Connect with us

Business

Full List: FG Bars Import of Poultry, Medicines, Cement from Non-ECOWAS Nations

info

Published

on

IMG 1953.jpeg

BY GABRIEL MICHEAL—The Federal Government has prohibited the entry of poultry-related items, cement, medicines, and agricultural goods originating from countries outside the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS).

In a directive released by the Federal Ministry of Finance and endorsed by the Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Wale Edun, authorities listed 17 categories of products now restricted from being brought in through the nation’s ports. The move is expected to significantly affect importers, freight handlers, and end users.

A key aspect of the directive is the broad limitation placed on pharmaceutical imports. The updated Trade Import Ban list applies specifically to selected goods coming from non-ECOWAS nations.

The directive also introduces an Import Adjustment Levy affecting 192 tariff classifications, with a plan for gradual removal in line with Nigeria’s obligations under the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA).

According to the statement, beginning January 2027, these levies—except those on items under the AfCFTA’s 3 per cent category—will be reduced yearly until they are completely eliminated by 2036.

Additionally, the government confirmed that excise charges, including an environmental surcharge, will take effect from July 1, 2026, with a 90-day window provided for compliance.

The restricted items include:

  1. Poultry, whether alive or processed, including frozen varieties
  2. Pork and beef products, including parts such as liver, tongue, and shoulder
  3. Eggs, except those intended for breeding and research
  4. Processed vegetable oils, excluding certain types like linseed, castor, olive oil, and crude oils
  5. Sugar derived from cane or beet, including flavored or colored forms
  6. Cocoa-based products such as butter, powder, and cakes
  7. Tomatoes in all forms, including paste and concentrates
  8. Sweetened or flavored water and other non-alcoholic drinks
  9. Cement packaged in bags
  10. Various categories of medicines
  11. Discarded pharmaceutical products
  12. Fertilisers containing nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium (NPK)
  13. Cleaning products such as soaps and detergents
  14. Corrugated paper materials including cartons and boxes
  15. Glass containers exceeding 0.15 litres in capacity
  16. Coated or plated iron and steel sheets measuring 600mm or more in width
  17. Ballpoint pens and their components, including ink refills (excluding tips)

The post Full List: FG Bars Import of Poultry, Medicines, Cement from Non-ECOWAS Nations appeared first on Business Today NG.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Transcorp, AXA Mansard, GTCO top stock pick this week

info

Published

on

By

Floor of the Nigerian Stock Exchange.png

MTN ADVERT

Nigerian stocks slid by 1.6 per cent last week, following profit-taking activities across all sectors except oil & gas.

The Insurance Index was worst hit, declining by 5.5 per cent, and remains the only sector index so far this year with a negative yield.

“Stocks with strong earnings, attractive valuations and consistent dividend payouts should also remain in focus,” investment bank United Capital Plc said in a note to investors ahead of the week.

This week, focus will shift to the primary market, where the landmark $1.6 billion initial public offering of Dangote Refinery will be commencing.

PREMIUM TIMES has assembled some stocks with sound fundamentals, adopting rigorous approaches to save you the risk of picking equities at random for investment.

PT WHATSAPP CHANNEL

The pick, a product of an analytical market watch, offers a guide to entering the market and taking strategic positions, with the expectation that selected stocks will record reasonable price appreciation with the passage of time.

This is not a buy, sell or hold recommendation but a stock investment guide. You may need to involve your financial advisor before taking investment decisions.

Transnational Corporation (Transcorp)

Transcorp tops this week’s list for its strong fundamentals and for trading below its intrinsic value. The net profit ratio (NPR) of the conglomerate is 24.7, while the price-to-earnings (PE) ratio is 4.5x. Its 10-day relative strength index (RSI) is 31.5.

AXA Mansard

AXA Mansard appears on the pick on the basis of its attractive fundamentals. The NPR of the insurer is 3.4, while the PE ratio is 29.8x, while the RSI is 47.3.

Guaranty Trust Holding Company (GTCO)

GTCO makes the selection for its strong fundamentals and for trading below its intrinsic value. The banking group’s NPR is 37.4, while the PE ratio is 5.4x. Its RSI is 47.8.

ALSO READ: Stanbic IBTC, Mutual Benefits, Aradel top stock picks this week

NPF Microfinance Bank

NPF Microfinance Bank makes the cut for its sound fundamentals. The PE ratio of the micro-lender is 7.2x, while the RSI is 22.5.

Neimeth

Neimeth makes the cut for its sound fundamentals. The NPR of the pharmaceutical company is 12.2, while the PE ratio is 33.2x. The RSI is 40.8.


Discover more from Premium Times Nigeria

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Business

CPPE warns against return to petrol subsidy, proposes targeted relief

info

Published

on

By

468939862 570688608903404 8583644854384931658 n.jpg

MTN ADVERT

The Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise (CPPE) has cautioned against restoring the petrol subsidy, describing the policy as fiscally unsustainable despite the severe economic pressures caused by rising petrol prices.

The private-sector advocacy group, in a policy brief signed by its Chief Executive Officer, Muda Yusuf, on Sunday, said the recent escalation in petrol prices had increased transportation, logistics and production costs, weakening consumers’ purchasing power.

It added that the recent increase in fuel prices also worsened the competitiveness challenges confronting businesses, particularly micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs).

CPPE’s position comes amid renewed calls for a return to fuel subsidy, including a pledge by former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar to restore a targeted petrol subsidy if elected in 2027.

The organisation said the subsidy debate should not be reduced to the issue of pump prices, arguing that it has wider implications for Nigeria’s fiscal sustainability, foreign exchange stability, investment, domestic refining, industrialisation, employment and energy security.

