Connect with us

News

Elon Musk’s only expert witness at the OpenAI trial fears an AGI arms race

info

Published

on

Stuart russell ai getty.jpg

When do we take AI doomers seriously?

That’s a key subtext of Elon Musk’s attempt to shut down OpenAI’s for-profit AI business. His attorneys argue that the organization was set up as a charity focused on AI safety, and lost its way in pursuit of lucre. To prove that, they cite old emails and statements from the organization’s founders about the need for a public-spirited counterweight to Google DeepMind.

Today, they called their only expert witness: Peter Russell, a University of California, Berkeley computer science professor who has studied AI for decades. His job was to offer background on AI, and establish that this technology is dangerous enough to worry about.

Russell co-signed an open letter in March 2023 calling for a six-month pause in AI research. In a sign of the contradictions here, Musk also signed the same letter, even as he was launching xAI, his own for-profit AI lab.

Russell told jurors and Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rodgers that there were a variety of risks associated with the development of AI, ranging from cybersecurity threats to problems with misalignment and the winner-take-all nature of developing Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Ultimately, he said that there was a tension between the pursuit of AGI and safety.

Russell’s larger concerns about the existential threats of unconstrained AI didn’t get aired in open court after objections from OpenAI’s attorneys led the judge to limit Russell’s testimony. But Russell has long been a critic of the arms-race dynamic created by frontier labs around the globe competing to reach AGI first, and called for governments to regulate the field more tightly.

OpenAI’s attorneys spent their cross-examination establishing that Russell wasn’t directly evaluating the organization’s corporate structure or its specific safety policies.

Techcrunch event

San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026

But this reporter (as well as the judge and the jurors) will be weighing how much value to put on the relationship between corporate greed and AI safety concerns. Virtually every one of the OpenAI founders have strenuously warned about the risks of AI, while also emphasizing the benefits, attempting to build AI as fast as possible — and hatching plans for AI-focused for-profit enterprises they would control.

From the outside, a clear issue here is the growing realization inside OpenAI after its founding that the organization simply needed more compute spend if it was to succeed. That money could only come from for-profit investors. The founding team’s fear of AGI in the hands of a single organization pushed them to seek the capital that ultimately tore the team apart, creating the arms race we know today—and bringing us to this lawsuit.

The same dynamic is already playing out at a national level: Senator Bernie Sanders’ push for a law imposing a moratorium on data center construction cites AI fears enunciated by Musk, Sam Altman, Geoffrey Hinton and others. Hoden Omar, who works at the trade organization the Center for Data Innovation, objected to Sanders citing their fears without their hopes, telling TechCrunch that “it is unclear why the public should discount everything tech billionaires say except when their words can be recruited to fill gaps in a precarious argument.”

Now, both sides of the case are asking the court to do just that: take part of Altman and Musk’s arguments seriously, but discount the parts that are less useful for their legal argument.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

NPFL 2025/2026: How Kun Khalifat FC Escaped Relegation With Second-Stanza Magic, Smart Recruitment

info

Published

on

By

WhatsApp Image 2026 05 25 at 3.10.10 PM.jpeg

In a league season where survival often depends on experience, money, and consistency, few stories capture the spirit of resilience better than the dramatic escape of Kun Khalifat FC in the 2025/2026 Nigeria Premier Football League campaign.

At one point in the season, relegation looked almost inevitable for the Owerri-based side. Results were poor, confidence was low, and many observers believed KKFC lacked the squad depth needed to survive the brutality of the NPFL.

Read Also: Nigeria Cricket Federation Appoints ‘ Stephen Maziva Mangongo as Head Coach, High-Performance Manager | Sports247 Nigeria

But football has a way of rewarding courage, smart planning, and bold decisions.

What followed in the second stanza of the season was nothing short of extraordinary.

The Turning Point That Changed Everything

The biggest gamble came during the mid-season transfer window when KKFC owner Micheal Ahamefula made a decision many supporters initially questioned.

Rather than hold on emotionally to key players, he sanctioned the sale of three important squad members to Barau FC:
Ebuka Nwokorie
Henry Ezeonye
Uche Moses

The transfer reportedly brought in about ₦15 million in sign-on fees.
For many struggling NPFL clubs, that money could easily disappear into operational expenses. But Ahamefula had a different vision.

Instead of panicking in the market for expensive stars, he returned to the football streets of Owerri , searching for hungry, overlooked, and ambitious talents desperate for an opportunity. That decision ultimately saved KKFC’s season.

The Street Recruitment Strategy That Worked

From local football circles and lesser-known setups emerged a new wave of players who transformed Kun Khalifat FC’s campaign:

Uchechukwu Onuoha
Chijoke Ejiogu
James Ekebuike
Ebuka James
Mmesoma Nnorom
What looked like low-profile recruitment soon became one of the smartest rebuilding projects of the NPFL season.

The new arrivals brought hunger, energy, fearlessness, and tactical balance to a side fighting for survival.

Uchechukwu Onuoha Became the Symbol of Survival

No player represented KKFC’s great escape more than striker Uchechukwu Onuoha.
Signed during the second half of the season, the forward exploded into form at exactly the right moment.

