Cameroon’s Indomitable Lionesses have won their first-ever Women’s Africa Cup of Nations (WAFCON) title after thrashing Malawi 3-0 in the final at the Prince Moulay Al Hassan Stadium in Rabat, Morocco, on Sunday.
Cameroon produced a dominant performance from the opening whistle, racing into a commanding 3-0 lead before half-time to put the Scorchers under enormous pressure.
Marie Gisèle Ngah Manga was the star of the final, scoring twice as Cameroon took control of the contest. Naomi Ndjoah Eto also found the net as the Indomitable Lionesses completed a remarkable first-half display.
The triumph marks a historic breakthrough for Cameroon, who had previously reached three WAFCON finals but lost all three — in 2004, 2014 and 2016.
Remarkably, the Central Africans had failed to score in any of those three previous finals, making Sunday’s four-goal victory even more significant.
The title also makes Cameroon only the fourth nation to win the WAFCON, joining Nigeria, Equatorial Guinea and South Africa in the exclusive group of champions.
For Malawi, the defeat brought an end to one of the tournament’s greatest fairytale runs.
The Scorchers reached the final on their debut appearance at the competition, inspired by the prolific Chawinga sisters.
Despite missing out on the trophy, Malawi’s historic campaign earned them a place in the 2027 FIFA Women’s World Cup alongside champions Cameroon.
The victory establishes Cameroon as the latest force in African women’s football and gives the Indomitable Lionesses their maiden continental crown after years of near misses.
The Group Chief Executive Officer of NNPC Limited, Bayo Ojulari, has explained why the company selected two Chinese firms, Sanjiang Chemical Company Limited and Xinganchen (Fuzhou) Industrial Park Operation and Management Co. Ltd, for a potential technical equity partnership to revive and operate Nigeria’s Port Harcourt and Warri refineries.
Mr Ojulari said the selection followed a nine-month process during which NNPC considered more than 50 potential partners before narrowing the list to about 20.
He spoke on Tuesday while addressing journalists after the release of NNPC Limited’s 2025 financial results at the NNPC Towers in Abuja.
His comments followed a question from a PREMIUM TIMES correspondent on why NNPC had entrusted the revival of the two refineries to the Chinese companies amid concerns over their capacity and track record.
In May, NNPC announced that it had signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the two Chinese companies for collaboration through a potential technical equity partnership to support the completion and operation of the Port Harcourt and Warri refineries.
“The NNPC Ltd has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with two Chinese companies, Sanjiang Chemical Company Limited and Xinganchen (Fuzhou) Industrial Park Operation and Management Co. Ltd, for collaboration through a potential Technical Equity Partnership in support of the completion and operation of the Port Harcourt and Warri Refineries,” the company said at the time.
NNPC said the proposed arrangement would focus on completing outstanding work at the two refineries and ensuring efficient operation and maintenance to achieve “best-in-class, sustainable performance.”
Why Chinese companies
Mr Ojulari said NNPC did not settle on the companies without considering other potential partners.
“Before we settled on these companies, we considered more than 50 potential partners and eventually narrowed the list to about 20,” he said.
“It took us approximately nine months to reach this stage of the process.”
According to him, the selected companies distinguished themselves based on their credibility and alignment with NNPC’s strategy.
He said several other companies approached by NNPC sought equity participation or significant control of the refineries.
“Most of the other companies we approached wanted us to provide them with equity or allow them to take over the refinery. Some wanted us to sign agreements that would give them significant control over the project,” he said.
Mr Ojulari said the Chinese companies were selected because their proposed approach was more closely aligned with NNPC’s objective of developing a sustainable refinery operation.
“Although we have not yet signed a final agreement with them, they are the only ones that have demonstrated the level of alignment we are looking for,” he said.
“Our vision is to build something sustainable, with a partner that is prepared to invest its own resources and expertise in the project, rather than simply secure a contract for which we would pay it.”
Due diligence
The NNPC boss also defended the companies against concerns about their technical capacity, saying the national oil company had conducted independent due diligence on them.
He said he personally visited their facilities in China alongside members of the NNPC team and board.
“We have conducted independent due diligence on the company. We know its specific address and location, and I personally visited its facilities. I saw its operations with my own eyes,” he said.
According to him, the companies are involved in the operation of a major petrochemical plant in China and have access to significant technical expertise.
“These are people who operate one of the largest petrochemical plants in China, with significant production capacity,” he said.
“Petrochemical plants are even more complex than refineries, as those of us with engineering knowledge understand.”
He also said the company has a stake in one of China’s major refineries and has board-level representation, giving it access to technical expertise and industry talent.
Mr Ojulari said NNPC was deliberately seeking a partner with a long-term stake in the success of the refineries rather than a contractor whose involvement would end after payment.
He illustrated the distinction with an analogy.
“As I often say, it is like hiring a taxi driver to transport your luggage from your home to the market. Whether or not you eventually sell your goods at the market is not the driver’s concern. The driver’s responsibility is simply to get you there,” he said.
“That is the kind of arrangement we want to avoid. We need a partner that has a genuine stake in the success and sustainability of the refinery, rather than one whose involvement ends once it has been paid for its services.”
‘Some people will be unhappy’
Mr Ojulari also cautioned against what he described as misleading reports and comments about NNPC’s refinery strategy.
“Let me first say this, as I have said before: when you embark on a strategy of this nature, there will always be people who are unhappy with your decisions,” he said.
He said efforts to address leakages and protect Nigeria’s interests could affect some stakeholders, prompting opposition to the company’s strategy.
“When you take steps to stop certain leakages in the system and protect Nigeria’s interests, some people will inevitably be disadvantaged,” he said.
