Connect with us

News

UN investigators press Nigerian govt on atrocities in Middle Belt

info

Published

on

Un1.jpg

The offices of United Nations Special Rapporteurs have formally contacted the Government of Nigeria over allegations of grave human rights violations in the Middle Belt region.

The States of Nigeria commonly referred to as belonging to the Middle Belt are Benue, Kogi, Kwara, Nasarawa, Niger, Plateau, and the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja.

A statement on Thursday by the International Bar Association, IBA, said the UN investigators’ correspondence marks “a significant escalation in international scrutiny of the ongoing violence.”

The communication issued by the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary/arbitrary executions focused on the right to life, food, housing, and security, among others.

It followed the 2025 Joint Urgent Appeal submitted to the UN by eyeWitnesses to Atrocities, founded by the International Bar Association and the International Committee of Nigeria, ICON.

According to the IBA, the Special Rapporteurs requested detailed information from the Nigerian government on measures taken at both the federal and state levels regarding several critical issues.

These include probe and prosecution of perpetrators of killings and other abuses; accountability for attacks executed by non-state actors; and allegations that security forces didn’t adequately protect civilians.

Others are: causes of the violence; its impact on women, children, people with disabilities, and other vulnerable groups; protection, rehabilitation, and support for affected areas and internally displaced persons.

The UN experts also demanded information about the wanton and widespread destruction of homes, livelihoods, and civilian infrastructure linked to the onslaughts across the crisis-prone zone.

Director of eyeWitness, Carrie Bowker, noted that the decision by multiple UN Special Rapporteurs to engage the Nigerian government demonstrates the gravity of the allegations emerging from the Middle Belt.

Bowker said evidence captured by ICON and local record-keepers depicts the years of violence, displacement, and loss endured by citizens, adding that “meaningful investigations and accountability are now essential.”

“Behind every piece of footage is a family, a destroyed home, or a life lost,” IBA President Claudio Visco remarked. “Survivors and affected communities deserve protection, justice, and sustained international attention.”

Visco added that the communication from the experts appointed by the United Nations sends a clear message that the serious human rights violations in Nigeria’s Middle Belt cannot remain invisible.

ICON captured 3,276 video clips between January 2022 and March 2025. The evidence—comprising witness interviews, documenters’ notes, and open-source research—was presented to the UN in October 2025.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Lagos health agencies ready to contain Ebola, Sanwo-Olu says

info

Published

on

By

Governor Sanwo Olu of Lagos state signing a document e1736432578953.webp

The Lagos State government says it is fully prepared to contain any case of the Bundibugyo strain of the Ebola virus as soon as it is detected in the state to prevent it from spreading.

Special Adviser to Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu on media and publicity, Gboyega Akosile, disclosed this to the Peoples Gazette, on Friday, while reacting to the inclusion of Lagos by the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (NCDC), among other states, on high Ebola preparedness alert.

Although no confirmed case of Ebola virus has been recorded in Nigeria, the NCDC director-general, Jide Idris, in a statement on Thursday, listed Lagos, FCT, Rivers, Kano, Enugu, Borno, Akwa Ibom, Cross River, Taraba, and Adamawa, as high-risk states, due to international airports, porous borders, and active trade or travel routes.

Mr Idris also identified Ogun, Nasarawa, Kaduna, Plateau, Kogi, Niger, Jigawa, Katsina, Bauchi, Ebonyi, Abia, and Bayelsa as moderate-risk states requiring sustained preparedness efforts against possible Ebola importation and transmission threats.

Mr Akosile said that while it is not the duty of the state government, the Sanwo-Olu administration is in contact with the federal government to prevent any possible entry of the virus into the country, while health agencies in the state have already been mobilised in readiness for any eventuality.

He said, “In terms of readiness for any form of eventualities, Lagos State has demonstrated that it is ready to tackle issues like this. We demonstrated this and tackled it head on, during the administration of Babatunde Fashola. We also demonstrated it when Covid-19 struck during our administration of Babajide Sanwo-Olu. 

“The institutional experience, operational capability and capacity are there for us in Lagos, it’s just for us to activate it. I can guarantee that the health family, the first responders, are warming up, in case there’s any form of entry. We pray the entry will be controlled and curtailed by the appropriate authorities, but be rest assured that Lagos State, will respond as always, to any form of strain coming into our dear state.

“The state government is always in communication and partnership with the federal on several issues, not only on Ebola or other health related issues. Lagos State is seriously monitoring the situation.”

Asked if isolation centers are already in place at the borders and the airport in the state, Mr Akosike said, “Isolation centers are not places you can keep forever because they are not regular hospitals but the institutional knowledge is there for us in Lagos and it is for us, a plug and play situation. 

“As we speak, there are meetings going on and people gearing up, especially LASEMA, LASAMBUS, in case we have any entry into the state. I also know that the federal government is working very hard to ensure we don’t have such issue in Nigeria.”

He urged Nigerians to remain vigilant and promptly report any suspected health matters to the appropriate agencies.

Meanwhile, the Commissioner for health, Akin Abayomi, did not respond to enquiries by The Gazette seeking comment.

The World Health Organization (WHO), on May 17, declared the Ebola disease caused by the Bundibugyo virus in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda as a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC).

