Connect with us

News

Ogun, Kano, Delta top Nigeria’s highest Right of Way charges for fibre – Technology Times

info

Published

on

News cover.png

Ogun, Kano and Delta have the highest reported Right of Way (RoW) charges among Nigeria’s 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory, with Ogun charging ₦6,600 per linear metre, more than twice the rates reported by the next two states.

An analysis of three RoW datasets by the Nigerian Communications Commission reviewed by Technology Times shows a wide disparity in the reported cost of securing Right of Way for infrastructure deployment across the country.

Ogun records the highest charge at ₦6,600 per metre, followed by Kano at ₦2,754 and Delta at ₦2,706.

The three states are the only jurisdictions in the supplied datasets with RoW charges above ₦2,700 per linear metre.

The figures place Ogun significantly ahead of the other two states. Its reported charge is ₦3,846 per metre higher than Kano and ₦3,894 higher than Delta.

Together, the three states form the highest-cost tier in the 37-jurisdiction dataset comprising all 36 states and the FCT.

 

Dapo Abiodun, Governor of Ogun State. Image credit: Ogun State Governmrnt.

 

An analysis of three RoW datasets by the Nigerian Communications Commission reviewed by Technology Times shows a wide disparity in the reported cost of securing Right of Way for infrastructure deployment across the country. Ogun records the highest charge at ₦6,600 per metre, followed by Kano at ₦2,754 and Delta at ₦2,706. The three states are the only jurisdictions in the supplied datasets with RoW charges above ₦2,700 per linear metre.

 

Top three RoW charges

Rank State RoW charge per linear metre Difference from Ogun
1 Ogun ₦6,600 —
2 Kano ₦2,754 ₦3,846 lower
3 Delta ₦2,706 ₦3,894 lower

The three-state comparison shows the sharp concentration at the top of the RoW pricing table.

Ogun’s ₦6,600 charge is approximately 2.4 times Kano’s ₦2,754 and 2.4 times Delta’s ₦2,706.

Kano and Delta, however, are almost evenly matched, with a difference of only ₦48 per metre.

Ogun stands clearly above the other states

The most significant finding in the dataset is Ogun’s position at the top.

At ₦6,600 per metre, its reported RoW charge is substantially higher than every other jurisdiction in the three tables.

The difference becomes particularly visible when the charges are translated into hypothetical route lengths.

Fibre route Ogun at ₦6,600/m Kano at ₦2,754/m Delta at ₦2,706/m
10 km ₦66m ₦27.54m ₦27.06m
50 km ₦330m ₦137.7m ₦135.3m
100 km ₦660m ₦275.4m ₦270.6m
500 km ₦3.3bn ₦1.377bn ₦1.353bn

These calculations are illustrations based solely on multiplying the reported per-metre charge by the stated route length. They do not represent estimates of actual project costs.

Nevertheless, they demonstrate the significance of the difference.

For every 100 km of infrastructure, the reported RoW charge would be ₦660 million in Ogun, compared with ₦275.4 million in Kano and ₦270.6 million in Delta, if the applicable rate were applied uniformly across the entire route.

The difference between Ogun and Delta alone would therefore be ₦389.4 million for 100 km.

Kano and Delta form a closely matched second tier

While Ogun is the clear outlier, Kano and Delta are almost identical in the supplied data.

Kano’s reported charge is ₦2,754 per metre, while Delta’s is ₦2,706.

The difference is just:

₦2,754 − ₦2,706 = ₦48 per metre.

That means Kano’s charge is only about 1.8% higher than Delta’s.

For a 10 km route, the difference between the two states would be:

₦27.54 million − ₦27.06 million = ₦480,000.

At 100 km, the difference would rise to ₦4.8 million.

The close positioning of Kano and Delta contrasts sharply with the much larger gap separating them from Ogun.

Abba Kabir Yusuf, Governor of Kano State. Image credit: Kano State Government.

For every 100 km of infrastructure, the reported RoW charge would be ₦660 million in Ogun, compared with ₦275.4 million in Kano and ₦270.6 million in Delta, if the applicable rate were applied uniformly across the entire route. The difference between Ogun and Delta alone would therefore be ₦389.4 million for 100 km.

The top three are substantially above the rest

The wider dataset contains nine jurisdictions with charges above ₦145 per metre.

After Ogun, Kano and Delta, the next highest reported charges are:

Rank Jurisdiction RoW charge
1 Ogun ₦6,600
2 Kano ₦2,754
3 Delta ₦2,706
4 Rivers ₦2,256
5 Akwa Ibom ₦2,000
6 Osun ₦1,500
7 FCT, Abuja ₦950
8= Bayelsa ₦850
8= Lagos ₦850

This ranking places the three leading states in a distinct position.

