Connect with us

Business

EXPLAINER: What Tinubu’s new deep offshore tax incentives mean for Nigeria

info

Published

on

HIVur 4XwAAHMRZ scaled e1779638155832.jpg

MTN ADVERT

President Bola Tinubu announced on Tuesday that he approved the Deep Offshore Oil and Gas Tax Credit Order, 2026—a new fiscal incentive designed to attract large-scale investments into Nigeria’s deep offshore oil and gas sector.

The Nigerian leader hinted that the policy is aimed at making previously stalled offshore projects commercially viable by offering investors tax incentives and greater certainty over the fiscal terms governing their investments.

“I have signed the Deep Offshore Oil and Gas Projects Incentives (Tax Remission) Order, 2026, creating a clear and predictable framework capable of unlocking up to $50 billion in deep offshore investment, beginning with the approximately $10 billion Bonga South West project,” the president wrote.

He explained that for too long, some of Nigeria’s biggest offshore opportunities have remained stalled, and that “We cannot afford to leave that opportunity beneath our waters for another decade.”

The president explained that as capital moves, countries compete for the resources, and investors committing billions of dollars over many years need certainty.

PT WHATSAPP CHANNEL

“We are providing that certainty, with a clear window for existing deep offshore leases to reach Final Investment Decision by 31 December 2029 and qualify for the full standard incentive,” he said.

The order marks the tenth major policy directive of the Tinubu-led administration targeted specifically at the oil and gas sector. It clearly demonstrates the deliberate efforts being made by the government to remove constraints holding back investment, production and value creation in the country’s oil and gas industry.

But beyond attracting capital, the federal government says it wants the new investments to generate jobs, strengthen Nigerian businesses and build local technical capacity.

“Our natural resources must work harder for our people. Nigeria First,” the president wrote on his official Facebook page on Wednesday.

Why did the government introduce the new incentive?

The deep offshore framework announced on Tuesday came seven months after Shell Plc signalled moves to renew and expand investment push in Nigeria, citing improved political stability, policy consistency, and leadership as key factors driving its confidence in the country’s energy sector.

During a courtesy visit to President Tinubu early this year, the Chief Executive Officer of Shell Plc, Wael Sawan, disclosed the company’s investment plans and explained that Nigeria now stands out as one of the most attractive destinations for capital allocation within Shell’s global portfolio.

“We think there is more to invest here, and we understand the vision that you (President Bola Tinubu) have for the country, and so we are indeed working on a project, Bonga Southwest, that could potentially, if we get to an FID stage, see us, with the partners, invest around $20 billion in foreign direct investment,” Mr Sawan said at the time.

The policy was also announced less than a month after 31 companies emerged winners of 37 oil and gas blocks in Nigeria’s 2025 Licensing Round following the conclusion of the commercial bid conference held in Abuja last month.

Nigeria has significant oil and gas resources located in deep offshore fields, but several large projects have remained undeveloped for years. Similarly, oil and gas exploration activities across Nigeria’s major oil fields have generated significant environmental and economic impacts over the past decades. Shell’s activities across the Niger Delta have resulted in a plethora of environmental issues including several lawsuits. Pipeline vandalism, insecurity and vague regulations/policies have also prevented investors from investing in Nigeria’s deep and shallow reserves at a larger scale.

On Tuesday, the government says high development costs, complex project economics and uncertainty over fiscal terms have discouraged investors from committing the billions of dollars required to develop these fields.

Deep offshore projects are particularly capital-intensive because they require specialised vessels, drilling equipment, subsea infrastructure and advanced technology.

At the same time, oil companies have several investment options around the world and generally commit capital to projects where the fiscal and regulatory environment provides sufficient certainty over the long term.

The new framework is therefore intended to make Nigeria’s deep offshore projects more competitive and give investors clearer terms for making long-term investment decisions.

How much investment is Nigeria targeting and what is the tax incentive?

The federal government estimates that the new framework could unlock up to $50 billion in fresh deep offshore investments.

One of the major projects expected to benefit is the Bonga Southwest-Aparo development, which has an estimated investment requirement of about $10 billion.

The government expects the policy to help move such projects from prolonged delays to final investment decisions, construction and eventual production.

