Connect with us

News

The Stanford freshmen who want to rule the world . . . will probably read this book and try even harder

info

Published

on

Screenshot 2025 12 11 at 4.37.19 PM.png

Theo Baker is graduating from Stanford this spring with something most seniors don’t have: a book deal, a George Polk Award that he received for his investigative reporting as a student journalist, and a front-row account of one of the most romanticized institutions in the world.

His forthcoming How to Rule the World: An Education in Power at Stanford University was excerpted Friday in The Atlantic and based on that alone, I can’t wait to see the rest. The only question worth asking is the same one Baker himself might be too close to answer, which is: Can a book like this actually change anything? Or does the spotlight, as it always seems to, send more students racing to the place?

The parallel that keeps coming to my mind is “The Social Network.” Aaron Sorkin wrote a film that was an indictment in many ways of the particular sociopathy that Silicon Valley tends to reward. What it seemingly did was make a generation of young people want to be Mark Zuckerberg. The cautionary tale became a recruitment video. The story of the guy who — in the movie, at least — steamrolled his best friend on his way to billions didn’t discourage ambition; it further glamorized it.

Judging by the excerpt, Baker’s portrait of Stanford is far more granular. He talks with hundreds of people to roundly describe the “Stanford inside Stanford.” “You sort of join it freshman year or you don’t,” one student tells Baker. It’s an invite-only world where venture capitalists wine and dine 18-year-olds, where “pre-idea funding” worth hundreds of thousands of dollars gets handed to students before they’ve had an original idea, and where the boundary between mentorship and predation is nearly impossible to discern. (The shame of chasing teenage founders, if it ever existed, is gone; not chasing them is no longer an option for most VCs.) Steve Blank, who teaches the school’s legendary startup course, tells Baker that “Stanford is an incubator with dorms,” which is not meant as a compliment.

What’s new isn’t that this pressure exists but that it has been fully internalized. There was a time, maybe 10, maybe 15 years ago, when Stanford students felt the weight of Silicon Valley expectation pressing down on them from outside. Now, many of them arrive on campus already expecting, as a matter of course, to launch a startup, to raise money, to become rich.

I think about a friend — I’ll call him D — who dropped out of Stanford a few years ago, partway through his first two years, to launch a startup. He was barely past his teens. The words “I’m thinking of take a leave of absence” had just escaped his mouth before the university, by his own account, gave him its cheerful blessing to dive full bore into the startup. Stanford doesn’t fight this anymore, if it ever did. Departures like his are an expected outcome.

D is now in his mid-twenties. His company has raised what would register in any normal context as an astonishing amount of money. He almost certainly knows more about cap tables, venture dynamics, and product-market fit than most people learn in a decade of conventional careers. By every metric the Valley uses, he’s a success story. But he also doesn’t see his family (no time), has barely dated (no time), and the company, which keeps growing, doesn’t seem inclined to provide him with that kind of balance anytime soon. He is already, in some meaningful sense, behind on his own life.

Techcrunch event

San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026

This is the part that Baker’s excerpt hints at without fully landing on, maybe because he’s still inside it himself. The costs of this system aren’t just distributed in the form of fraud — though Baker is direct about this, describing it as pervasive and largely consequence-free. The costs are also more personal: the relationships not formed, the ordinary milestones of early adulthood traded away in exchange for a billion-dollar vision that, statistically, almost certainly won’t materialize. “100% of entrepreneurs think they’re visionaries,” Blank tells Baker. “The data say 99% aren’t.”

What happens to the 99% at age 30? At age 40? These aren’t questions Silicon Valley is set up to answer, and they’re certainly not questions Stanford is about to start asking.

Baker also surfaces something that Sam Altman articulates best. Altman — OpenAI CEO, former Y Combinator head, precisely the kind of person these students aspire to become — tells Baker that the VC dinner circuit has become an “anti-signal” to the people who actually know what talent looks like. The students doing the rounds, performing founder-ness for rooms full of investors, tend not to be the real builders. The real builders, presumably, are somewhere else, building things. The performance of ambition and the thing itself are increasingly hard to tell apart, and the system that was ostensibly designed to find genius has gotten very good at finding people who are good at seeming like geniuses.

