Connect with us

Business

Naira depreciation, not fresh borrowing, drove debt surge — Oyedele

info

Published

on

Admin ajax 3 2.jpg

MTN ADVERT

The Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Taiwo Oyedele, has said much of the increase in Nigeria’s public debt since the current administration assumed office resulted from exchange-rate depreciation and accounting adjustments rather than extensive new borrowing.

Mr Oyedele spoke on Monday while briefing the Senate Committee on Finance on the state of the economy, in response to concerns by lawmakers over the country’s rising debt profile.

His remarks followed questions from Senator Adamu Aliero (Kebbi Central), who referred to claims that the President Bola Tinubu administration had borrowed about ₦80 trillion in addition to the approximately ₦75 trillion public debt it inherited.

Responding, the minister cautioned against comparing the country’s debt stock at the beginning of the administration to the current figure without accounting for the impact of naira depreciation.

“When this administration came into office, public debt was around ₦75 trillion. Many people simply compare that figure with today’s debt stock and conclude that this government has borrowed massively,” Mr Oyedele said.

PT WHATSAPP CHANNEL

He explained that because Nigeria reports its public debt in naira, the depreciation of the local currency significantly increased the naira value of the country’s external debt.

According to him, the exchange-rate revaluation alone added more than ₦40 trillion to the public debt stock.

Mr Oyedele also said another major factor was the securitisation of the Ways and Means advances inherited from the previous administration, which the National Assembly approved.

He noted that the exercise brought about ₦33 trillion in previously existing obligations onto the government’s official debt records.

“It was not new borrowing; it was simply bringing previously existing obligations onto the official debt books. These factors have not always been properly explained, which is why the reported public debt appears much larger,” he said.

The minister added that a significant portion of the government’s domestic borrowing has been used to refinance maturing debt rather than to accumulate new obligations.

According to him, refinancing involves replacing existing debt with new debt to meet repayment obligations and should not be interpreted as additional borrowing.

He maintained that the Tinubu administration has adopted a cautious borrowing strategy focused on financing infrastructure and supporting long-term economic growth while keeping debt levels sustainable.

“We see debt as leverage. Every naira and every dollar borrowed should generate more value than the amount borrowed,” Mr Oyedele noted.

Budget Implementation

Beyond the debt discussion, senators expressed concern over the slow implementation of the capital component of the 2026 Appropriation Act.

Senate Chief Whip Tahir Monguno (Borno North) and Mr Aliero criticised the pace of capital project execution, stressing the need to accelerate implementation.

Responding after a closed-door meeting with the minister and members of the economic management team, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Finance, Sani Musa, assured lawmakers that implementation would improve.

Mr Musa said both the executive and the National Assembly were working to strengthen budget performance, including reviewing the current envelope budgeting approach.

According to him, the government is considering a transition to a performance- and priority-based budgeting system, alongside reforms to the contractor payment process to improve project delivery.

Nigeria’s public debt has risen sharply in recent years, reflecting a combination of fiscal deficits, exchange-rate movements and the formal recognition of previously outstanding government liabilities.

READ ALSO: Senate confirms Taiwo Oyedele as minister

Following the liberalisation of the foreign exchange market in 2023, the naira depreciated significantly against major international currencies, increasing the naira value of Nigeria’s external debt even without equivalent new foreign borrowing.

The Federal Government has consistently maintained that its borrowing strategy is aimed at financing critical infrastructure, supporting economic reforms, improving revenue generation, and maintaining debt sustainability. The issue has remained a subject of scrutiny as lawmakers and economic analysts continue to monitor the country’s fiscal position, debt-servicing costs, and budget implementation.


Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Court set to hear suit on turf battle between ICAN, forensic fraud investigators institute

info

Published

on

By

Federal high court abuja e1694386328728.jpg.webp

The Federal High Court in Abuja on Tuesday fixed Nov. 24 for hearing in a suit filed by the Chartered Institute of Forensics and Certified Fraud Investigators of Nigeria (CIFCFIN) against the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria (ICAN).

CIFCFIN is challenging the power of ICAN to train and issue qualifying certificates to forensic professionals.

The matter, which is before Justice Joyce Abdulmalik, was initially scheduled for mention on Tuesday but the case was adjourned to enable parties appear properly before the court.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that CIFCFIN, through its counsel, Shaibu Aruwa, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), sued ICAN as the sole defendant in the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1559/2026.

CIFCFIN argued that ICAN cannot offer a “Certification Programme culminating in the award of Certified Forensic Accountant of Nigeria (CFAN).”

It submitted that this was in line with the combined interpretation of Sections 2(a) – (i),3(1)(a) and 4(a) – (c), 6(2), 12(2), 13, (1) () and (g), 17(1l) (a) and (b) and 22 of the Chartered Institute of Forensics and Certified Fraud Investigators of Nigeria (Establishment) Act No. 45, 2022,

PT WHATSAPP CHANNEL
Dangote Refinery AD

Mohammed Arafat, the Head of Legal and Corporate Services of CIFCFIN, maintained in a supporting affidavit that ICAN’s invitation to applicants for a seven-day professional certification programme culminating in the award of Certified Forensic Accountant of Nigeria (CFAN), is outside its mandate and could confuse the general public.

