Ogun, Kano and Delta have the highest reported Right of Way (RoW) charges among Nigeria’s 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory, with Ogun charging ₦6,600 per linear metre, more than twice the rates reported by the next two states.
An analysis of three RoW datasets by the Nigerian Communications Commission reviewed by Technology Times shows a wide disparity in the reported cost of securing Right of Way for infrastructure deployment across the country.
Ogun records the highest charge at ₦6,600 per metre, followed by Kano at ₦2,754 and Delta at ₦2,706.
The three states are the only jurisdictions in the supplied datasets with RoW charges above ₦2,700 per linear metre.
The figures place Ogun significantly ahead of the other two states. Its reported charge is ₦3,846 per metre higher than Kano and ₦3,894 higher than Delta.
Together, the three states form the highest-cost tier in the 37-jurisdiction dataset comprising all 36 states and the FCT.
Dapo Abiodun, Governor of Ogun State. Image credit: Ogun State Governmrnt.
An analysis of three RoW datasets by the Nigerian Communications Commission reviewed by Technology Times shows a wide disparity in the reported cost of securing Right of Way for infrastructure deployment across the country. Ogun records the highest charge at ₦6,600 per metre, followed by Kano at ₦2,754 and Delta at ₦2,706. The three states are the only jurisdictions in the supplied datasets with RoW charges above ₦2,700 per linear metre.
Top three RoW charges
Rank
State
RoW charge per linear metre
Difference from Ogun
1
Ogun
₦6,600
—
2
Kano
₦2,754
₦3,846 lower
3
Delta
₦2,706
₦3,894 lower
The three-state comparison shows the sharp concentration at the top of the RoW pricing table.
Ogun’s ₦6,600 charge is approximately 2.4 times Kano’s ₦2,754 and 2.4 times Delta’s ₦2,706.
Kano and Delta, however, are almost evenly matched, with a difference of only ₦48 per metre.
Ogun stands clearly above the other states
The most significant finding in the dataset is Ogun’s position at the top.
At ₦6,600 per metre, its reported RoW charge is substantially higher than every other jurisdiction in the three tables.
The difference becomes particularly visible when the charges are translated into hypothetical route lengths.
Fibre route
Ogun at ₦6,600/m
Kano at ₦2,754/m
Delta at ₦2,706/m
10 km
₦66m
₦27.54m
₦27.06m
50 km
₦330m
₦137.7m
₦135.3m
100 km
₦660m
₦275.4m
₦270.6m
500 km
₦3.3bn
₦1.377bn
₦1.353bn
These calculations are illustrations based solely on multiplying the reported per-metre charge by the stated route length. They do not represent estimates of actual project costs.
Nevertheless, they demonstrate the significance of the difference.
For every 100 km of infrastructure, the reported RoW charge would be ₦660 million in Ogun, compared with ₦275.4 million in Kano and ₦270.6 million in Delta, if the applicable rate were applied uniformly across the entire route.
The difference between Ogun and Delta alone would therefore be ₦389.4 million for 100 km.
Kano and Delta form a closely matched second tier
While Ogun is the clear outlier, Kano and Delta are almost identical in the supplied data.
Kano’s reported charge is ₦2,754 per metre, while Delta’s is ₦2,706.
The difference is just:
₦2,754 − ₦2,706 = ₦48 per metre.
That means Kano’s charge is only about 1.8% higher than Delta’s.
For a 10 km route, the difference between the two states would be:
₦27.54 million − ₦27.06 million = ₦480,000.
At 100 km, the difference would rise to ₦4.8 million.
The close positioning of Kano and Delta contrasts sharply with the much larger gap separating them from Ogun.
Abba Kabir Yusuf, Governor of Kano State. Image credit: Kano State Government.
For every 100 km of infrastructure, the reported RoW charge would be ₦660 million in Ogun, compared with ₦275.4 million in Kano and ₦270.6 million in Delta, if the applicable rate were applied uniformly across the entire route. The difference between Ogun and Delta alone would therefore be ₦389.4 million for 100 km.
The top three are substantially above the rest
The wider dataset contains nine jurisdictions with charges above ₦145 per metre.
After Ogun, Kano and Delta, the next highest reported charges are:
Rank
Jurisdiction
RoW charge
1
Ogun
₦6,600
2
Kano
₦2,754
3
Delta
₦2,706
4
Rivers
₦2,256
5
Akwa Ibom
₦2,000
6
Osun
₦1,500
7
FCT, Abuja
₦950
8=
Bayelsa
₦850
8=
Lagos
₦850
This ranking places the three leading states in a distinct position.
Ogun is ₦3,846 per metre above Kano, while Kano and Delta are separated by only ₦48.