How to Rule the World sounds like exactly the right book for this moment in time. But there’s a certain irony in the strong likelihood that this critically minded book about Stanford’s relationship to power and money will be celebrated by the same class of people it critiques, and — if it does well (it has already been optioned for a movie) — used as further evidence that Stanford produces not just founders and fraudsters but important writers and journalists, too.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Ex-APC Spokesman Urges Tinubu to Quit 2027 Race After Mosque Protest

info

Published

on

20261030 095454 1200x675.jpg

Former Deputy National Publicity Secretary of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Timi Frank, has called on President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to withdraw from the 2027 presidential election following the protest that greeted him at a mosque in Abuja.

Frank said the incident at the Shehu Shagari Central Mosque in Area 1, Garki, Abuja, should serve as a warning to the President about the level of dissatisfaction among some Nigerians over his administration.

He urged Tinubu to reconsider his second-term ambition rather than proceed with the election despite what he described as growing public opposition to his government.

The former APC chieftain also advised the President to ensure that the 2027 general election is free, fair and credible, insisting that Nigerians should be allowed to determine who leads the country through their votes.

Frank made the remarks following an incident on Friday, November 13, when some worshippers and youths reportedly expressed their displeasure with Tinubu shortly after he observed Juma’at prayers at the mosque.

Videos from the incident showed some individuals booing the President and chanting “Ba ma yi”, a Hausa expression meaning “we don’t want you”, as his convoy prepared to leave the premises.

Crowd Shouts 'Bamayi' at Tinubu, Throws Stones at His Convoy in Abuja
Crowd Shouts ‘Bamayi’ at Tinubu, Throws Stones at His Convoy in Abuja

The protest attracted attention after footage circulated on social media.

There were also reports of individuals removing and destroying campaign posters and billboards bearing Tinubu’s image in parts of the Area 1 neighbourhood.

Nonetheless, while condemning the decision to express political grievances during a religious gathering, Frank acknowledged the efforts of the President’s security team in protecting him and preventing the situation from escalating.

However, he maintained that the reaction from some worshippers should not be ignored or dismissed as an isolated incident.

According to him, the President needs to understand the political situation in the country and pay attention to the feelings of ordinary Nigerians rather than depend entirely on assurances from political associates.

“The rejection was total and unmistakable. No Nigerian president has been embarrassed like this publicly. The way Nigerians rejected him speaks volumes. But should he decide to go ahead and he loses, he should be prepared to accept defeat just like former President Goodluck Jonathan did,” Frank said.

He further questioned the level of support Tinubu reportedly enjoys in the Federal Capital Territory, arguing that the incident at the mosque raised questions about claims made by some political figures concerning the President’s popularity in Abuja.

Frank suggested that there was a difference between the assurances political associates gave Tinubu and the political realities outside government circles.

He warned that some individuals around the President might be giving him an inaccurate picture of public opinion because of their personal interests.

“I am giving him this advice because I genuinely want him to listen to the truth. Those around him may not be telling him that he has become very unpopular and that continuing in the presidential race may be a difficult undertaking,” he said.

The former APC spokesman maintained that Tinubu should seriously consider stepping aside from the 2027 contest instead of allowing political pressure from his associates to determine his decision.

Frank also questioned the confidence expressed by some political leaders about their ability to deliver substantial votes for the President in the next election.

Nyesom Wike
Nyesom Wike

He specifically mentioned FCT Minister Nyesom Wike and Edo State Governor Monday Okpebholo, questioning whether the electoral figures reportedly promised by political allies would reflect the actual choices of voters.

He argued that promises to secure 80 per cent of the votes in Abuja and 2.5 million votes in Edo State should not be taken as a guarantee of electoral victory.

According to him, political leaders should understand that making promises on behalf of voters is different from securing their support at the polling units.

Frank also referred to reactions witnessed in Abuja and Jos following political activities involving the ruling party.

He argued that such developments should encourage Tinubu to reassess the level of support his administration commands.