Projects that commence investment within the qualifying period, up to 31 December 2029, are expected to benefit from the incentives provided under the framework.

A review of the 13-page order document by the government indicated that the Nigerian government is offering investors a more favourable and clearer tax treatment to improve the economics of qualifying deep offshore projects.

The idea is to reduce the tax burden associated with developing these capital-intensive fields, thereby improving their expected returns and making them more attractive to investors.

For companies considering whether to commit billions of dollars to a project that could take years to develop and operate for decades, the certainty provided by a clearly defined fiscal framework can be as important as the size of the incentive itself.

The newly signed order has provided a distinctive framework for the government and prospective/eligible investors to operate in an atmosphere that is fair and beneficial to both parties.

What does Nigeria get in return?

The government says the policy is not simply about attracting foreign capital.

President Tinubu has emphasised that the new investments should also translate into tangible benefits for Nigerians.

The approved projects are expected to create employment for indigenous engineers, welders, technicians, marine workers and other professionals. Likewise, it is projected that local companies could benefit from opportunities in fabrication, marine services, logistics, engineering and other areas of the offshore supply chain.

Additionally, the Nigerian government wants more fabrication, equipment supply, technical services and training to take place locally rather than being outsourced entirely overseas.The projects are expected to provide opportunities for Nigerian workers to acquire specialised skills needed in the offshore oil and gas industry.

Authorities envisaged that increased demand from major offshore projects could help Nigerian businesses expand their capacity and participate in more sophisticated areas of the energy value chain.

Will the government policy translate into real impact for Nigerians?

One of the fundamental questions surrounding the government’s recent policy is: How will the government policy benefit an average Nigerian? Similarly, will the government lose money by granting tax incentives to IOCs?

Tax incentives mean the government may forgo some tax revenue that it would otherwise have collected from qualifying projects. The government’s argument is that without the incentives, some of these projects may not be developed at all.

It is believed that if the incentives succeed in attracting new investment, the government could eventually benefit through increased oil production, royalties, taxes from other parts of the economy, employment and wider economic activity.

The ultimate test, therefore, will be whether the economic benefits generated by the new investments outweigh the revenue forgone through the incentives.

Also, will the dividends of the investment reach grassroot communities? This is especially because decades of oil exploration in Nigeria’s oil-rich communities have robbed them of their livelihood due to persistent pollution from oil and gas fields.

What should Nigerians watch out for?

For many Nigerians, the success of the new policy may not be judged solely by the amount of investment announced but by the direct impact on Nigerians.

Key indicators will include, how environmentally friendly or sustainable are the activities of the approved project, how much of the projected $50 billion is actually committed, how many stalled projects move to Final Investment Decision, how much additional crude oil and gas the projects eventually produce, and how many Nigerian workers are employed.

Other critical concerns are how much project expenditure goes to Nigerian companies, how much equipment and infrastructure is produced or assembled in Nigeria. And whether Nigerian workers and companies are able to acquire capabilities that remain after the projects are completed.

READ ALSO: High taxation, insecurity, high interest rates top constraints facing Nigerian businesses – Survey

These concerns are critical, especially because groups of environmentalists across Nigeria are already criticizing the government move to resume exploration in the Niger Delta.

This is because the devastation caused by oil companies across the region has caused unprecedented levels of hardship, suffering and bitter memories for many families and communities. Remediation efforts and compensation oftentimes do not complement the damages caused.

Prospects

The new deep offshore incentive framework is essentially an attempt to solve two problems at once.

Nigeria’s bold move to unlock billions of dollars in investment that has remained on the sidelines because of the difficult economics and uncertainty surrounding some deep offshore developments has attracted global attention.

While the government wants to ensure that the resulting investments generate broader economic benefits for Nigerians, rather than simply increasing crude oil exports, a deliberate effort to scale up environmental protection regulations would boost confidence in Nigeria’s ambitious climate change targets as enshrined in its third series of Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC-3.0) submitted to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

Nonetheless, if the new deep offshore policy delivers as intended, Nigeria could see new offshore projects, increased oil production, more employment, stronger local businesses and greater technical capacity.