Ogun is ₦3,846 per metre above Kano, while Kano and Delta are separated by only ₦48.

The fourth-ranked jurisdiction, Rivers, is also considerably below the top three at ₦2,256.

Thus, the supplied data points to a particularly steep increase at the very top of the ranking.

The top three compared with the ₦145 group

The significance of the three highest charges becomes even clearer when they are compared with the 16 states in the second dataset, all of which report ₦145 per metre.

State Reported RoW charge Multiple of ₦145
Ogun ₦6,600 45.5×
Kano ₦2,754 19.0×
Delta ₦2,706 18.7×
₦145 group ₦145 1×

Ogun’s reported rate is therefore 45.5 times the ₦145 charge.

Kano’s rate is approximately 19 times higher, while Delta’s is about 18.7 times higher.

This difference has direct implications for the nominal cost of long fibre routes.

A 10 km route at ₦145 per metre would generate a reported RoW charge of ₦1.45 million.

The same 10 km at the three highest reported rates would cost:

  • Ogun: ₦66 million
  • Kano: ₦27.54 million
  • Delta: ₦27.06 million

The Ogun figure is therefore ₦64.55 million higher than the ₦145 scenario for every 10 km.

Sheriff Oborevwori, Governor of Delta State. Image credit: Delta State Goverment.

Across all 37 jurisdictions, the reported charges add up to ₦22,786 per metre when each jurisdiction’s figure is counted once. Ogun, Kano and Delta together account for: ₦6,600 + ₦2,754 + ₦2,706 = ₦12,060. That means the top three alone account for approximately 52.9% of the combined reported charges across all 37 jurisdictions. This is striking because they represent only three of the 37 jurisdictions, or approximately 8.1% of the jurisdictions in the dataset.

The contrast with zero-charge states is even greater

The third dataset identifies 12 states with a reported RoW charge of ₦0.

These are Adamawa, Anambra, Bauchi, Benue, Enugu, Jigawa, Kaduna, Katsina, Kebbi, Nasarawa, Niger and Zamfara.

That creates an even wider range between the top three states and the zero-charge group.

Category RoW charge per metre Nominal charge for 10 km
12 zero-charge states ₦0 ₦0
16 ₦145 states ₦145 ₦1.45m
Delta ₦2,706 ₦27.06m
Kano ₦2,754 ₦27.54m
Ogun ₦6,600 ₦66m

The three datasets therefore show a national RoW range running from ₦0 to ₦6,600 per metre.

The difference between the lowest and highest reported rates is ₦6,600 per metre.

For a 100 km route, that translates into a difference of ₦660 million between the zero-charge scenario and Ogun’s reported rate.

Again, this is a mathematical comparison of the supplied charges and not a claim about the total cost of fibre deployment.

Top three account for a disproportionate share of reported charges

There is another important feature of the data.

Across all 37 jurisdictions, the reported charges add up to ₦22,786 per metre when each jurisdiction’s figure is counted once.

Ogun, Kano and Delta together account for:

₦6,600 + ₦2,754 + ₦2,706 = ₦12,060.

That means the top three alone account for approximately 52.9% of the combined reported charges across all 37 jurisdictions.

This is striking because they represent only three of the 37 jurisdictions, or approximately 8.1% of the jurisdictions in the dataset.

The calculation illustrates how heavily the national aggregate is influenced by the highest charges.

Ogun alone contributes ₦6,600, or approximately 29% of the combined reported charges across the 37 jurisdictions.

The top three therefore dominate the numerical distribution even though they represent a relatively small proportion of the jurisdictions covered.

What the full ranking reveals

The top three should also be understood against the wider distribution.

Pricing category Number of jurisdictions Share
₦0 12 32.4%
₦145 16 43.2%
Above ₦145 9 24.3%
Total 37 100%

The data shows that 28 of the 37 jurisdictions, or 75.7%, have reported charges of ₦145 or less.

Only nine jurisdictions are above ₦145.

Ogun, Kano and Delta are therefore not representative of the largest group of states in the dataset. Instead, they are the three highest points within a smaller high-charge category.

This makes their ranking particularly significant from a national infrastructure perspective.

Potential implications for digital infrastructure economics

The figures analysed by Technology Times show that the financial exposure associated with RoW can vary dramatically depending on the jurisdiction.

For network operators and infrastructure companies, the difference becomes more material as the length of a fibre route increases.