He further alleged that some individuals within the APC and the President’s political circle were more concerned about personal financial benefits than providing honest assessments of the government’s performance.

The former party official also brought opposition figures, including former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar and former Anambra State Governor Peter Obi, into the discussion.

He claimed that the reception given to the opposition leaders during their public appearances showed that Nigerians were increasingly interested in alternative political options ahead of the next general election.

Frank argued that the crowds received by the opposition figures were an indication that political support could not always be measured through organised rallies and the number of people mobilised by political parties.

“Wherever these opposition leaders go, Nigerians come out in large numbers to receive them without being induced with rice or money. Their reception should tell the President something about the mood of the country,” he said.

He maintained that the Tinubu administration should take public reactions seriously, particularly as political activities ahead of the 2027 elections continue to gather momentum.

Frank also linked the dissatisfaction he alleged to the economic difficulties confronting Nigerians.

He mentioned rising food prices, hunger, unemployment, insecurity and the increasing cost of living as some of the challenges affecting households across the country.

According to him, the difficulties experienced by ordinary citizens have contributed to the criticism directed at the Federal Government.

He argued that the administration needed to pay greater attention to the economic situation and the concerns of Nigerians instead of relying on political endorsements as evidence of public acceptance.

“If the President had performed well, there would be no need for the desperation we are witnessing today,” he said.

Frank also questioned the sincerity of some political endorsements received by Tinubu, alleging that certain expressions of support were driven by expectations of financial rewards and personal benefits.

He urged the President to identify those genuinely interested in the country’s progress and distinguish them from individuals whose political positions were influenced by their personal interests.

File: Election in Nigeria
File: Election in Nigeria

Beyond his criticism of the administration, Frank warned against any attempt to manipulate the 2027 general election or undermine the wishes of voters.

He insisted that the credibility of the election would be more important than the political ambitions of any individual or party.

“Nigerians will not accept a situation in which someone is declared the winner when the people know they did not vote for him. They should not push the country into a crisis by attempting to impose him on the people,” he warned.

He called on Tinubu to respect the democratic process and ensure that the electoral authorities are allowed to conduct an election in which every vote counts.

The former APC spokesman further argued that the President could still secure a positive place in Nigeria’s political history if he chose to put the country’s democratic interests above his personal ambition.

“President Tinubu still has an opportunity to make history and have his name written in gold. He can achieve this by ensuring that the country conducts a free, fair and credible election,” he said.

Frank maintained that a transparent electoral process would allow Nigerians to freely choose their preferred candidate without intimidation, manipulation or interference.

He also stressed that the next presidential election should not become a source of political instability, warning that attempts to impose a candidate against the wishes of voters could generate serious consequences for the country.

Continue Reading

News

2027: Don't let politicians divide you – Obasanjo warns Nigerian youths in Kano

info

Published

on

Obasanjo

Former President Olusegun Obasanjo has told Nigerian youths not to allow politicians to use them to cause division in the country.

Obasanjo gave the advice on Saturday shortly after he was honoured with an honorary doctorate degree by Skyline University of Nigeria in Kano.

Speaking through a recorded video message, the former president said young people must refuse any campaign built on hate, segregation, discrimination and marginalisation, no matter who is behind it.

He said youths should not sit down and wait for change, but must fight for the kind of future they want for themselves.

According to him, young Nigerians must be positively disruptive, and must be ready to shake the system in a good way to bring real development.

Obasanjo reminded them that Nigeria was built by young leaders in the past, and he mentioned the likes of Aminu Kano and Anthony Enahoro, who stood up early to serve the country.

He said age, tribe or religion should not stop any youth from making impact, adding that the future of Nigeria is in the hands of the young generation.

"Don't let politicians divide you. You must reject campaigns capable of promoting division, segregation, discrimination and marginalisation, regardless of their ethnic, religious or age differences," he said.

The former president received the honour alongside former Executive Secretary of the National Universities Commission, Prof. Abubakar Adamu-Rasheed, and Mrs. Vadana Luthra.

2027: Don’t let politicians divide you – Obasanjo warns Nigerian youths in Kano

Continue Reading

Trending