Connect with us

News

Laid-off Oracle workers tried to negotiate better severance. Oracle said no. 

info

Published

on

GettyImages 528022874.jpg

As was widely reported, Oracle axed an estimated 20,000 to 30,000 people via email on March 31.

One of the employees cut that day told TechCrunch about the experience: “I had, like, this weird feeling in my stomach. I went to go sign into the VPN, and the VPN was like, ‘this user doesn’t exist anymore.’ Then I called my friend, and I was like, ‘Hey, can you see me in Slack?’ And she said, ‘No, your account’s been deactivated.’”

The person soon received an email stating their role was terminated immediately. The severance offer arrived a few days later. But Oracle’s terms would quickly become a point of contention — and some laid-off employees would push back.

Oracle offered fairly standard Corporate America terms to laid off employees. In exchange for signing a release waiving their right to sue, employees received four weeks of pay for the first year, plus one additional week per year of service, capped at 26 weeks. The company was also paying for one month of COBRA insurance.

The catch: Although stock compensation often makes up a good chunk of a tech worker’s pay, particularly at Oracle, the company did not accelerate soon-to-vest RSUs. Any shares that hadn’t vested by the termination date were forfeited.

That held true even for stock granted as retention incentives or in place of salary increases tied to promotions. One long-tenured employee lost $1 million in stock that was just four months from vesting; RSUs made up about 70% of his compensation, Time reported.

Some employees also discovered that if they were classified as remote workers by the company, and didn’t work in a state with stronger worker provisions like California or New York, the company said they didn’t qualify for WARN Act protections.

The WARN Act is a law that requires companies conducting mass layoffs to give employees two months notice prior to letting them go. It’s triggered when 50 or more people are impacted at one location. By classifying employees as remote workers, the minimum location requirements can be sidestepped.

Some people were unaware they were classified as remote workers, because they were near an office and worked on a hybrid schedule.

Even if they were covered by the WARN Act, this did not necessarily extend severance, the former Oracle employee said. That’s because Oracle included the two-months’ WARN notice pay in its existing calculation of four-weeks, plus one week per year.

For a short time, a group of employees tried to negotiate en masse with Oracle, according to a letter seen by TechCrunch. At least 90 people signed a public petition urging the database and cloud computing giant to match the terms of other big tech companies conducting mass layoffs in the name of AI.

For instance, Meta’s severance package, according to an email published by Business Insider, started at 16 weeks of base pay, plus two weeks for every year of employment and covered COBRA for 18 months.

Microsoft, which extended voluntary retirement offers to long-serving employees, provided accelerated stock vesting, a minimum of eight weeks’ pay, and an additional one to two weeks for every six months of service, depending on rank, the Seattle Times reported.

And Cloudflare, which just cut 20% of its employees, offered lump sum severance that was the equivalent of base pay through the end of 2026, plus healthcare coverage through the end of the year, and accelerated vesting of stock through August 15. So if an employee was close to obtaining another tranche, they will get it.

Oracle declined to negotiate, according to an email seen by TechCrunch. It was a take-it-or-leave scenario, the employee said.

When asked about its severance terms, classifying employees as remote, and the failed attempt by employees to negotiate more, Oracle declined to comment.

Such a reaction from the company isn’t a surprise, not even to those who hoped to negotiate. But it does underscore that for all the theoretical high pay (often via stocks) and perks that tech workers enjoy when it’s an employees’ market, they have very few protections in place when it isn’t.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

2027: APC plotting to hijack unclaimed PVCs – Makinde campaign council

info

Published

on

Makinde.jpg

The Makinde-Daura Presidential Campaign Organisation has accused the ruling All Progressive Congress, APC, of plotting to hijack unclaimed Permanent Voter Cards, PVCs, for the 2027 general elections.

The campaign council made this allegation in a statement on Thursday, stating that some officials of the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, were planning to release millions of unclaimed PVCs to APC-linked individuals ahead of the election.

It urged INEC to immediately address the allegation and tell Nigerians how uncollected voter cards are being protected across the country.

According to the council, the issue was too serious to be ignored, especially as political parties doubled their preparations for the 2027 general election.

Recommended

The council issued a strong warning, stressing that any compromise in the custody of unclaimed PVCs could create room for electoral manipulation and weaken public confidence in the outcome of the election.