At 10 km, the difference between Ogun and Delta is ₦38.94 million.

At 100 km, it becomes ₦389.4 million.

At 500 km, it reaches ₦1.947 billion.

These calculations demonstrate why a per-metre charge can become significant when applied to long-distance infrastructure.

The tables do not provide information about actual fibre routes, network investment, construction costs or whether the stated charge is applied uniformly to every kilometre of a project. Therefore, the data cannot establish the precise financial impact on individual operators or projects.

What it does establish is that the reported RoW charge itself varies considerably across jurisdictions.

Ogun’s position is the central finding

The strongest development from the supplied data is Ogun’s position.

At ₦6,600 per metre, Ogun is:

  • the highest-priced jurisdiction in the three datasets;
  • ₦3,846 per metre above Kano;
  • ₦3,894 per metre above Delta;
  • approximately 45.5 times the ₦145 rate;
  • and the only jurisdiction in the supplied data above ₦6,000 per metre.

Kano and Delta occupy the next two positions, with almost identical charges.

Their close pricing suggests a second tier immediately below Ogun, while the gap between the third and fourth positions, Delta’s ₦2,706 and Rivers’ ₦2,256, is ₦450 per metre.

National perspective

The three datasets collectively indicate that Nigeria’s reported RoW charges are highly uneven.

Twelve states report no charge, 16 report ₦145 per metre, and nine report higher charges.

Within that nine-state group, Ogun, Kano and Delta lead the ranking.

Their combined charge of ₦12,060 per metre represents more than half of the sum of all reported jurisdiction-level charges in the dataset, despite the three jurisdictions accounting for only 8.1% of the 37 jurisdictions represented.

The data therefore points to a concentrated high-cost segment within an otherwise predominantly low-charge national distribution.

For digital infrastructure deployment, the key issue raised by the figures is the extent to which jurisdictional differences in RoW charges can alter the nominal economics of extending fibre networks across Nigeria.

A 10 km route at Ogun’s reported rate would attract ₦66 million in RoW charges, compared with ₦27.54 million in Kano and ₦27.06 million in Delta. At the ₦145 rate, the same route would cost ₦1.45 million, while the 12 zero-charge states record no RoW charge in the supplied data.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

WIll Nigeria’s Failure To Reach AFCON 2015 Be Repeated Due To Super Eagles’ 3-0 Loss In Bissau?

info

Published

on

IMG 20261001 WA0003.jpg

An ominous question is rolling through various football circles in Nigeria, as observers begin to ask if the country’s inability to qualify for the 2015 Africa Cup of Nations will be repeated next year, Sports247 reports.

The rhetorical question is recurring due to the Super Eagles’ shock 3-0 loss away to Guinea-Bissau in their second match of the 2027 AFCON qualifiers, which revived memories of a similar set back 12 years ago.

Tuesday’s heavy defeat in Bissau brought back agonising memories of September 6th, 2014, when Congo Republic stunned the Super Eagles 3-2 at U.J. Esuene Stadium in Calabar and Nigeria subsequently failed to qualify for the 2015 AFCON in Equatorial Guinea.

The Eagles ultimately finished third in their qualifying group and failed to defend the title they had won two years earlier in South Africa, under the guidance of former national team captain and reliable defender, late Stephen Okechukwu Keshi (The Big Boss).

Sequel to Tuesday’s game at September 24 Stadium, Guinea-Bissau now lead Group L with six points and a goal difference of +5, while Nigeria sit second with three points and -2 goal difference, which makes it imperative that the Super Eagles must win all their remaining four matches.

However, aside from winning all the matches, the Eagles must beat Guinea-Bissau 4-0 during their last game in March 2027 to edge The Wild Dogs on head-to-head rules, while also noting that only one country will qualify from their group, because Tanzania are already in as co-hosts.

Consequently, the possibility of history repeating itself, with another failed qualification for AFCON ensuing at the end of the ongoing qualifiers, has now become an issue for heated debate in many football circles, publications and social media platforms.

Tribal Football’s Shina Oludare recalled with a post on his X handle @sportingshina: “The last time the Super Eagles conceded three goals against African opposition was 12 years ago.

“(It was) on September 6, 2014, when they suffered a shock 3-2 home defeat to Congo in an AFCON qualifier. Nigeria subsequently failed to qualify for AFCON 2015. Will history repeat itself?”

Sports247 reports further that, heading into MatchDay 3, Guinea-Bissau have six points, having started with a 2-0 victory away to co-hosts Tanzania, while Nigeria had an unconvincing 2-1 comeback win against Madagascar in Uyo, which cast further doubt about their ability to rise from the abyss.