The fourth-ranked jurisdiction, Rivers, is also considerably below the top three at ₦2,256.
Thus, the supplied data points to a particularly steep increase at the very top of the ranking.
The top three compared with the ₦145 group
The significance of the three highest charges becomes even clearer when they are compared with the 16 states in the second dataset, all of which report ₦145 per metre.
State
Reported RoW charge
Multiple of ₦145
Ogun
₦6,600
45.5×
Kano
₦2,754
19.0×
Delta
₦2,706
18.7×
₦145 group
₦145
1×
Ogun’s reported rate is therefore 45.5 times the ₦145 charge.
Kano’s rate is approximately 19 times higher, while Delta’s is about 18.7 times higher.
This difference has direct implications for the nominal cost of long fibre routes.
A 10 km route at ₦145 per metre would generate a reported RoW charge of ₦1.45 million.
The same 10 km at the three highest reported rates would cost:
Ogun: ₦66 million
Kano: ₦27.54 million
Delta: ₦27.06 million
The Ogun figure is therefore ₦64.55 million higher than the ₦145 scenario for every 10 km.
Sheriff Oborevwori, Governor of Delta State. Image credit: Delta State Goverment.
Across all 37 jurisdictions, the reported charges add up to ₦22,786 per metre when each jurisdiction’s figure is counted once. Ogun, Kano and Delta together account for: ₦6,600 + ₦2,754 + ₦2,706 = ₦12,060. That means the top three alone account for approximately 52.9% of the combined reported charges across all 37 jurisdictions. This is striking because they represent only three of the 37 jurisdictions, or approximately 8.1% of the jurisdictions in the dataset.
The contrast with zero-charge states is even greater
The third dataset identifies 12 states with a reported RoW charge of ₦0.
These are Adamawa, Anambra, Bauchi, Benue, Enugu, Jigawa, Kaduna, Katsina, Kebbi, Nasarawa, Niger and Zamfara.
That creates an even wider range between the top three states and the zero-charge group.
Category
RoW charge per metre
Nominal charge for 10 km
12 zero-charge states
₦0
₦0
16 ₦145 states
₦145
₦1.45m
Delta
₦2,706
₦27.06m
Kano
₦2,754
₦27.54m
Ogun
₦6,600
₦66m
The three datasets therefore show a national RoW range running from ₦0 to ₦6,600 per metre.
The difference between the lowest and highest reported rates is ₦6,600 per metre.
For a 100 km route, that translates into a difference of ₦660 million between the zero-charge scenario and Ogun’s reported rate.
Again, this is a mathematical comparison of the supplied charges and not a claim about the total cost of fibre deployment.
Top three account for a disproportionate share of reported charges
There is another important feature of the data.
Across all 37 jurisdictions, the reported charges add up to ₦22,786 per metre when each jurisdiction’s figure is counted once.
Ogun, Kano and Delta together account for:
₦6,600 + ₦2,754 + ₦2,706 = ₦12,060.
That means the top three alone account for approximately 52.9% of the combined reported charges across all 37 jurisdictions.
This is striking because they represent only three of the 37 jurisdictions, or approximately 8.1% of the jurisdictions in the dataset.
The calculation illustrates how heavily the national aggregate is influenced by the highest charges.
Ogun alone contributes ₦6,600, or approximately 29% of the combined reported charges across the 37 jurisdictions.
The top three therefore dominate the numerical distribution even though they represent a relatively small proportion of the jurisdictions covered.
What the full ranking reveals
The top three should also be understood against the wider distribution.
Pricing category
Number of jurisdictions
Share
₦0
12
32.4%
₦145
16
43.2%
Above ₦145
9
24.3%
Total
37
100%
The data shows that 28 of the 37 jurisdictions, or 75.7%, have reported charges of ₦145 or less.
Only nine jurisdictions are above ₦145.
Ogun, Kano and Delta are therefore not representative of the largest group of states in the dataset. Instead, they are the three highest points within a smaller high-charge category.
This makes their ranking particularly significant from a national infrastructure perspective.
Potential implications for digital infrastructure economics
The figures analysed by Technology Times show that the financial exposure associated with RoW can vary dramatically depending on the jurisdiction.
For network operators and infrastructure companies, the difference becomes more material as the length of a fibre route increases.
At 10 km, the difference between Ogun and Delta is ₦38.94 million.
At 100 km, it becomes ₦389.4 million.
At 500 km, it reaches ₦1.947 billion.
These calculations demonstrate why a per-metre charge can become significant when applied to long-distance infrastructure.
The tables do not provide information about actual fibre routes, network investment, construction costs or whether the stated charge is applied uniformly to every kilometre of a project. Therefore, the data cannot establish the precise financial impact on individual operators or projects.
