.54 recorded in March, according to data released by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) on Friday.
The latest Premium Motor Spirit (Petrol) Price Watch shows that the April price represents an 18.97 per cent increase on a month-on-month basis.
The report also indicates that on a year-on-year basis, the average retail price rose from ₦1,239.33 in April 2025 to ₦1,532.93 in April 2026, representing a 23.69 per cent increase.
According to the NBS data, Yobe recorded the highest average retail price at ₦1,599.05 per litre, followed by Edo at ₦ 1,595.74 and Bauchi at ₦ 1,589.07.
On the other hand, Niger recorded the lowest average price at ₦1,403.89 per litre, followed by Sokoto at ₦1,404.16 and Katsina at ₦1,406.28.
The South-South recorded the highest average retail price at ₦1,566.76 per litre, while the North-West recorded the lowest at the ₦1,508.81 per litre.
Diesel price increases
The National Bureau of Statisticsalso said the average retail price of Automotive Gas Oil (diesel) rose by 50.16 per cent on a month-on-month basis in April 2026.
The price increased from N1,648.06 per litre in March to N2,474.69 per litre in April.
On a year-on-year basis, diesel price increased by 43.67 per cent from ₦1,722.45 per litre in April 2025 to N2,474.69 per litre in April 2026.