Connect with us

Health

Doctors Warn of Risky Pregnancy Spacing Trend Threatening Mothers and Newborns

info

Published

on

Teenage Pregnancy.jpg

Medical experts in maternal health have raised concerns over increasingly short intervals between pregnancies, warning that the trend poses serious risks to both mothers and newborns.

The doctors, who spoke to a health publication, said women—especially those who delivered via caesarean section (CS)—are at higher risk when they conceive too soon after childbirth, stressing that the body needs sufficient time to recover before another pregnancy.

They recommended a minimum spacing of 24 months before conception after childbirth, noting that inadequate recovery time can lead to complications such as uterine scar rupture, anaemia, excessive bleeding, premature birth, poor foetal growth and, in severe cases, stillbirth.

The experts explained that women who have undergone CS are medically classified as high-risk, even when they appear healthy after delivery, due to the possibility of internal complications that may not be immediately visible.

They also warned against the growing influence of unverified health advice circulating on social media, urging women to rely strictly on guidance from qualified medical professionals.

The concern comes amid the emergence of a growing trend popularly referred to as “two-under-two,” where women have children in very rapid succession. According to the experts, such patterns may contribute to Nigeria’s already high rates of maternal and infant mortality if not properly addressed.

A Professor of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at the University of Uyo, Aniekan Abasiattai, explained that the uterus must fully heal after a caesarean section before another pregnancy is attempted.

He warned that if the surgical scar is not fully healed, it may rupture during labour, creating a life-threatening emergency for both mother and child.

He further noted that women who do not observe adequate spacing after CS are often advised against vaginal delivery in subsequent pregnancies, meaning repeat surgical delivery becomes necessary.

Beyond scar-related risks, he said short birth intervals increase the likelihood of anaemia, gestational diabetes, placenta complications and postpartum haemorrhage, particularly among women who are already medically vulnerable.

Another expert, Abubakar Panti, described short birth spacing as a major public health concern in Nigeria, warning that it continues to contribute to preventable maternal and infant health complications.

He advised that women should maintain at least a 24-month gap between childbirth and the next pregnancy, which translates to about three years between successive births for optimal health outcomes.

Panti added that closely spaced pregnancies place significant physical strain on breastfeeding mothers and increase risks such as preterm birth, low birth weight, and newborn complications.

He identified poor contraceptive use, cultural expectations for rapid childbearing, and late marriages as key drivers of unsafe birth spacing practices.

While acknowledging concerns about declining fertility among some women, he stressed that the medical risks of rapid successive pregnancies far outweigh such fears.

Both experts called for stronger integration of postpartum family planning into maternal healthcare services, as well as intensified public awareness campaigns to educate women on safe pregnancy spacing and its importance for maternal and child survival.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Health

Ebola: Africa CDC assures patient confidentiality amid contact tracing

info

Published

on

41225 Africa CDC Logo EN.png

The Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) has assured the public that patients’ personal information will remain confidential during ongoing Ebola containment operations, as authorities work to trace people who may have been exposed to the disease.

Wessam Mankoula, an epidemiologist and the agency’s Director of Emergency Preparedness and Response, gave the assurance during a virtual press briefing on Thursday. He explained that patients’ information was shared only with authorised investigators conducting contact tracing.

He said the information would not be disclosed publicly, emphasising the importance of protecting patients’ privacy during outbreak investigations.

The assurance follows the Nigerian government’s confirmation on Tuesday of an Ebola case in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT).

The patient, a woman who recently arrived in Nigeria on an international flight from Uganda, is receiving medical care in isolation at a private hospital in the FCT.

Contact tracing

Mr Mankoula said Nigeria’s National Reference Laboratory confirmed that the imported case involved the Bundibugyo strain of the Ebola virus.

PT WHATSAPP CHANNEL
Dangote Refinery AD

He said 44 high-risk contacts had been identified, and the government was working to identify others who might have been exposed.

Contact tracing involves identifying and monitoring people who may have been in contact with an infected person, so possible infections can be detected early and further transmission limited.

Mr Mankoula also said investigators were examining a possible link between the Nigerian case and a case in Kenya. Both individuals had travelled through Entebbe International Airport in Uganda on 3 October.

He stressed that a connection remained under investigation and had not been established.

READ ALSO: Ebola: FG orders strict screening at Nigeria’s entry points

Regional response

Mr Mankoula said Africa CDC was working with partners, including the WHO, to strengthen disease surveillance and support preparedness measures. These included providing testing supplies at border areas near the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).