Onuoha scored eight goals in the second stanza alone, becoming the attacking spark that reignited KKFC’s survival hopes.

His movement, finishing, and ability to score under pressure gave the club belief during the most difficult weeks of the campaign.
Every survival story needs a hero.

For KKFC, that hero was Onuoha.

The Supporting Cast That Delivered Under Pressure

While Onuoha grabbed the headlines, survival was also built on collective effort.

James Ekebuike contributed crucial goals after joining mid-season, adding attacking depth and relieving pressure from the frontline. His four-goal contribution proved vital in tight fixtures.

Creative midfielder Mmesoma Nnorom provided key assists and attacking intelligence, helping KKFC become more dangerous in transition during the closing stages of the season.

At the back, veteran goalkeeper Chijoke Ejiogu brought leadership, composure, and experience. In several must-win encounters, his saves preserved valuable points that eventually kept the club afloat.

These were not superstar signings.
They were simply players who arrived with purpose.

The Five-Game Run That Saved Their NPFL Status

When the pressure became unbearable, KKFC produced their best football of the season.

The club went unbeaten in their final five matches, picking up an astonishing 13 points from a possible 15.
That remarkable run completely altered the relegation picture.

At a stage where every mistake could have sent them down, Kun Khalifat FC suddenly became one of the most difficult teams to beat in the league.

The confidence returned. The goals arrived. The belief spread through the squad.

And by the end of the campaign, the same club many had already written off completed one of the most impressive survival escapes of the NPFL season.

Micheal Ahamefula’s Midas Touch

Football survival is often discussed in tactical terms, but KKFC’s escape also became a lesson in football management and investment.

Micheal Ahamefula understood something many club owners fail to recognize — smart recruitment can outweigh expensive recruitment.

He sold assets at the right time, reinvested wisely, trusted grassroots scouting, and rebuilt a competitive squad without reckless spending.

That strategy changed the destiny of the club.
Now, the reward may extend beyond survival itself.

Bigger Clubs Are Already Circling

The performances of KKFC’s second-stanza recruits have reportedly attracted attention across the Nigerian football scene.

As many as nine Kun Khalifat FC players are now being monitored by bigger clubs ahead of the upcoming transfer window.

Ironically, the same survival battle that nearly destroyed the club could soon become a financial breakthrough.

If KKFC successfully cash in on these emerging talents, owner Micheal Ahamefula may once again smile to the bank — proving that proper football investment is not always about spending more, but spending wisely.

More Than Survival

Kun Khalifat FC’s 2025/2026 campaign will not simply be remembered as a relegation escape story.

It was a season that demonstrated the power of scouting, courage, calculated risks, and belief in grassroots talent.

While bigger clubs chased expensive solutions, KKFC went back to the streets of Owerri and found players hungry enough to save a football club.
In the end, that hunger became their greatest weapon.

Continue Reading

Business

NITDA debunks association with online earning platform demanding payment

info

Published

on

By

NITDA logo.jpg

The National Information Technology Development Agency has denied any affiliation with an online earning and marketing platform known as CPM. This rebuttal follows reports that the platform was demanding money from users to repair its allegedly hacked systems.

The agency issued the disclaimer in a statement signed by its Director, Corporate Communications and Media Relations Department, Hadiza Umar, on Monday, describing the reports as false and misleading.

According to media reports, subscribers via the platform operators reported that their systems had been hacked and that additional payments were required from subscribers to resolve the issue and recover funds.

NITDA allegedly was helping them to resolve the issue and that subscribers needed to make additional payments to support the process.

NITDA debunked those reports dissociating itself from CPM, noting that the agency, as a government agency, did not request money.

PT WHATSAPP CHANNEL

“NITDA wishes to categorically state that these claims are false and misleading.

“As a government agency and Nigeria’s Information Technology regulator, NITDA does not request or collect money from citizens to provide incident response support, recover funds, or assist private entities in resolving cybersecurity incidents,” NITDA said.

The agency alleged that the efforts of the so-called CPM to disguise itself as NITDA indicated possible social engineering and fraudulent activity. It said the efforts targeted exploiting affected individuals under the pretence of resolving a cybersecurity incident or recovering lost investments.

NITDA warned Nigerians against making financial payments to any bodies or organisations that claim NITDA requires such payments for operations.

“Members of the public are therefore strongly advised to exercise caution and avoid making any additional payments to any individual, group, or platform claiming that such payments are required by or connected to NITDA.

READ ALSO: NITDA, IDCA partner to transform Nigeria’s digital economy

“The reported pattern may indicate possible social engineering or fraudulent activity aimed at exploiting affected individuals under the guise of resolving a cybersecurity incident or recovering lost investments,” the agency said.

NITDA said Nigeria should exercise caution when dealing with online investment and trading platforms and must avoid sending additional funds in an attempt to recover previous investments or losses.

The agency added that online users must verify any claims of government involvement directly through official channels and refrain from sharing sensitive personal or financial information with unverified entities.

The regulator reiterated that Nigerians must promptly report suspicious cyber-related activities to the appropriate authorities to contain increasing risks of online attacks and fraud.

“NITDA remains committed to promoting cybersecurity awareness and protecting the public against cyber-enabled fraud and deceptive online activities.”


Continue Reading

Trending