Connect with us

News

Liverpool vs Chelsea preview, prediction, team news and head-to-head

info

Published

on

B9be590d 29a3 42f1 9335 eccde04f6591.webp

 

Liverpool can book a top-five finish in the Premier League table when they host Chelsea in Saturday’s early kickoff at Anfield.

Liverpool vs Chelsea betting tips

  • Under 3.5 goals
  • Both teams to score
  • Liverpool to win

Liverpool vs Chelsea preview

Liverpool and Chelsea will get the ball rolling for this weekend’s round of Premier League fixtures as they clash at Anfield.

It is a big game for both sides, but for contrasting reasons as they bid to bounce back from defeats to Manchester United and Nottingham Forest respectively.

The reigning champions’ winning streak came to an end in an agonising 3-2 loss to Manchester United last weekend, shortly before the Blues’ 3-1 home reverse to Nottingham Forest – a sorry sixth straight top-flight defeat.

Liverpool are fourth in the Premier League table with 58 points, six clear of Bournemouth and seven above Brentford. They will qualify for the 2026-27 Champions League if they beat Chelsea and the Cherries drop points at Fulham.

A draw could also be enough depending on how Bournemouth, Brentford and Brighton get on.

As for Chelsea, they will be desperate to end a run of six consecutive Premier League defeats and build some confidence ahead of next weekend’s FA Cup showdown against Manchester City.

Points seem a largely foreign concept to Chelsea in the Premier League right now, and they head to Merseyside as the most out-of-form team in the division.

 

The ninth-placed Blues are mathematically out of top-five contention, sitting 10 points adrift of Aston Villa with three games remaining.

However, they are just four points off Bournemouth in sixth, which could suffice for UCL qualification if Villa finish in the top five and win the Europa League, though they risk no longer being in contention if results go against them this weekend.

Liverpool vs Chelsea head-to-head

Chelsea beat Liverpool twice at Stamford Bridge in 2025, most recently a 2-1 success in October.

However, the Reds have won their last two meetings at Anfield, including last season’s Mohamed Salah-inspired triumph by the same scoreline.

Following their 2-1 win at Stamford Bridge in October, Chelsea are looking to complete the league double over Liverpool for the first time since 2013/14.

However, Chelsea have won just one of their last 10 away games against Liverpool (D5 L4), a 1-0 win under Thomas Tuchel in March 2021.

Liverpool vs Chelsea team forms

Liverpool Premier League form: 🟧🟥🟩🟩🟩🟥

Liverpool form (all competitions): 🟥🟩🟥🟩🟩🟥

Chelsea Premier League form: 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥

Liverpool form (all competitions): 🟩🟥🟥🟥🟩🟥

Liverpool vs Chelsea team news

Liverpool are hopeful Alexander Isak and Alisson Becker will be available for selection after injury.

Both players missed the defeat at Old Trafford, with Isak suffering a minor groin issue. Arne Slot said last week that he expected the Swede to return against Chelsea, and Alisson is not thought to be too far away from a comeback.

However, the Chelsea game may come too soon for Mohamed Salah, who is likely to play at least one more game before bidding farewell.

 

Hugo Ekitike, Conor Bradley and Giovanni Leoni are all long-term injury casualties, and Giorgi Mamardashvili remains sidelined.

As for Chelsea, the loss to Forest was overshadowed by the sickening head injury to teenage attacker Jesse Derry, who was stretchered off to warm applause from both sets of supporters after his collision with Zach Abbott.

Derry-Abbott was one of two head clashes at Stamford Bridge, where Robert Sanchez and Morgan Gibbs-White also crashed into each other, so Filip Jorgensen may be required in between the posts in the former’s place.

McFarlane is at least hopeful of having attacking trio Pedro Neto, Alejandro Garnacho and Jamie Gittens fit for the weekend, but Estevao Willian (thigh) and Mykhaylo Mudryk (doping ban) will play no part.

Liverpool vs Chelsea possible starting lineup

Liverpool: Woodman; Jones, Van Dijk, Konate, Kerkez; Gravenberch, Szoboszlai; Frimpong, Wirtz, Ngumoha; Gakpo

Chelsea: Jorgensen; James, Colwill, Chalobah, Cucurella; Caicedo, Santos; Palmer, Fernandez, Neto; Pedro

Liverpool vs Chelsea prediction

Liverpool are not without their problems, but Chelsea’s Premier League season is ending catastrophically, and McFarlane’s men could return to scoreless ways on Saturday.

