The BPO industry has embraced AI as a technology capable of improving operational efficiency, enhancing customer experiences, and supporting business growth. But inside South African call centres, the opposite is quietly happening.
As AI tools become deeply embedded into customer engagement environments, many operators are discovering that the real cost of AI is not the software licence – it’s the infrastructure required to run it.
From voice neutralisation software and real time call assistance to AI driven first line support and live agent coaching, the processing demands inside modern BPO environments have increased dramatically over the past 18 months.
What many providers underestimated was the backend impact. AI does not run for free. It requires compute power, memory, networking throughput, low latency environments, and increasingly expensive infrastructure to support it at scale.
The result is that many BPOs are now facing a difficult and expensive decision. One approach is to run AI workloads directly on endpoint devices. This means moving away from standard workstation deployments toward higher specification machines capable of handling AI assisted applications locally.
In practical terms, this is driving a noticeable shift away from traditional Intel i5 deployments toward growing demand for i7 powered devices on the call centre floor. AI enhanced workloads are forcing hardware upgrades far earlier than many refresh cycles originally planned for.
The second option is to keep endpoint devices relatively standard while shifting the AI processing burden into the backend environment. In this model, AI applications and workloads are hosted centrally on servers, reducing the processing demand on the user device itself. While this avoids large scale desktop upgrades, it introduces a different problem – significantly increased server infrastructure requirements.
This is where many BPOs are starting to feel the financial pressure. Backend server environments capable of supporting AI driven workloads require substantially higher compute density, increased storage performance, more advanced networking, and far greater scalability than traditional call centre infrastructure.
The cost of expanding on premises server stacks to accommodate these workloads is rising rapidly, particularly as demand for AI capable hardware continues to grow globally.
According to Gartner, worldwide spending on AI optimised servers is accelerating sharply as organisations race to support enterprise AI workloads, contributing to overall global IT spending reaching $6.15 trillion in 2026.
The third route many organisations are exploring is moving AI infrastructure off premises entirely through hyperscale providers such as Amazon Web Services or colocation environments like Teraco. In this model, the infrastructure is rented rather than owned, with AI workloads hosted externally and delivered to the BPO environment through cloud or hosted platforms.
While this removes the burden of large upfront infrastructure investment, it introduces ongoing rental and operational expenditure costs that must be managed carefully over time. For some BPOs, this creates far greater flexibility. For others, especially those operating at scale with strict latency and compliance requirements, the long-term cost equation becomes more complex.
What is becoming increasingly clear is that AI is fundamentally changing the economics of the BPO industry. For years, cost optimisation in call centres focused largely on labour efficiency. Today, infrastructure efficiency is becoming equally important.
The conversation is shifting from simply how many agents a BPO can support, to how much compute power it takes to support them effectively in an AI enabled environment. This is why the traditional procurement model is coming under pressure. Many operators still attempt to purchase server infrastructure outright through large capital expenditure projects.
But in a market where AI workloads are evolving rapidly, hardware demands are changing constantly, and infrastructure pricing remains volatile, locking large amounts of capital into fixed infrastructure is becoming increasingly risky.
A growing number of BPOs are instead exploring leasing and rental models for backend AI infrastructure. Rather than purchasing expensive server environments upfront, providers can deploy infrastructure through operational expenditure models that spread costs over time while maintaining flexibility as AI requirements evolve.
This approach also reduces the risk of overinvesting in hardware that may become insufficient or obsolete far sooner than traditional infrastructure cycles allowed for. In an AI driven environment, scalability and adaptability are becoming more valuable than ownership itself.
The uncomfortable reality is that AI is not automatically reducing operational costs inside BPOs. In many cases, it is increasing them. The difference is that the costs are shifting away from people and moving into infrastructure.
That changes everything, because the next competitive battle in the BPO industry may not be about who has the cheapest labour model. It may be about who can afford to power AI at scale.