The plaintiff alleged that ICAN had invited applicants in the fields of knowledge of chartered accountants, compliance managers, bankers, investment analysts, auditors, and anti-corruption agencies staff and other institutions to register for the programme.

CIFCFIN, therefore, prayed the court for an order setting aside and nullifying the award of the qualification or the CFAN certificate, or any other qualification or certificate in the field and practice of forensics in Nigeria by ICAN.

It urged the court to make an order for the defendant to withdraw, retract or cease any publication, gazette notice, or public representation asserting that it has power to certify or license.

CIFCFIN also sought an order of perpetual injunction restraining ICAN, its council, etc, from issuing, advertising or recognising CFAN qualification, designation, licence or certification or any title or award identical or similar to those created under the provisions of its Act.

It further sought a declaration that “by the combined provisions of Sections 2(a) -(i), 3(1)(a) and 4(a)- (c), 6(2), 12(2), 13, (1)(0) and (g), 17(1)(a) and (b) and 22 of the Chartered Institute of Forensics and Certified Fraud Investigators of Nigeria (Establishment) Act No. 45. 2022, the defendant cannot offer ‘Certification Programme’ culminating in the award of CFAN.”

(NAN)


Discover more from Premium Times Nigeria

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Business

How Bauchi Accountant-General Transferred State Funds to PrivateCompany – Witness

info

Published

on

By

Trial of the Accountant-General of Bauchi State, Sirajo Muhammed Jaja continued on Monday, September 21, 2026 at the Federal High Court in Abuja presided over by Justice Obiora Egwuatu with a witness revealing how Jaja diverted state funds to a private company.

Jaja is facing prosecution by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC ,  alongside Aliyu Abubakar, Abubakar Muhammed Hafiz, Ari Manga and Muhammed Aminu Bose, for alleged corruption.
The defendants are being prosecuted by the EFCC on an amended five-count charge ofmoney laundering, diversion of public funds, and criminal misappropriation of funds to the tune of N1,635,270,350.9 (One Billion, Six Hundred and Thirty-five Million, Two Hundred and Seventy Thousand, Three Hundred and Fifty Naira, Nine Kobo).
Prosecution counsel, Ekele E. Iheanacho, SAN told the court that the matter was for trial before calling in the first witness, PW1to testify in the court. The prosecution witness, Williams Abimbola, a compliance officer with the United Bank for Africa, UBA, said her line of duty include among others receiving requests from law enforcement agencies, responding to enquiries and any other duty assigned to her by the bank’s Chief compliance officer.
The EFCC produced the state account statement and written statement of the bank to support its claim in the court.
It is alleged that the defendants, as signatories to Bauchi State sub-treasury accounts transferred monies from the state Sub-Treasury Accounts to JASFAD Resources Enterprises managed by the first defendant, Aliyu Abubakar.
When the prosecution counsel asked the witness to explain the transaction that happened on 29 October 2024, as well as further transactions, she said, “My Lord, on the 29 of October 2024, we have three credit transfers into the account of JASFAD from the Sub-treasury Bauchi Account. We have a transfer of N13,144,500, we also had a transfer of N17,169,300, and there is a transfer of N46,030,500.
Providing details of the transactions in the account, the UBA staff said: “On the seventh of November 2024, we had a credit transfer of N17,886,250, but the teller’s details were not captured.  It just showed that transfers were made. On 15 November, we had two credit transfers transferred by order of the Sub-treasury, Bauchi Account the amount is N12,215,000 and N16,919,750 respectively.
“ On 19 November, 2024, we had another transfer by order of the sub-treasury Bauchi account for N90,373,550. On November 22,2024, we had a credit transfer from sub-treasury Bauchi account for N140,087,500. Then on 24 December, 2024, we had two credit transfers by order of sub-treasury Bauchi Account, the first one is for N24,192,000 and the second transfer is N48,892,500. On 27 December, 2024, we had two credit transfers by order of sub-treasury Bauchi account into JASFAD, the first is N335,040,000 and the second transfer is for N300,000,000.
“On the 31 December, we had two transfers by order of the Sub-treasury Bauchi Account of N14,285,527.20k. The second transfer is for N26,975,000.
On 25 February, 2025 we had a credit transfer by order of sub-treasury, Bauchi Account to JASFAD Resources of N19,840,000, and N13,020,000. On March 3, 2025, we had a credit transfer by order of sub-treasury, Bauchi account for N16,105,223.70k. On March 5, 2025, we had a credit transfer of N56,642,500. On March 7, 2025, we had a credit transfer of N45,923,790, on March 10, 2025, we had a transfer of N11,253,500. On March 12 2025, we had two credit transfer from sub-treasury Bauchi account to JASFAD Resources Enterprises, the first transfer is for N49,280,000, the second transfer is for N30,720,000, while  on March 14, 2025, we had a credit transfer by order of sub-treasury, Bauchi account of N28,262,500.
The witness informed the court that on 25 February, 2025, there were two credits from the Subtreasury Bauchi account to JASFAD Resources account

The post How Bauchi Accountant-General Transferred State Funds to PrivateCompany – Witness appeared first on Business Today NG.

Continue Reading

Trending