What it does establish is that the reported RoW charge itself varies considerably across jurisdictions.
Ogun’s position is the central finding
The strongest development from the supplied data is Ogun’s position.
At ₦6,600 per metre, Ogun is:
the highest-priced jurisdiction in the three datasets;
₦3,846 per metre above Kano;
₦3,894 per metre above Delta;
approximately 45.5 times the ₦145 rate;
and the only jurisdiction in the supplied data above ₦6,000 per metre.
Kano and Delta occupy the next two positions, with almost identical charges.
Their close pricing suggests a second tier immediately below Ogun, while the gap between the third and fourth positions, Delta’s ₦2,706 and Rivers’ ₦2,256, is ₦450 per metre.
National perspective
The three datasets collectively indicate that Nigeria’s reported RoW charges are highly uneven.
Twelve states report no charge, 16 report ₦145 per metre, and nine report higher charges.
Within that nine-state group, Ogun, Kano and Delta lead the ranking.
Their combined charge of ₦12,060 per metre represents more than half of the sum of all reported jurisdiction-level charges in the dataset, despite the three jurisdictions accounting for only 8.1% of the 37 jurisdictions represented.
The data therefore points to a concentrated high-cost segment within an otherwise predominantly low-charge national distribution.
For digital infrastructure deployment, the key issue raised by the figures is the extent to which jurisdictional differences in RoW charges can alter the nominal economics of extending fibre networks across Nigeria.
A 10 km route at Ogun’s reported rate would attract ₦66 million in RoW charges, compared with ₦27.54 million in Kano and ₦27.06 million in Delta. At the ₦145 rate, the same route would cost ₦1.45 million, while the 12 zero-charge states record no RoW charge in the supplied data.
The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has omitted former Minister of Communications and Digital Economy, Isa Pantami, from its final list of governorship candidates for Gombe State ahead of the February 6, 2027 election.
Politics Nigeria reports that the commission released a list of 16 cleared candidates for the election, but Pantami’s name was missing despite his earlier inclusion in the provisional list published on August 29.
Among the candidates on the final list are Bala Bello Tinka of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), Jamilu Isyaku Gwamna of the All Progressives Congress (APC) and Babayo Ardo Kumo of the Nigerian Democratic Congress (NDC).
Others include Zubairu Mu’azu Halilu of the Labour Party (LP), Lamela L. Silas of the Allied Peoples Movement (APM), Ibrahim Jalo Abubakar of the Peoples Redemption Party (PRP) and Adamu Mohammed Ma’aji of the Social Democratic Party (SDP).
Pantami’s exclusion comes amid a series of legal disputes over his emergence as the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governorship candidate in the state.
The former minister had initially sought the APC governorship ticket but left the party after it settled for Gwamna as its consensus candidate. He subsequently joined the PDP and emerged as the party’s flag bearer through voice affirmation at its governorship primary.
However, a Federal High Court sitting in Gombe nullified his initial emergence on May 26, following a challenge to the primary process.
The court ordered a fresh primary election, which Pantami won on September 29 with 2,054 votes, defeating Khamisu Ahmed Mailantarki and Usman Aliyu Garry.
Garry had challenged Pantami’s emergence, arguing that the required primary election was not properly conducted before the former minister was declared the party’s candidate.
Despite winning the court-ordered rerun, Pantami’s eligibility remained in doubt following the Supreme Court’s September 24, 2026 judgment on provisions of the Electoral Act 2026 governing political party membership registers and candidate eligibility.
The Supreme Court affirmed the constitutionality of Sections 77(5), 77(6) and 77(7) of the Electoral Act 2026 and upheld INEC’s revised timetable and schedule of activities for the 2027 elections.
The provisions bar political parties from fielding candidates whose names were not included in the membership registers submitted to INEC within the stipulated period.
INEC has maintained that parties found to have violated the requirements will not be permitted to participate in the elections through candidates whose nominations breach the law.
Mohammed Haruna, an INEC national commissioner in charge of information and voter education, said the commission would not allow parties to replace candidates affected by the provisions.
Haruna made the clarification during an appearance on Trust TV’s programme on Wednesday evening, explaining that allowing substitutions would enable political parties to benefit from their own violations.
INEC Chairman, Professor Joash Ojo Amupitan
He cited previous disputes involving Zamfara and Plateau states to illustrate the consequences of parties failing to comply with electoral requirements.
“It’s like you committed an offence. And then, you come and benefit from it,” Haruna said.
He added that allowing parties to substitute candidates in such circumstances would amount to permitting them to benefit from an offence they had committed.
Haruna also indicated that the commission expected to make a definite pronouncement on the implications of the Supreme Court judgment by the following Tuesday.