PT WHATSAPP CHANNEL

“The central policy question is therefore not whether Nigeria should return to the old subsidy regime, but how to preserve the gains of the reform while reducing its social costs and translating the resulting fiscal space into tangible improvements in citizens’ welfare,” CPPE said.

Subsidy regime

According to the think tank, Nigeria previously spent an estimated $10 billion to $15 billion annually on petroleum-product imports before the subsidy reform.

It said subsidy and under-recovery obligations also consumed significant public resources, constrained remittances to the Federation Account and intensified fiscal pressures.

CPPE said artificially low domestic petrol prices also encouraged arbitrage and cross-border diversion, effectively resulting in Nigerian public resources subsidising fuel consumption outside the country.

“The old regime was therefore not merely a subsidy problem; it was a major fiscal, foreign-exchange and resource-allocation problem,” the think tank said.

Domestic refining

The group said the shift to market-based petrol pricing had improved the commercial viability of domestic refining by creating stronger investment incentives in the sector.

The think tank argued that a competitive domestic refining industry would generate opportunities beyond petrol production, including in diesel, aviation fuel, petrochemicals, fertiliser, plastics, chemicals, logistics, storage and maritime services.

“Domestic refining also conserves foreign exchange through import substitution, creates export opportunities and retains refining, engineering, logistics and technical jobs within the Nigerian economy,” CPPE said.

It urged Nigeria to pursue the transition from dependence on imported petroleum products to becoming “a competitive regional refining and petrochemical hub.”

CPPE acknowledged that subsidy removal had increased revenues available to the federal, state and local governments but said higher government revenues alone could not justify the reform.

“Citizens must see tangible benefits through improved public transportation, electricity, healthcare, education, food security, infrastructure and social protection,” it said.

The organisation said the debate should now focus increasingly on fiscal accountability and the quality of government spending.

It called on the three tiers of government to transparently demonstrate how the additional resources arising from the reform were being used to improve economic and social outcomes.

Global oil shock

The group also stressed the need to distinguish the price increase associated with subsidy removal from more recent increases attributed to movements in global crude oil and refined-product prices.

According to CPPE, petrol was selling at about N774 to N800 per litre before the latest escalation in international energy prices, while prices subsequently rose above N1,300 per litre amid what it described as a sharp increase in global energy prices linked to the Middle East crisis.

“It would therefore be incorrect to attribute the entirety of the latest petrol-price increase to subsidy removal,” the organisation said.

The think tank described the two developments as separate issues requiring different policy responses: the first, a domestic structural reform involving the transition to market-based pricing, and the second, an external commodity price shock.

N20 trillion subsidy bill

CPPE said restoring a universal petrol subsidy could recreate the fiscal and foreign-exchange pressures that prompted the reform.

Using an estimated petrol consumption benchmark of 50 million litres per day and an indicative subsidy requirement of N1,050 per litre, the organisation estimated that the potential subsidy exposure could amount to about ₦ 152.5 billion daily, N1.575 trillion monthly, and approximately N19.16 trillion annually.

It described the figure as an annual burden of about N20 trillion, while acknowledging that the actual cost would depend on factors including consumption, crude oil prices, exchange rates, refining or landing costs, and the regulated pump price.

CPPE also warned that consumption could increase under a subsidy regime as price differentials could recreate incentives for cross-border diversion.

“An annual subsidy bill approaching N20 trillion would impose an enormous opportunity cost,” it said.

According to the organisation, such spending could compete with funding for infrastructure, education, healthcare, security, agriculture and social protection, while potentially widening the fiscal deficit and increasing borrowing and debt-service pressures.

It further warned that increased government borrowing could crowd out private-sector credit, sustain high interest rates and weaken investment, productivity, job creation and economic growth.

“Nigeria would therefore risk replacing an energy-price problem with a much larger fiscal, debt, foreign-exchange and investment problem,” CPPE said.

Targeted relief

Rather than restoring the the petrol subsidy, the organisation urged the government to implement targeted interventions to reduce household vulnerability and business costs.

It recommended expanding affordable public transportation, rail freight, and logistics infrastructure; improving electricity supply; accelerating compressed natural gas (CNG), solar, and distributed energy solutions; and strengthening food production through improved agricultural security, irrigation, rural infrastructure, and logistics.

CPPE also called for targeted support for vulnerable households, improved public healthcare and education, and measures to reduce energy, logistics and financing costs for productive enterprises, particularly MSMEs.

READ ALSO: CPPE urges NMDPRA to tie petrol imports to verified supply gaps

It urged the government to maintain a predictable, market-oriented framework for the downstream petroleum sector to protect investor confidence and encourage further investment in domestic refining.

“The appropriate policy direction is to preserve the downstream petroleum reforms while aggressively mitigating their social and economic costs,” the organisation said.

CPPE said the fiscal gains from subsidy removal must become more visible through infrastructure, public services and productive investment, alongside greater transparency and accountability in the utilisation of additional revenues accruing to the federal, state and local governments.

“The subsidy debate should therefore move beyond the binary question of whether petrol subsidy should be restored.

“The more consequential issue is how Nigeria can convert the gains of the reform into lower structural costs, stronger domestic production, improved competitiveness, greater energy security and measurable improvements in citizens’ welfare,” it said.

The organisation said the recommendations would make the reform “economically sustainable and socially defensible.”

Nigeria’s petrol subsidy was removed in May 2023 after President Bola Tinubu announced during his inauguration on 29 May that “the fuel subsidy is gone.”

The announcement effectively ended the government’s previous system of subsidising petrol costs, prompting the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC Ltd) to adjust pump prices nationwide in June 2023.

The reform was intended to reduce the government’s financial burden from subsidising petrol.


Discover more from Premium Times Nigeria

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Trending