Arne Slot’s side had put together a three-game winning run prior to defeat at Old Trafford, and while a classic is surely not in store, given their fitness issues, they’re ahead of Chelsea who have lost their last six in the league.

FA Cup wins aside, the Blues have looked poor in recent weeks and we can’t see that changing here. Form suggests this should be a routine Liverpool win.

Correct score prediction: Liverpool 2-1 Chelsea 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Nigeria’s Men’s U20 Handball Team Cherishes Third Place Finish At Continental Championship In Cote d’Ivoire 

info

Published

on

By

IMG 20260913 WA0196.jpg

Players, coaches and officials in Nigeria’s under-20 men’s team are cherishing their third place finish at the 33rd Africa Men’s Junior Handball Championship in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire.

Sports247 reports that the achievement came after the squad beat Angola 24-19 in their third-place encounter on Saturday, which Coach David Emmanuel’s side dominated from the start.

The Nigerians took a huge 13-6 lead into half-time, following which they maintained their grip on the game in the second stanza to secure a five-goal victory margin, despite a late surge from the Angolans.

This consolation win came a day after the Nigerians lost the semi-final 44-23 to Tunisia, who clinched a spot in the final after dominating the opening half and went into half time with a 23-11 lead.

The Nigerians put up a gallant fightback in the second half, but Tunisia stood strong to secure their passage into the final, while Nigeria battled Angola with a view towards ending their run with a bronze medal.

Top shots of Handball Federation of Nigeria (HFN) also celebrated what has been regarded as a highly successful outing by Coach Emmanuel’s squad, as they picked a podium spot after qualifying for the global championship with their surge to the last-four in Abidjan.

HFN’s media commission vice-chairman, Cosmos Chukwuemeka Akisi disclosed, “Angola had defeated Nigeria 25-20 in the group stage of the competition which ensured that Coach Emmanuel boys finished second behind the Southern Africa’ side.

“The bronze medal caps an impressive campaign for the Nigerian youngsters, who had earlier secured qualification for the 2027 IHF Men’s U21 Handball World Championship in North Macedonia after defeating Guinea 28-23 in the quarter-finals.

“Nigeria has also qualified for the IHF Trophy Intercontinental Phase by the virtue of their ranking above all other countries in the IHF Trophy Africa Phase in the Championship.”

Continue Reading

Business

CPPE warns against return to petrol subsidy, proposes targeted relief

info

Published

on

By

468939862 570688608903404 8583644854384931658 n.jpg

MTN ADVERT

The Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise (CPPE) has cautioned against restoring the petrol subsidy, describing the policy as fiscally unsustainable despite the severe economic pressures caused by rising petrol prices.

The private-sector advocacy group, in a policy brief signed by its Chief Executive Officer, Muda Yusuf, on Sunday, said the recent escalation in petrol prices had increased transportation, logistics and production costs, weakening consumers’ purchasing power.

It added that the recent increase in fuel prices also worsened the competitiveness challenges confronting businesses, particularly micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs).

CPPE’s position comes amid renewed calls for a return to fuel subsidy, including a pledge by former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar to restore a targeted petrol subsidy if elected in 2027.

The organisation said the subsidy debate should not be reduced to the issue of pump prices, arguing that it has wider implications for Nigeria’s fiscal sustainability, foreign exchange stability, investment, domestic refining, industrialisation, employment and energy security.

PT WHATSAPP CHANNEL

“The central policy question is therefore not whether Nigeria should return to the old subsidy regime, but how to preserve the gains of the reform while reducing its social costs and translating the resulting fiscal space into tangible improvements in citizens’ welfare,” CPPE said.

Subsidy regime

According to the think tank, Nigeria previously spent an estimated $10 billion to $15 billion annually on petroleum-product imports before the subsidy reform.

It said subsidy and under-recovery obligations also consumed significant public resources, constrained remittances to the Federation Account and intensified fiscal pressures.

CPPE said artificially low domestic petrol prices also encouraged arbitrage and cross-border diversion, effectively resulting in Nigerian public resources subsidising fuel consumption outside the country.

“The old regime was therefore not merely a subsidy problem; it was a major fiscal, foreign-exchange and resource-allocation problem,” the think tank said.

Domestic refining

The group said the shift to market-based petrol pricing had improved the commercial viability of domestic refining by creating stronger investment incentives in the sector.

The think tank argued that a competitive domestic refining industry would generate opportunities beyond petrol production, including in diesel, aviation fuel, petrochemicals, fertiliser, plastics, chemicals, logistics, storage and maritime services.