The fear among many critical Nigerians now is that the Eagles will suffer a repeat of the damaging home draws they had with Lesotho, South Africa and Zimbabwe in the 2026 FIFA World Cup qualifiers; which ultimately knocked them out.

Although the Eagles’ last match of the 2027 AFCON qualifiers will be at home against Guinea-Bissau in March, many Nigerians already doubt their team’s ability to win that fixture, which would be very decisive in their quest for a ticket to the tournament.

Continue Reading

Business

NANS Endorses Insurance Industry Reforms, Condemns moves to Derail Recapitalisation

info

Published

on

BY NKECHI NAECHE-ESEZOBOR—The National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS), on Wednesday declared its support for National Insurance Commission, (NAICOM), and the ongoing transformation of Nigeria’s insurance industry, while condemning what it described as attempts to derail the sector’s recapitalisation exercise.

According to statement signed by its President, Comrade Akinteye Babatunde Afeez, said  the association said it stands with the  Commission and the reforms introduced under the Nigerian Insurance Industry Reform Act (NIIRA) 2025.

The statement reads as follows:

The National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS) National Secretariat, the umbrella body representing over 40.1 Million Nigerian Students across universities, polytechnics, and colleges of education, hereby issues this statement in support of the transformative reforms currently reshaping Nigeria’s insurance industry.
NANS recognizes the strategic importance of a strong, modern, and resilient insurance sector to national economic development and commends the leadership of the Federal Government under President Bola Ahmed Tinubu GCFR, for initiating bold economic reforms aimed at positioning Nigeria for sustainable growth and the realization of its $1 trillion economy aspiration.
We equally commend the leadership of NAICOM under the Commissioner for Insurance, Mr. Olusegun Ayo Omosehin, and the Governing Board chaired by Hajia Halima Kyari, for their commitment to implementing far-reaching reforms that are restoring confidence, improving consumer protection, strengthening industry capacity, and promoting greater public trust in the insurance sector.

Today, we speak not merely as students but as stakeholders in Nigeria’s future. We cannot remain silent while certain unpatriotic elements seek to undermine reforms that hold significant promise for economic transformation, youth empowerment, consumer protection, and national development.

NANS joins all well-meaning Nigerians in celebrating President Bola Ahmed Tinubu GCFR’s historic assent to the Nigerian Insurance Industry Reform Act (NIIRA) on 31 July 2025, a historic legislation that modernized Nigeria’s insurance regulatory framework and replaced obsolete legal provisions with a comprehensive regime suited for a modern economy.
The NIIRA 2025 represents one of the most significant legislative interventions in Nigeria’s financial services sector in recent history.

For Nigerian students, the law opens new opportunities for financial inclusion, entrepreneurship, employment, and career development within a sector that has historically been underutilized despite its enormous economic potential.
NANS therefore fully endorses the objectives and implementation of the NIIRA 2025 and commends Mr. President for providing the legal foundation upon which the ongoing transformation of the insurance sector is being built.

*SUPPORT FOR THE RECAPITALISATION OF THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY*

One of the most important reforms emanating from NIIRA 2025 is the recapitalisation of the insurance industry.
For decades, insufficient capitalization limited the capacity of many insurance operators to meet growing market demands and support large-scale economic activities. The recapitalisation exercise was therefore not merely a regulatory requirement but a strategic intervention designed to strengthen insurers and ensure prompt settlement of legitimate claims.

NANS strongly supports the successful implementation of the recapitalisation exercise by NAICOM and commends the insurance companies that complied with the new capital requirements in furtherance of industry stability and growth.

No modern economy can thrive without a vibrant insurance industry capable of protecting investments, facilitating business continuity, absorbing risks, supporting infrastructure development, and promoting financial confidence across all sectors.
The recapitalisation exercise is therefore a critical pillar of Nigeria’s journey toward becoming a trillion-dollar economy and deserves the support of all patriotic Nigerians.

*COMMENDATION FOR NAICOM’S INVESTMENT IN TERTIARY EDUCATION*

NANS expresses profound appreciation to NAICOM for its longstanding support for tertiary education through the Insurance Education Fund and related interventions.
Over the years, these initiatives have contributed to the development of critical infrastructure in universities, polytechnics, and colleges of education, including ICT centres, laboratories, and academic facilities that directly benefit Nigerian students.
Such investments reflect NAICOM’s broader commitment to human capital development and the future of the nation’s youth.

As beneficiaries of these interventions, Nigerian students recognize and appreciate the positive impact these investments continue to make across institutions of higher learning nationwide.