But the real measure of success will be what happens after the announcements: how much money is actually invested, how many projects are developed, how much oil is produced, how sustainable are the projects and how much of the resulting economic value remains in Nigeria.


Discover more from Premium Times Nigeria

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

African Alliance Secures Shareholders Nod to Raise N12bn, Eyes Return to Active Trading

info

Published

on

By

BY NKECHI NAECHE-ESEZOBOR—The board  of directors of African Alliance PLC on Wednesday got shareholders nod to raise N12 billion additional capital to shore up its baseline and meet National Insurance Commission, (NAICOM), Minimum capital requirement.

According to the details made available by the company under the approved resolutions, the Board is empowered to execute the capital injection through various channels, including private placement, rights issue, public offer, asset sales, or zero-coupon convertible subordinated debt notes.

The approval which was granted at the company’s Extra-ordinary general meeting held today in Lagos, shareholders also empower the board to determine conversion terms, allot shares, and revalidate legacy shares where necessary.

The EGM aligns with the Nigerian Insurance Industry Reform Act, 2025 (NIIRA), the Companies and Allied Matters Act, 2020 (CAMA 2020), the Investment and Securities Act, 2025, the Rule Book of the Nigerian Exchange Limited, and other regulations and directives of NAICOM.

Applauding the shareholders  for the approval, the Chairman of company, Anthony Isa, said “The approval granted by our shareholders today marks a vital milestone in securing the long-term strength and regulatory compliance of African Alliance Insurance Plc. By authorising the Board to raise up to N12 billion across flexible capital structures—including equity, debt notes, and asset optimisation—we are positioning the company to fully satisfy the recapitalisation requirements of the Nigerian Insurance Industry Reform Act while creating sustainable value for all stakeholders.

The board also got approval as part of and in furtherance of the company’s recapitalisation, approval “to sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of such properties or other assets of the company, whether or not constituting a major asset transaction, on such terms and conditions as may be approved by the board of directors, and permitted by applicable law, subject to the requisite regulatory approvals.”

In addition, the board  was also mandated  to amend the organisation’s Memorandum and Articles of Association (MEMART) “to the extent necessary or desirable to give effect to the recapitalisation, including any consequential increase in issued share capital and the allotment of shares pursuant thereto.”

Also, Managing Director/Chief Executive Officer Ayobami Ogunkeye, African Alliance Plc, assured shareholders that leadership is thoroughly vetting all potential equity partners in order to safeguard the firm’s foundational identity.

“We are extremely cautious about who we bring on board or align with, because this is a lasting commitment,” Ogunkeye stated. “Many parties have capital, but what drives them? Do they value what African Alliance represents, or are they simply after breaking it up for parts? We are rigorously vetting interested parties to make sure our goals match theirs.”

Ogunkeye disclosed that leadership is actively in talks with the Nigerian Exchange Limited (NGX) and other regulatory agencies to clear up longstanding filing gaps and open the door for the company’s shares to begin trading again.

“There is underlying worth here that matters greatly. We are actively in discussions with the regulators so trading in our stock can be reinstated on the exchange,” he noted. “At present, our share price sits well under its face value, but once this recapitalisation drive is finalised, we anticipate raising the share value to roughly 70 kobo or N1.00, restoring our position among stocks that are actively traded and hold real worth.”

The post African Alliance Secures Shareholders Nod to Raise N12bn, Eyes Return to Active Trading appeared first on Business Today NG.

Continue Reading

Business

NMDPRA approves 830,000-tonne petrol imports amid Dangote legal battle

info

Published

on

By

428683862 796449282514152 6787495153779598606 n e1733992153588.jpg

The Nigeria Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA) has approved petrol import permits covering about 830,000 metric tonnes for multiple companies ahead of the fourth quarter of 2026, PREMIUM TIMES has learnt.

George Ene-Ita, spokesperson for the authority, confirmed the development to PREMIUM TIMES on Tuesday.

“Yes, petrol import permits were approved for Q4 2026 to ensure there’re no supply gaps heading into the critical end-of-year period,” Mr Ene-Ita said.

Companies reportedly granted the permits include Matrix Energy, A.A. Rano, AYM Shafa, NIPCO, Pinnacle Oil and Bono Energy.

