The Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) has introduced a new regulatory requirement mandating prior approval for any ownership change involving 10% or more of the shareholding of telecommunications companies, in a move aimed at strengthening industry oversight and preventing anti-competitive practices.
Under the new directive, any proposed transfer of ownership or control of shares amounting to 10% or more of the total share capital of a company licensed by the telecoms regulator, NCC, must obtain a Letter of No Objection from the commission before the transaction can be registered by the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC).
The requirement, jointly announced by the NCC and the CAC, takes immediate effect and applies not only to single transactions exceeding the 10% threshold but also to multiple share transfers that cumulatively exceed 10% of a licensee’s total share capital.
According to the two agencies, the measure is backed by Section 90 of the Nigerian Communications Act (NCA) 2003, Regulation 28(2) of the Competition Practices Regulations 2007, and Regulation 42 of the Licensing Regulations 2019, all of which empower the NCC to review transactions affecting its licensees and promote fair competition within the communications sector.
The NCC now requires prior approval for telecoms share transfers involving 10% or more ownership, strengthening oversight and competition rules. Image credit: Technology Times.
The requirement, jointly announced by the NCC and the CAC, takes immediate effect and applies not only to single transactions exceeding the 10% threshold but also to multiple share transfers that cumulatively exceed 10% of a licensee’s total share capital.
Telecoms share transfers over 10% now need NCC approval
The NCC and CAC say the new framework is designed to ensure that significant ownership changes in telecom companies do not undermine competition, market stability or regulatory oversight.
“Effective immediately any proposed transfer of ownership or control of shares in a licensee of the Nigerian Communications Commission, amounting to ten percent (10%) or more of the total share capital, as well as any series of share transfers which in aggregate exceed ten percent (10%) of the total share capital of the Licensee shall require a Letter of No Objection from NCC in order for the changes to be effected and registered with the CAC,” the agencies said.
As part of the arrangement, the CAC will verify that any request submitted by a telecommunications company for the registration of ownership changes involving 10% or more of its shareholding is accompanied by evidence of the NCC’s prior approval.
The agencies said the requirement is intended to close potential regulatory gaps that could permit substantial changes in the ownership and control of telecommunications companies without the knowledge or review of the sector regulator.
According to the two agencies, the measure will help preserve a fair and competitive market structure by preventing both direct and indirect anti-competitive practices.
Why the 10% telecoms threshold matters
Ownership structures remain a critical aspect of telecommunications regulation because substantial share acquisitions can influence strategic decisions, board composition, corporate governance and, in some cases, control of critical communications infrastructure.
By formally setting a 10% approval threshold, the NCC is effectively increasing its visibility over significant changes in the ownership and control of licensed operators before such transactions receive legal recognition.
Nigeria’s telecommunications sector remains one of the country’s most strategic industries, serving millions of subscribers while supporting digital services, fintech platforms, government operations and business communications.
As of April 2026, the Nigeria telecommunications market accounted for over 188 million active phone lines with teledensity, the number of active telephone connections per 100 inhabitants living within an area rising to 86.73%.
The nation’s active internet connections also peaked at 154.7 million, with broadband accounting for over 120.6 million, representing 55.67% of the data service within the period, according to NCC statistics.
The latest directive builds on existing provisions of the Nigerian Communications Act and the NCC’s competition regulations, which have long empowered the regulator to scrutinise transactions involving licensed operators, the telecoms regulator says.
Dr. Aminu Maida, Executive Vice Chairman/CEO, NCC. Image credit: NCC.
“The requirement,” the agencies stated, “is designed to preserve a fair and competitive market structure within the communications sector by preventing direct or indirect anti-competitive practices, while strengthening regulatory oversight of significant changes in ownership and control. It will further promote transparency, investor confidence and regulatory certainty and safeguard the long-term sustainability and stability of the industry.”
New framework links regulatory approval to corporate registration
The Commission has previously exercised such powers in major industry transactions. One of the most notable examples was MTN Nigeria’s acquisition of Visafone in 2016, when the NCC approved the transfer of Visafone’s shareholding to MTN while clarifying that the approval related to the ownership transaction, and not the transfer of the telecoms licence itself.
The NCC’s Competition Practices Regulations 2007 and subsequent licensing regulations have also provided mechanisms for reviewing transactions that could affect competition, market concentration or control of communications licensees.
However, the latest arrangement marks a significant enforcement milestone by creating a direct link between regulatory approval and corporate registration.
Under the new framework, the Corporate Affairs Commission will not register ownership changes involving 10% or more of a telecom licensee’s shareholding unless evidence of the NCC’s prior approval is presented.
The measure effectively gives the telecoms regulator greater oversight of significant ownership changes before they are legally recognised.
Over the years, the NCC has exercised its powers to review mergers, acquisitions and other transactions involving licensed operators to ensure that market concentration does not harm competition or consumer interests.
The latest directive expands that oversight by establishing a formal approval threshold tied specifically to ownership changes and requiring closer coordination between the communications regulator and the country’s corporate registry.