About author: Sanjay Govender is Head of GBS/BPO Solutions at Qrent.
Stay ahead with real-time reports, breaking news, and exclusive insights delivered directly to your phone. Don’t settle for outdated information. Join TECHNOLOGYTIMES NEWS on WhatsApp for 24/7 updates.
Sovereign Trust Insurance Plc alhas received its RecapitalisationCertificate from the National Insurance Commission (NAICOM), marking a significant milestone in the Company’s ongoing growth and transformation journey.
The certificate, issued following the Company’s successful compliance with the recapitalisation requirements of the National Insurance Commission, further reinforces Sovereign Trust Insurance Plc’s financial capacity, operational resilience and commitment to delivering sustainable value to its policyholders and other stakeholders.
Speaking on the development, the Managing Director/Chief Executive Officer of Sovereign Trust Insurance Plc, Dr. Lucas Durojaiye, expressed delight at the milestone, describing it as a testament to the Company’s resilience, strategic focus and the confidence of its stakeholders.
“The receipt of our recapitalisation certificate from NAICOM is a significant milestone for Sovereign Trust Insurance Plc. It reflects the strength of our business, the confidence of our shareholders and the dedication of our Board and employees to building a stronger and more resilient insurance institution.
“This achievement positions us for the next phase of our growth journey. We remain committed to strengthening our capacity to underwrite risks, deepening our market presence, enhancing our service delivery and creating greater value for our policyholders and stakeholders.
The recapitalisation milestone also underscores STI’s commitment to supporting the development of Nigeria’s insurance industry by maintaining strong corporate governance, improving operational efficiency and providing innovative insurance solutions that respond to the evolving needs of individuals, businesses and institutions.
With the certification, Sovereign Trust Insurance Plc is poised to further leverage its strengthened capital base to pursue strategic growth opportunities, enhance its underwriting capacity and reinforce its position as a trusted partner in risk management.
The Company appreciates its shareholders, Board of Directors, management, staff, regulators, business partners, brokers, agents, customers and other stakeholders for their continued confidence and support throughout the recapitalization process.
Former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar, the African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential candidate for the 2027 election, has promised to implement the Supreme Court ruling granting financial autonomy to Nigeria’s 774 local government areas if he becomes president.
Atiku said his government would ensure that money meant for local governments from the Federation Account was paid directly to the councils instead of passing through state governments.
His position was contained in a statement issued on Tuesday by his spokesperson, Kenneth Okonkwo.
The Supreme Court ruled on July 11, 2024, that funds meant for local government councils should be paid directly to them. The decision followed a case brought by the Federal Government against the 36 state governors over the control and funding of local governments.
Recommended
However, some states have not fully implemented the judgment.
Atiku said he would ensure that the ruling was strictly followed and make local government autonomy a major part of his administration’s efforts to improve development at the grassroots.
“My administration will respect court judgments, protect local government autonomy, ensure that public funds reach the people for whom they are meant, and restore true federalism,” he said.
He said direct access to funds would give local governments more capacity to provide basic services and carry out development projects.
According to him, stronger local governments could also improve security at the grassroots by helping to tackle crime and terrorism while reducing poverty.
Atiku also accused President Bola Tinubu’s administration of failing to enforce the Supreme Court ruling.
He claimed that the government had avoided confronting some state governors over the issue because local government funds were allegedly being used as an enticement to secure their support for Tinubu’s 2027 re-election bid.
“Atiku acknowledges that the Supreme Court had ruled on July 2024 that local government funds should be paid directly to local governments,” the statement said.
“Yet, the current administration of President Tinubu has failed to enforce this judgment, seemingly to avoid confronting the gluttonous APC state governors who previously controlled these funds, as an enticement to them to use the local government funds to buy votes for Tinubu in the 2027 presidential election.”
Atiku said giving local governments control of their statutory allocations would improve accountability and ensure that money meant for grassroots development was used for its intended purpose.