Connect with us

News

Hausa-Fulani Leaders Oppose Governor Mutfwang’s Call for Military Withdrawal in Plateau

editor

Published

on

Mutfwang

Leaders of the Muslim and Hausa-Fulani communities in Plateau State have strongly rejected Governor Caleb Mutfwang’s call for the withdrawal of soldiers from peacekeeping operations across the state, warning that such a move could endanger their lives and further escalate tensions.

In a statement issued on Sunday and signed by Elder Sani Mudi, the group voiced deep concern over the governor’s position, alleging that Muslims and Fulani people are already being unfairly targeted and marginalized in the ongoing crises.

“We, Muslims and Hausa-Fulani leaders, express fears that the call for the removal of soldiers from peacekeeping operations is mischievous and a grand plan to give room to some people to execute their evil plans of ridding Plateau of the presence of Hausa and Fulani, regarded as unwanted settlers in the state,” the statement read in part.

The group accused some actors of exploiting the situation to incite ethnic and religious hostility and urged the government to focus on addressing the root causes of conflict in the state, rather than demanding military withdrawal from volatile areas.

They referenced the 2008 post-election violence in Jos, claiming that during the unrest, hundreds of innocent Muslims were allegedly killed by individuals disguised in police uniforms. The leaders said such experiences heighten their fears and justify the need for a continued military presence to prevent further bloodshed.

“We have seen how our rights and very existence have been violated in the past. The solution is not the withdrawal of troops, but a commitment to genuine peace building and fairness to all ethnic and religious groups in Plateau State,” the statement added.

The group reiterated their willingness to work with the government and other stakeholders for lasting peace but insisted that security forces must not be withdrawn until communities feel safe and protected.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

ICJ Affirms Right to Strike as Global Landmark Victory, Sparks Debate Between Labor and NECA

info

Published

on

By

IMG 4792.jpeg

BY NKECHI NAECHE-ESEZOBOR—The organized labor movement on Monday hailed a recent ruling by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) confirming that the right to strike is implicit in Convention 87 as a landmark victory for workers worldwide.

However, the ruling has sparked a fresh domestic debate, with labor representatives strongly criticizing the Nigeria Employers’ Consultative Association (NECA) for attempting to downplay the judgment’s impact.

The controversy escalated following a television appearance by the Director-General of NECA, Mr. Adewale Smatt-Oyerinde.

Speaking on TVC, Oyerinde argued that the right to strike is not automatic and asserted that workers must still adhere strictly to existing local labor laws, specifically citing Section 43 of the Trade Dispute Act (TDA).

He also suggested that a meeting of social partners to establish complimentary conditions remains a necessary precondition before any strike action can be declared.

Labor representatives quickly fired back, labeling Oyerinde’s remarks as an “unnecessary academic exercise in futility” and a selective interpretation of international law. Critics accused the NECA boss of being economical with the historical background of the dispute, pointing out that the issue had already undergone exhaustive debate across various levels of the International Labour Organization (ILO).

The legal battle began when the global Employers’ Group challenged whether the right to strike was protected under Convention 87.

After the ILO Governing Board affirmed the right through a majority decision, the Employers’ Group appealed the matter to the ICJ. As the highest judicial body in the world, the ICJ’s subsequent ruling in favor of workers is considered definitive and legally binding.

Labor advocates emphasize that Nigeria ratified Convention 87 in 1960, signaling a long-standing commitment to its principles. They argue that following the ICJ’s conclusive verdict, both the Nigerian government and employer bodies like NECA are obligated to obey the law unconditionally rather than selectively hiding behind local statutes to weaken workers’ rights.

Reassuring the public and the business community, labor stakeholders maintained that a strike has never been the first option for workers, but rather a last resort. They cautioned that an adversarial interpretation of the ICJ ruling by employers would only harm industrial harmony, urging instead for mutual respect and total adherence to international legal frameworks to guide future industrial relations in Nigeria.

The post ICJ Affirms Right to Strike as Global Landmark Victory, Sparks Debate Between Labor and NECA appeared first on Business Today NG.

Continue Reading

News

What happens when companies become too AI-pilled?

info

Published

on

By

2244026103.jpg

The people deciding that AI can replace your job are also the ones least likely to understand what your job truly involves, according to Box founder Aaron Levie, who pointed to this as an example of “AI psychosis.” Indeed, ClickUp recently cut 22% of its workforce for AI agents, tech layoffs in 2026 are already nearly matching all of 2025, and DuckDuckGo installs are climbing from users who want Google to stop forcing AI into search and just give them links. 

Watch as TechCrunch’s Equity podcast hosts Kirsten Korosec, Anthony Ha, and Sean O’Kane dig into what happens when the AI-pilled and the AI-skeptical are both right at the same time, plus three deals worth knowing about and Waymo’s new robotaxi hitting the road. 

Subscribe to Equity on YouTube, Apple Podcasts, Overcast, Spotify and all the casts. You also can follow Equity on X and Threads, at @EquityPod. 

Continue Reading

Trending