The approvals were reportedly issued on 18 September, although details of the individual allocations to the marketers were not immediately available as of the time of filing this report.

The latest approvals come amid an ongoing legal dispute between Dangote Petroleum Refinery and the regulator over the continued issuance of petrol import licences.

They also come as heightened tensions in the Middle East continue to disrupt global energy markets, keeping crude oil prices elevated and raising concerns about the cost of petroleum supplies.

Dangote’s legal challenge

In May, PREMIUM TIMES reported that Dangote Petroleum Refinery filed a fresh lawsuit against the Attorney-General of the Federation, challenging fuel import licences issued to oil marketers and the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC Ltd).

In the suit, the refinery argued that the licences granted to some marketers threatened its operations and were contrary to provisions of the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA).

The refinery contended that fuel import licences should only be issued when domestic supply is insufficient to meet national demand.

Nigeria has historically depended heavily on imported petrol, largely because of the poor performance of its state-owned refineries.

The $20 billion Dangote Refinery, owned by businessman Aliko Dangote, was expected to reduce the country’s dependence on imported refined petroleum products by supplying the domestic market.

With an installed capacity of 650,000 barrels per day, the facility is Africa’s largest single-train refinery and was projected to significantly reduce the foreign exchange burden associated with fuel imports.

However, petrol imports have continued as the refinery ramps up production and distribution, while some industry operators maintain that domestic output has yet to fully meet national demand.

Regulatory dispute

Since commencing operations in 2024, Dangote Refinery has repeatedly pushed for local marketers to source petroleum products from domestic refineries rather than rely on imports.

The former NMDPRA leadership under Farouk Ahmed resisted measures that it considered capable of creating a monopoly, arguing that allowing a single refinery to dominate the market could undermine competition and create risks for Nigeria’s energy security.

The disagreement contributed to a public dispute between Mr Dangote and Mr Ahmed.

Mr Dangote subsequently accused the former regulator of corruption and alleged that the NMDPRA was colluding with international traders and fuel importers to frustrate local refining by continuing to issue import licences.

He also raised questions about Mr Ahmed’s lifestyle and alleged that four of his children attended expensive secondary schools in Switzerland, claims that formed part of the broader controversy over the regulator’s conduct.

Mr Ahmed later resigned as NMDPRA chief executive.

Previous lawsuit

In 2024, Dangote Refinery instituted a separate suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1324/2024, seeking N100 billion in damages against the NMDPRA over the issuance of import licences to some marketers and the subsequent importation of petroleum products.

The marketers named in the suit included NNPC Ltd, Matrix Petroleum Services Limited, AYM Shafa Limited, A.A. Rano Limited, T. Time Petroleum Limited and 2015 Petroleum Limited.

In the suit dated 6 September 2024, the refinery’s lawyer, Ogwu Onoja, asked the Federal High Court to declare that the NMDPRA violated Sections 317(8) and (9) of the Petroleum Industry Act by issuing licences for the importation of petroleum products.

Dangote Refinery argued that such licences should only be issued where a shortfall in domestic petroleum supply exists.

The refinery also asked the court to declare that the NMDPRA failed in its statutory responsibility under the PIA to encourage domestic refining.

However, in a counter-affidavit dated 5 November 2024 and filed by Ahmed Raji (SAN), the marketers asked the court to dismiss the refinery’s claims.

They argued that competition was essential to the health of Nigeria’s economy and the viability of the petroleum sector, insisting that they were qualified to receive import licences under Section 317(9) of the PIA.

The defendants further accused Dangote Refinery of attempting to monopolise the petroleum industry by seeking sole control over fuel supply, distribution and pricing.

In July 2025, Dangote Refinery discontinued the lawsuit challenging the import approvals. The refinery did not publicly state its reasons for withdrawing the case.

Meanwhile, the Dangote Refinery’s current case challenging the continued issuance of petrol import licences is scheduled for further hearing on 7 October.

Asked on Tuesday for an update on the legal dispute with Dangote Refinery, Mr Ene-Ita declined to comment, citing the ongoing court proceedings.

“The Dangote case is still in court. I cannot say anything in a court case,” he said.

Continue Reading

Trending