Nigeria’s case comes amid an Ebola outbreak in the DRC involving the Bundibugyo virus.

According to figures attributed to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), the DRC had recorded 9,552 confirmed cases and 4,602 related deaths as of 19 October, based on data up to 18 October.

The outbreak has affected 66 of the country’s 178 health zones across eight provinces, with Ituri the most affected province.

These developments have heightened concerns about Ebola’s cross-border spread and the need for countries to strengthen surveillance, laboratory testing and coordination to identify suspected cases promptly.

Africa CDC continues to work with national health authorities and international partners to support outbreak response efforts and limit further transmission.


Discover more from Premium Times Nigeria

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Health

Ebola: Swiss government says Nigeria’s patient likely contracted virus in Uganda

info

Published

on

Ebola case in DR Congo.jpg

Nigeria’s first confirmed Ebola patient in more than a decade is believed to have contracted the virus while travelling in Uganda, although health authorities are yet to establish the source of her infection.

According to a report by Reuters, the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs told the newspaper in an emailed statement on Thursday that the patient, a Ugandan-born woman married to a Swiss diplomat based in Abuja, has been receiving treatment at a private clinic in the Nigerian capital for about a week.

According to Reuters, the statement said the woman was believed to have contracted the virus during a visit to Uganda about two weeks earlier. Her husband, who travelled with her, is in isolation but has not developed symptoms.

However, the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) said they had not received verified information that the woman travelled to the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), where the current Ebola outbreak began.

Conflicting travel accounts

According to Reuters, Ugandan authorities had earlier said the woman travelled to eastern DRC before transiting through Uganda.

However, Africa CDC official Wessam Mankoula said on Thursday that there was no validated information confirming that the patient had travelled to the DRC.

PT WHATSAPP CHANNEL
Dangote Refinery AD

Mr Mankoula said Nigeria and Uganda were exchanging information to reconstruct her travel history and identify the possible source of infection.

WHO representative to Nigeria Pavel Ursu said the information received by the agency indicated that the woman had been in Uganda from 16 September and returned to Abuja on 3 October.

The WHO official said the information available to the agency did not establish that she had travelled outside Uganda.

Patrick Otim, a WHO emergency response manager, also said the source of the infection remained unknown as investigators worked to establish the patient’s movements before she became ill.

One area of investigation is the health facilities the woman visited in Abuja after developing symptoms and before she was hospitalised, including the possibility of exposure to other people during that period, he said.

Meanwhile, the Ugandan government said that the country had no active Ebola cases.

Uganda recorded 20 Ebola cases between May and June, most of them linked to infections imported from the DRC. The WHO declared the country’s outbreak over in August after 42 days without a new confirmed case.

Nigeria’s response

The uncertainty surrounding the woman’s travel history comes as Nigeria works to prevent further transmission following confirmation of the imported infection on 20 October.

As PREMIUM TIMES reported, the patient is a 42-year-old woman who lives in Abuja and recently travelled to Uganda. She developed symptoms on 6 October, three days after returning to Nigeria, and initially sought treatment at a private hospital, believing she had malaria.

She later visited another private hospital, where she was admitted on 11 October after her condition failed to improve. Her infection was subsequently confirmed through laboratory testing.

PREMIUM TIMES also reported that health authorities had identified 44 people who might have been exposed to the patient, including healthcare workers, patients, caregivers and travel contacts.

The government has begun contact tracing and is working with international partners to establish the woman’s movements and identify anyone who may have been exposed.

The WHO has urged Nigerians to remain calm, explaining that one confirmed imported case does not, by itself, mean the country is experiencing an Ebola ‘outbreak’. The agency is supporting Nigeria with case investigation, laboratory testing, contact tracing and infection prevention measures.

Regional outbreak

Nigeria’s case comes amid an Ebola outbreak that was declared in the DRC in May and has spread to other African countries, raising concerns about cross-border transmission.

The outbreak is caused by the Bundibugyo virus, a species of Ebola virus for which there is currently no licensed vaccine.

Kenya has also reported cases linked to the movement of the virus across borders, adding to concerns about the challenges of tracing infections among international travellers.

Ebola spreads through direct contact with the blood or other bodily fluids of an infected person, or with contaminated materials. Symptoms may include fever, headache, weakness, vomiting and diarrhoea.


Discover more from Premium Times Nigeria

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Trending