“An unclaimed PVC must neither be a disposable property nor a political asset to the enemies of credible elections.

“Nigerians do not need post-election explanations; they deserve pre-election transparency,” the council said.

Continue Reading

News

Court Strikes Out Suit Challenging APC Reps Candidate In Ekiti

info

Published

on

Incollage 20260727 1247574932537149091929752519 1200x675.jpg

A Federal High Court sitting in Ado-Ekiti has struck out a suit seeking to nullify the nomination of Toyin Okoro as the All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate for Ekiti South Federal Constituency 1 in the 2027 House of Representatives election.

Justice Babs Kuewumi struck out the suit, marked FHC/AD/CS/19/2026, filed by Babalotin Bayo against Okoro and three others, on the grounds that the plaintiff lacked the legal standing to institute the action and that the court lacked jurisdiction to entertain it.

Bayo had approached the court seeking to invalidate the outcome of the APC primary election that produced Okoro as the party’s candidate for the federal constituency comprising Ikere, Ise-Orun and Ekiti South-West.

In his judgment, Justice Kuewumi described the plaintiff as a “meddlesome interloper” and a “busybody”, holding that he had no legal standing to challenge the conduct or outcome of the party’s primary.

The judge noted that Section 285 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, and relevant provisions of the Electoral Act confer the statutory right to challenge a party primary on an aspirant who participated in the primary.

Justice Kuewumi further ruled that the Ekiti State chapter of the APC does not have a separate legal personality that would allow it to be sued independently of the party’s national body.

Consequently, the judge struck out the name of the APC Ekiti State chapter from the suit.

Okoro, an indigene of Ise-Ekiti, emerged as the APC candidate after defeating the incumbent lawmaker, AVM Rufus Ojuawo (retd.), in the party’s May 2026 primary. His emergence was subsequently confirmed by the party’s National Working Committee (NWC).

Reacting to the judgment, Okoro’s lead counsel, Dr Femi Ogunlade, who appeared alongside Dr K.O. Francis, described the decision as a victory for the rule of law and internal party democracy.

Ogunlade said the judgment had reaffirmed that individuals could not assume constitutional rights that were not available to them.

“The court has come out clearly to re-affirm that no individual can confer constitutional rights upon themselves where none exists. The substratum of the plaintiff’s case was defective from the outset because he was never an aspirant in the primary election,” he said.

Also reacting, a lawyer and community leader from Ise-Ekiti, Adebayo Adeji, said the judgment had brought an end to the legal dispute surrounding Okoro’s candidacy.

Adeji said Okoro had strong support across the federal constituency, which comprises Ise-Orun, Ikere and Ekiti South-West Local Government Areas.

“The court has validated the choice of the people, and the decision shows that no individual can stand in the way of a moving political train,” he said.

The ruling leaves Okoro as the APC’s candidate for the constituency ahead of the 2027 elections.

Meanwhile, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has warned that political parties that field candidates whose names are not contained in the membership registers submitted to the commission will not be allowed to participate in the 2027 elections.

INEC National Commissioner in charge of Information and Voter Education, Mohammed Haruna, disclosed this while speaking on Trust TV’s Daily Politics programme on Wednesday evening.

File: Court Gavel
File: Court Gavel

Haruna said such parties would also not be allowed to substitute affected candidates, stressing that parties should not benefit from violations of the law.

“It’s like you committed an offence. And then, you come and benefit from it,” he said, citing previous cases involving Zamfara and Plateau states.

According to him, INEC was expected to make a definite pronouncement on the Supreme Court’s September 24, 2026 judgment by Tuesday next week, after obtaining legal advice on the Certified True Copy (CTC) of the judgment.

Haruna said the commission had to exercise caution because forged copies of court judgments had been presented in the past.

He added that the implication of the decision could extend to governorship and legislative candidates, saying some political parties might be unable to field candidates if they failed to meet the legal requirements.

“All the candidates, all the way to the houses of assembly, we interviewed them. If their names are not on the party register, they were not members of the party at the time that they contested for those tickets,” he said.

Haruna also expressed concern over the use of threats during political campaigns, saying such conduct should worry political parties and Nigerians generally.

“Those kinds of things, even if it’s a minority, it’s a cause for concern, because nobody should be threatened at all,” he said.

Continue Reading

Trending