*CONDEMNATION OF ATTEMPTS TO UNDERMINE INSURANCE SECTOR REFORMS*

It is deeply concerning that at a time when the Nigerian insurance industry is recording unprecedented reforms and achievements, certain individuals and groups have embarked on campaigns aimed at discrediting the regulator, undermining the recapitalisation exercise that have attracted widespread commendation from all stakeholders.

NANS views these actions as deliberate attempts to derail the progress being made within the sector and ultimately frustrate the reform agenda of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.
We are particularly disturbed by calls for the removal of the leadership of NAICOM despite the significant progress achieved in strengthening regulation, enhancing consumer protection, improving market confidence, and implementing critical reforms that have long been demanded by stakeholders.
Such calls are neither constructive nor patriotic.

NANS therefore urges Nigerians to be vigilant and reject misinformation, sensational allegations, and campaigns intended to undermine institutions that are working in the national interest.
As a responsible, proactive and principles organization, NANS has independently reviewed publicly available information concerning NAICOM’s operations, reforms, and achievements.

Based on our findings, we have found no credible basis for the allegations being promoted by such groups.
On the contrary, available evidence points to a regulator implementing statutory reforms in accordance with its mandate.
We therefore reject any attempt to recruit Nigerian students into campaigns of calumny, misinformation or institutional sabotage.

Let it be known that Nigerian students are not instruments for advancing narrow interests against national development. We stand firmly on the side of truth, transparency, reform, and progress.

*COMMENDATION FOR IMPROVED CLAIMS SETTLEMENT AND CONSUMER PROTECTION*

NANS commends NAICOM’s firm stance on prompt claims settlement and its “zero-tolerance approach toward the non-payment of genuine claims.”
The Commission’s consistent emphasis on consumer protection has contributed significantly to rebuilding confidence in the industry and improving public perception of insurance as a reliable financial safeguard.

*THE INSURANCE POLICYHOLDERS PROTECTION FUND: A GAME-CHANGING INITIATIVE*

NANS applauds the establishment of the Insurance Policyholders Protection Fund (IPPF), one of the landmark innovations introduced under the NIIRA 2025.
This initiative demonstrates a clear commitment to ensuring that ordinary Nigerians, including students, youths, and vulnerable consumers, do not lose their legitimate entitlements due to circumstances beyond their control.

We encourage NAICOM to intensify public awareness campaigns so that Nigerians fully understand the protections available to them under the new insurance regime.

*NANS’ UNWAVERING COMMITMENT TO THE REFORM AGENDA*

NANS hereby reaffirms its unwavering support for the ongoing transformation of Nigeria’s insurance industry. We recognize that these reforms are interconnected components of a bold agenda designed to strengthen the insurance sector and contribute meaningfully to national development.

Accordingly, NANS pledges to:
• Mobilize Nigerian students in support of insurance awareness and financial literacy initiatives.
• Promote insurance as a viable career pathway for graduates and young professionals.
• Encourage students participation in youth-focused insurance development programmes.
• Advocate for the protection and expansion of initiatives that support education and youth empowerment.
• Support reforms that strengthen consumer protection, transparency, accountability, and institutional excellence.

*CALL TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND ALL NIGERIANS*

NANS calls on President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, the Federal Government, the National Assembly, industry stakeholders, the media, and all well-meaning Nigerians to continue supporting the Insurance industry’s reform agenda. These transformations are not merely a regulatory exercise. It is a national economic imperative that has the potential to unlock investment, create jobs, enhance financial security, promote economic stability, and accelerate Nigeria’s march toward sustainable prosperity.

A strong insurance sector is a foundation for a strong economy. A strong economy is a pathway to reduced poverty, increased opportunities, and a better future for Nigerian youths.

We therefore urge all Nigerians to reject divisive narratives, support constructive reforms, and stand firmly behind initiatives that advance the national interest.

CONCLUSION
The National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS) National Headquarters stands firmly with NAICOM. We stand with every Nigerian student, every policyholder, every investor, and every citizen who desires a transparent, efficient, and globally competitive insurance industry.

We shall continue to support genuine reforms, defend institutions that are delivering measurable results, and oppose all attempts to undermine progress for personal or sectional interests.

The transformation of Nigeria’s insurance sector is a transformation that serves the interests of present and future generations. It must be protected, sustained, and driven to its logical conclusion.

The post NANS Endorses Insurance Industry Reforms, Condemns moves to Derail Recapitalisation appeared first on Business Today NG.

Continue Reading

Trending