According to the international health body, while the new deadly Ebola strain has no approved cure or vaccine, the outbreak does not meet the criteria of pandemic emergency as defined by the International Health Regulations.



Continue Reading

Health

Ebola: NCDC warns healthcare workers of ‘high’ importation risk despite no confirmed case

info

Published

on

By

MTN ADVERT

The Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (NCDC) has warned healthcare workers nationwide to heighten surveillance and preparedness for Ebola Virus Disease (EVD), citing a “high” risk of importation into Nigeria due to ongoing outbreaks in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Uganda.

The agency, however, said Nigeria has not recorded any confirmed Ebola case linked to the current regional outbreak as of 28 May.

In a public health advisory issued on Thursday, the NCDC said the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) declaration of the outbreak as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), rising infections in neighbouring African countries, and increased cross-border movement have raised concerns about Nigeria’s vulnerability.

The advisory highlights concerns over delayed detection, healthcare-associated transmission, and the vulnerability of frontline health workers if the virus enters Nigeria.

“This assessment estimated the risk of Ebola importation into Nigeria as high due to the ongoing transmission in the DRC and Uganda, international travel and population movement, uncertainty regarding the full magnitude of the outbreak, and the potential for delayed recognition because symptoms may overlap with endemic diseases such as malaria and Lassa fever,” the agency stated.

PT WHATSAPP CHANNEL

It said high-risk states, border communities, major transport hubs and points of entry had already been identified through its national risk assessment.

Existing outbreak response systems

The NCDC said Nigeria still retains important outbreak response structures developed after previous viral haemorrhagic fever outbreaks, including the 2014 Ebola outbreak, which was successfully contained in Lagos.

According to the agency, the country currently maintains laboratory capability, trained rapid response teams, Emergency Operations Centres (EOCs), established Viral Haemorrhagic Fever preparedness systems, and prior outbreak response experience.

However, it admitted that existing systems require constant review and strengthening.

It also warned healthcare workers that Ebola patients or suspected cases could present at health facilities anywhere in Nigeria.

“The key operational question is therefore how healthcare workers should recognise, respond to, and safely manage such situations,” it said.

The agency stressed that healthcare workers remain one of the most vulnerable groups during Ebola outbreaks because of direct exposure during patient care.

Symptoms

The agency warned that Ebola symptoms may initially resemble several common illnesses frequently seen in Nigerian hospitals, increasing the risk of delayed recognition.

It listed malaria, typhoid fever, Lassa fever, gastroenteritis, COVID-19, influenza, sepsis and other severe bacterial infections among illnesses with symptoms similar to Ebola.

According to the advisory, Ebola has an incubation period of two to 21 days.

Early symptoms may include fever, weakness, headache, muscle pain, sore throat, vomiting and diarrhoea. While severe illness may involve unexplained bleeding, organ dysfunction, confusion, shock and collapse

Patients with non-specific febrile illness could initially appear similar to people suffering from more common diseases, “potentially delaying recognition and increasing exposure risk within healthcare settings.”

No approved vaccine

The current outbreak involves the Bundibugyo strain of the Ebola virus, which differs from the Zaire strain responsible for the 2014 West African epidemic.

The Bundibugyo virus is a Risk Group 4 pathogen and one of the less common Ebola virus strains.

“Unlike the Zaire strain, there are currently no approved vaccines or specific antiviral therapies for Bundibugyo virus disease,” the agency said.

The absence of approved vaccines or targeted therapies could complicate response efforts if infections are detected in Nigeria.

Ebola not airborne

The agency clarified that Ebola is not considered an airborne disease under normal circumstances.

Transmission occurs through direct contact with infected blood, body fluids, secretions, organs, contaminated materials, or infected animals.

The advisory listed vomit, diarrhoea, urine, saliva, sweat, breast milk and semen among infectious body fluids capable of transmitting the virus.

The agency warned that transmission risk is highest when infected patients become symptomatic and actively produce infectious body fluids.

It added that healthcare-associated transmission remained a major concern during Ebola outbreaks, citing reports by the WHO of infections and deaths among healthcare workers linked to gaps in infection prevention and control measures.

READ ALSO: FG releases names of 21 states, FCT at high risk of Ebola infection – FULL LIST

Hospital surveillance

The NCDC directed healthcare facilities to strengthen triage systems for early identification and isolation of suspected cases.

It urged workers to maintain “a high index of suspicion,” especially among persons with recent travel history to affected countries or epidemiological links to confirmed or suspected cases.

It also asked them to carefully assess patients’ travel history, exposure history, contact with sick persons, and attendance at burial or funeral activities where relevant.

It advised hospitals to minimise unnecessary exposure while ensuring safe clinical care.

It also asked the healthcare workers to strictly implement infection prevention and control measures at all times, including hand hygiene before and after patient contact, appropriate use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and safe injection practices.

Others are environmental cleaning and disinfection, safe waste segregation and disposal and safe handling of laboratory specimens.

It further asked to avoid direct contact with blood or body fluids without PPE, prevent needle-stick injuries, follow safe burial guidance, and ensure proper decontamination of equipment and surfaces.

In addition, the health workers are instructed to promptly report occupational exposure incidents and participate in refresher infection prevention and preparedness training programmes.


Continue Reading

Trending