“Domestic refining also conserves foreign exchange through import substitution, creates export opportunities and retains refining, engineering, logistics and technical jobs within the Nigerian economy,” CPPE said.

It urged Nigeria to pursue the transition from dependence on imported petroleum products to becoming “a competitive regional refining and petrochemical hub.”

CPPE acknowledged that subsidy removal had increased revenues available to the federal, state and local governments but said higher government revenues alone could not justify the reform.

“Citizens must see tangible benefits through improved public transportation, electricity, healthcare, education, food security, infrastructure and social protection,” it said.

The organisation said the debate should now focus increasingly on fiscal accountability and the quality of government spending.

It called on the three tiers of government to transparently demonstrate how the additional resources arising from the reform were being used to improve economic and social outcomes.

Global oil shock

The group also stressed the need to distinguish the price increase associated with subsidy removal from more recent increases attributed to movements in global crude oil and refined-product prices.

According to CPPE, petrol was selling at about N774 to N800 per litre before the latest escalation in international energy prices, while prices subsequently rose above N1,300 per litre amid what it described as a sharp increase in global energy prices linked to the Middle East crisis.

“It would therefore be incorrect to attribute the entirety of the latest petrol-price increase to subsidy removal,” the organisation said.

The think tank described the two developments as separate issues requiring different policy responses: the first, a domestic structural reform involving the transition to market-based pricing, and the second, an external commodity price shock.

N20 trillion subsidy bill

CPPE said restoring a universal petrol subsidy could recreate the fiscal and foreign-exchange pressures that prompted the reform.

Using an estimated petrol consumption benchmark of 50 million litres per day and an indicative subsidy requirement of N1,050 per litre, the organisation estimated that the potential subsidy exposure could amount to about ₦ 152.5 billion daily, N1.575 trillion monthly, and approximately N19.16 trillion annually.

It described the figure as an annual burden of about N20 trillion, while acknowledging that the actual cost would depend on factors including consumption, crude oil prices, exchange rates, refining or landing costs, and the regulated pump price.

CPPE also warned that consumption could increase under a subsidy regime as price differentials could recreate incentives for cross-border diversion.

“An annual subsidy bill approaching N20 trillion would impose an enormous opportunity cost,” it said.

According to the organisation, such spending could compete with funding for infrastructure, education, healthcare, security, agriculture and social protection, while potentially widening the fiscal deficit and increasing borrowing and debt-service pressures.

It further warned that increased government borrowing could crowd out private-sector credit, sustain high interest rates and weaken investment, productivity, job creation and economic growth.

“Nigeria would therefore risk replacing an energy-price problem with a much larger fiscal, debt, foreign-exchange and investment problem,” CPPE said.

Targeted relief

Rather than restoring the the petrol subsidy, the organisation urged the government to implement targeted interventions to reduce household vulnerability and business costs.

It recommended expanding affordable public transportation, rail freight, and logistics infrastructure; improving electricity supply; accelerating compressed natural gas (CNG), solar, and distributed energy solutions; and strengthening food production through improved agricultural security, irrigation, rural infrastructure, and logistics.

CPPE also called for targeted support for vulnerable households, improved public healthcare and education, and measures to reduce energy, logistics and financing costs for productive enterprises, particularly MSMEs.

READ ALSO: CPPE urges NMDPRA to tie petrol imports to verified supply gaps

It urged the government to maintain a predictable, market-oriented framework for the downstream petroleum sector to protect investor confidence and encourage further investment in domestic refining.

“The appropriate policy direction is to preserve the downstream petroleum reforms while aggressively mitigating their social and economic costs,” the organisation said.

CPPE said the fiscal gains from subsidy removal must become more visible through infrastructure, public services and productive investment, alongside greater transparency and accountability in the utilisation of additional revenues accruing to the federal, state and local governments.

“The subsidy debate should therefore move beyond the binary question of whether petrol subsidy should be restored.

“The more consequential issue is how Nigeria can convert the gains of the reform into lower structural costs, stronger domestic production, improved competitiveness, greater energy security and measurable improvements in citizens’ welfare,” it said.

The organisation said the recommendations would make the reform “economically sustainable and socially defensible.”

Nigeria’s petrol subsidy was removed in May 2023 after President Bola Tinubu announced during his inauguration on 29 May that “the fuel subsidy is gone.”

The announcement effectively ended the government’s previous system of subsidising petrol costs, prompting the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC Ltd) to adjust pump prices nationwide in June 2023.

The reform was intended to reduce the government’s financial burden from subsidising petrol.


Discover more from Premium Times Nigeria

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Trending