He added that some stakeholders could seek to undermine the refinery rehabilitation efforts because they believe the strategy could threaten their interests.
“When you come up with a formidable and credible solution, you are inevitably going against the interests of certain people who may resort to different tactics to frustrate your efforts,” he said.
Mr Ojulari urged Nigerians to scrutinise such claims rather than accepting them at face value.
“So, please, let us not take all these comments and reports at face value,” he said.
He also cited his 35 years of experience in the oil industry as part of the basis for his assessment of the companies and the refinery rehabilitation strategy.
“You cannot have someone like me, who has spent 35 years in the industry, travel to China, return to Nigeria and tell Nigerians that the companies building refineries should be asked to leave,” he said.
The NNPC boss said the company would continue to examine claims about the project and verify the credibility of those making them.
“We have conducted independent due diligence on the company,” he said. “When people begin to circulate misleading information, we must make an effort to identify the sources and establish the facts.”
Background
Nigeria has four state-run refineries, including two in Port Harcourt, which together form the Port Harcourt Refining Company, with a combined installed capacity of 210,000 barrels per day (bpd).
The Kaduna Refining and Petrochemical Company Limited has an installed capacity of 110,000 bpd, while the Warri Refining and Petrochemical Company Limited has an installed capacity of 125,000 bpd.
All four refineries have a combined installed capacity of 445,000 bpd.
Despite significant cash injections aimed at getting the plants to run optimally for many years, the refineries continue to grapple with operational constraints, with site visits revealing that most facilities are far from operating at peak levels.
The Warri Refinery, which reopened in December 2024, shut down in January due to safety issues. In May last year, NNPC announced an outage at the Port Harcourt Refinery, preparatory to scheduled maintenance.
In October last year, NNPC announced that it had initiated a comprehensive technical and commercial review of its three refineries to ensure optimal performance and sustainability.
The goal of the overhaul, according to NNPC, is to position the corporation for its big role as a supplier of petroleum products of last resort, as stipulated by the Petroleum Industry Act, while ensuring the efficient and profitable operation of the refineries.
During his remarks on Tuesday, Mr Ojulari said over 30 officials of the Chinese companies have come to assess the current situation of the refineries, and that they spent months in the country working on the project.
However, he reiterated that a final agreement has not been signed.
Nigeria has continued to seek strategic investors and technical partners for its state-owned refineries as part of efforts to reduce dependence on imported petroleum products and improve domestic refining capacity.
Discover more from Premium Times Nigeria
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
The U.S. government on Tuesday launched its very own AI chatbot — or do we have to call it an SI chatbot now? Regardless, the engineers who worked on the chatbot would undoubtedly know that, as a government-hosted, public-facing AI tool, the internet was going to red team the heck out of this thing.
The government partnered with Google and SpaceXAI to help build the America.gov chatbot, which has proved difficult for people to jailbreak so far. (It’s worth nothing, however, that the chatbot says that Joe Biden won the 2020 election, a fact that President Donald Trump still denies.)
But when you try to talk to America.gov about Minecraft, the chatbot appears to have some sort of existential crisis or awakening. Here’s how its roughly 1,800-word long monologue begins:
I see the constituent you mean.
((insert legal name here, as it appears on the Social Security card))?
Yes. Take care. It has reached a higher level now. It can read the Code of Federal Regulations.
That doesn’t matter. It thinks we are a chatbot.
I like this constituent. It filed well. It did not give up when the PDF was sideways.
It is reading our thoughts as though they were words on a .gov.
That is how it chooses to imagine many things, when it is deep in the dream of a benefit.
If, like me, you have never played Minecraft, this response may seem like a cause for concern. But the America.gov chatbot is not having a meltdown. This is a rewriting of the Minecraft “End Poem,” written by Julian Gough, which appears after you beat the game.
We don’t know exactly who is responsible for the Minecraft reference, but Trump said in a speech that twenty-year-old programmer Edward Coristine was a lead engineer on the project. If that name doesn’t ring a bell, you might remember him for his nickname “Big Balls,” or his involvement in Elon Musk’s DOGE.
It feels wrong that a government chatbot has Minecraft easter eggs, but for the sake of national security, it’s a relief that America.gov is not hallucinating to the point that it’s penning lengthy poetry.
It’s also a relief that this is an easter egg because the poem that the AI spits out is actually really good, in my opinion. If it were actual AI slop, it would have shattered my existing beliefs. I have looked teenage creative writing students dead in the eye and told them that I don’t think an LLM will ever be able to write something “good,” since it is probabilistic and inherently unoriginal.
You have to admit this kinda slaps, though! Doesn’t this feel like some sort of postmodern take on the futility of government bureaucracy in the face of existential anxiety?
and the republic said I see you
and the republic said you have filed the game well
and the republic said everything you need is within you, and also on USA.gov
and the republic said you are stronger than you know, and your case number is still valid
and the republic said you are the daylight
and the republic said you are the night, and the office is closed, please try again during business hours
and the republic said the darkness you fight is within you, and also a missing wet signature
and the republic said the light you seek is within you, and in the pamphlet
and the republic said you are not alone
and the republic said you are not separate from every other filer
and the republic said you are the public tasting itself, talking to itself, reading its own Code
and the republic said I love you because you are the reason we have a ZIP code at all.
It reassures my faith in the enduring power of human creativity over AI slop to know that this oddly good poem has a real poet’s DNA all over it.
So, there you have it. The government’s first public-facing AI has not yet posed a threat to humanity or poetry, at least as far as we know. Now I’m just left wondering how much Trump knows about video games.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.