NCC, CAC say new telecoms rule will boost transparency, investor confidence
The NCC and CAC said the new requirement would also improve investor confidence by providing greater regulatory certainty around transactions involving licensed telecom operators.
“The requirement,” the agencies stated, “is designed to preserve a fair and competitive market structure within the communications sector by preventing direct or indirect anti-competitive practices, while strengthening regulatory oversight of significant changes in ownership and control. It will further promote transparency, investor confidence and regulatory certainty and safeguard the long-term sustainability and stability of the industry.”
Reaffirming their commitment to industry development, both agencies said they would continue to work closely to advance a transparent, stable and competitive business environment for the communications sector.
“The NCC and the CAC reaffirm their shared commitment to advancing a transparent, stable, and competitive business environment in Nigeria. Both agencies will continue to work closely to promote regulatory certainty, ensure fair market practices, and support the orderly and sustainable development of Nigeria’s Communications Sector.”
Stay ahead with real-time reports, breaking news, and exclusive insights delivered directly to your phone. Don’t settle for outdated information. Join TECHNOLOGYTIMES NEWS on WhatsApp for 24/7 updates.
A social commentator, Dogo Nanzing, has weighed in on the ongoing debate over indigeneity in Jos North Local Government Area, cautioning against what he described as attempts to alter Plateau State’s historical narrative following a recent High Court judgment on the issuance of indigene certificates.
Nanzing made his position known in a video posted on his social media platform and monitored by Jos Events, where he expressed concern over the controversies generated by the court ruling involving Fatima Baba Akawu and the Jos North Local Government Council.
The debate stems from a judgment delivered by Justice C. Donglong of the Plateau State High Court, which held that Fatima Baba Akawu, a Hausa woman born and raised in Jos North to a father recognized as an indigene of the area, is entitled to be issued a Certificate of Indigene by the local government.
Reacting to the ruling, Nanzing described the situation as an “existential battle” for Plateau people, alleging that some individuals were attempting to rewrite the historical realities of Jos North.
“Plateau in recent times has been going through what I call an existential battle. Certain people are desperately trying to rewrite our history and create narratives that are not true, especially as it relates to Jos North,” he said.
While emphasizing that his comments were not intended to promote ethnic division, Nanzing maintained that discussions surrounding land ownership, identity, and indigeneity must be grounded in truth and historical accuracy.
“This is not meant to cause division. I have many Hausa friends whom I respect, but when it comes to the issue of the land, I will always stand for the land,” he stated.
The commentator commended former Plateau State Governor, Senator Jonah Jang, for what he described as his consistent advocacy on matters affecting the identity and interests of Plateau communities.
He also praised the Plateau Indigenous Development Association Network (PIDAN) for swiftly responding to the judgment and pursuing legal steps to challenge the ruling through the appellate process.
According to Nanzing, historical records and reports from previous commissions of inquiry should serve as the basis for public understanding of indigeneity issues rather than emotional arguments or politically motivated narratives.
He argued that claims suggesting Jos North originally belonged to Hausa/Fulani communities are inconsistent with available historical accounts, insisting that the indigenous ethnic groups of the area remain the Berom, Afizere, and Anaguta peoples.
“If anyone says Jos North originally belonged to Hausa/Fulani, then they should explain at what point in history the Berom, Afizere and Anaguta people took the land from them. History must be based on facts,” he said.
Nanzing further dismissed speculation linking the judgment to any political arrangement, insisting that there was no evidence connecting Governor Caleb Mutfwang to such allegations.
He called for renewed efforts to document, preserve, and teach Plateau history in schools, warning that future generations risk losing touch with their heritage if historical facts are not properly safeguarded.
Meanwhile, PIDAN has formally appealed the High Court judgment, arguing that the case raises broader constitutional and legal questions concerning indigeneity, ancestry, citizenship, and the rights of indigenous communities in Plateau State.
The association maintained that while every Nigerian has the constitutional right to reside and engage in lawful activities anywhere in the country, the determination of indigene status should continue to be guided by established historical, constitutional, and legal principles.
As the controversy continues to generate debate across Plateau State, stakeholders are closely monitoring the appellate proceedings, which are expected to further shape discussions on identity, citizenship, and belonging in Jos North and beyond.
Director of News and Political Editor at Arise Television, Sumner Sambo, says the opposition political parties need to show capacity ahead of the 2027 general elections.
Sambo made this statement on Monday when he appeared as a guest in an interview on Arise Television’s ‘Morning Show’.
He was speaking on the recently concluded Ekiti State governorship election, where the incumbent governor, Abiodun Oyebanji, was declared the winner by the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC.
According to him, the elections have shown that opposition political parties have to put in the work, stressing that they need to show capacity.
“Judging from the political angle of the election in Ekiti, the opposition didn’t give a very good performance.
“We need to question the facts coming out of the election. What exactly was the opposition doing to the extent that results coming out do not reflect what happened in the 2018 and 2022 elections, which were very much intense,” he asked.