Connect with us

News

Osaze Odemwingie Threatens Legal Action Against Popular British Broadcast Outfit Over His 2013 Botched Transfer Controversy

info

Published

on

IMG 20260906 WA0000.jpg

Former Super Eagles’ winger, Peter Osaze Odemwingie has threatened legal action against a popular British broadcast outift as well as two clubs in England’s football setting for ‘continuously mocking him’ over a botched transfer move that happened in 2013.

Sports247 reports that, though 13 years have passed since Osaze’s infamous attempt to force through a transfer from West Bromwich Albion to Queens Park Rangers, the ex-international, who is now a golfer, is angry that the incident is still being referenced by presenters.

Read Also: Award-winning Female Referee Folashade Ekun Earns Plaudits, After Graduating From Lagos State University

He accused the broadcast outfit, Sky Sports of ‘spreading untruths about the real events’ that played out on that inglorious date of January 31, 2013, the winter transfer deadline day, then slammed QPR for selling off a jersey on which his name had been already been branded by the club.

A report by UK’s Daily Mail revealed, “Peter Odemwingie has warned Sky Sports, West Bromwich Albion and Queens Park Rangers that he is considering legal action over his infamous failed transfer on deadline day in 2013.

“Odemwingie was at the centre of one of the most bizarre deadline day stories of all time when he was interviewed by reporters through his car window outside QPR’s Loftus Road stadium, believing he had completed a move to the London club.

“It later emerged that QPR and West Brom, Odemwingie’s club at the time, had failed to agree a transfer fee for the Nigerian striker and the proposed move collapsed just minutes before the 11pm deadline, thereby ultimately sending him back to The Baggies.

“Footage of his infamous interview did the rounds again on Sky Sports News ahead of (this past) Tuesday night’s deadline, prompting Odemwingie to launch an attack on the broadcaster in a video on Instagram.”

Sports247 gathered further that Osaze, now 45 years old, reacted to the development by accusing Sky Sports of not telling the full extent of the story and criticised QPR for auctioning an already branded jersey they had prepared for his arrival, in anticipation of a formal unveiling the next day.

Osaze posited in a video via Instagram, “Sky Sports agents and employees of both clubs – West Brom and QPR – definitely have questions to answer, and I will be seeing a lawyer next week to make it official.

“What is the motive, intention to show this episode on and on for so many years? The least will be lack or absence of respect in my opinion. Maybe they don’t like that I am half Nigerian and half Russian?

“I can only guess. Could be something else. Who really knows? The problem about this whole story is that nobody is interested in the truth. Sky Sports milked this situation for so many years. I think it’s just wickedness, really.”

Sports247 recalls that Osaze, who scored for Nigeria at the 2014 FIFA World Cup in Brazil, drove approximately 125 miles from West Brom’s training ground to QPR’s Loftus Road in London to force the deal through.

He believed a fee had already been agreed between both clubs and that his move depended only on a separate player transfer, but QPR did not have permission from West Brom to speak with him, so stadium security refused him entry.

Osaze, who was also a member of Nigeria’s silver-winning under-23 squad at Beijing 2008 Olympic Games, made two appearances for the Super Eagles at the 2010 FIFA World Cup in Soutth Africa and scored the team’s winning goal against Bosnia-Herzegovina at Brazil 2014.

Born in what is now Uzbekistan, Odemwingie began his career with AS Racines of Lagos, from where he moved to Bendel Insurance FC of Benin City, then onwards to La Louvière and Lille Metropole of France as well as Lokomotiv Moscow of Russia.

After falling out with West Brom, Osaze later moved to Cardiff City of Wales, Stoke City, Bristol City and Rotherham United of England as well as Madura United of Indonesia, where he announced his retirement on April 3rd, 2019.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Rivers Guber: ALDRAP writes INEC, seeks Chinda’s disqualification after Supreme Court judgment

info

Published

on

Kingsley Chinda.jpg

The Association of Legislative Drafting Practitioners, ALDRAP, has written to the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, seeking the disqualification of Kingsley Chinda as the All Progressives Congress, APC, governorship candidate in Rivers State for the 2027 election.

The request, conveyed in a letter dated September 26, 2027, and signed by Executive Secretary, Dr Tonye Clinton Jaja, flows from a suit pending before an Abuja Federal High Court in which ALDRAP is the plaintiff while INEC, Abdul Mahmud, APC, APC National Chairman, Chinda and Mariana Ajibola are listed as respondents.

In the suit numbered FHC/ABJ/CS/972/2026, ALDRAP asked the Abuja Federal High Court to disqualify Chinda and the APC candidates for the Rivers State House of Assembly election on the grounds that the APC Rivers State Governorship and House of Assembly Appeal Committee was populated by Chinda’s friends and colleagues, who are members of the House of Representatives in the National Assembly.

Reliefs sought by the plaintiff include a declaration that the appointment of Mahmud and Ajibola as chairmen of the APC Rivers State House of Assembly screening and appeal committees, respectively, despite their longstanding political and personal relationship with Chinda and persons aligned with Federal Capital Territory, FCT, minister, Nyesom Wike, constitutes bias and violation of the constitutional right to fair hearing as guaranteed under Section 36(1) of the 1999 Constitution.

Recommended

ALDRAP in the suit also asked the court for an order compelling the 5th respondent, Chinda, to appear before the court to testify on oath about his political and personal relationship with Mahmud and Ajibola, as well as an order nullifying and setting aside the entire screening exercise conducted by the respondents.

However, in its letter to INEC, ALDRAP asked the electoral commission to convene an out-of-court settlement meeting between parties in the suit towards the resolution of the issues in line with the implications of a recent Supreme Court judgment.

The Supreme Court of Nigeria had in a judgment on September 24, 2026, upheld INEC’s authority regarding provisions of the Electoral Act 2026.

A seven-member panel of the Supreme Court led by Justice Adamu Jauro set aside an earlier Court of Appeal decision and affirmed that sections 77(5) and 84 of the Electoral Act 2026 are constitutional and do not conflict with the 1999 Constitution. The case arose from a challenge by the Zenith Labour Party, ZLP, concerning INEC’s enforcement powers over political party membership registers and the conduct of primaries.

The Supreme Court, in its verdict, restored the position of the Federal High Court which affirmed INEC’s authority, while dismissing related appeals by the Social Democratic Party, SDP, and the Youth Party, YP.

The letter addressed to the Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission, read, “The Association of Legislative Drafting and Advocacy Practitioners (ALDRAP) respectfully writes concerning the consequential electoral issues arising from the judgment of the Supreme Court of Nigeria delivered on 24 September 2026, particularly in relation to the nomination of Hon. Kingsley Ogundu Chinda under the platform of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Rivers State.

“ALDRAP considers this matter especially important having regard to the fact that the Association had previously instituted proceedings before the Federal High Court, Abuja, in which INEC is the 1st Respondent, Hon. Abdul Mahmud is the 2nd Respondent and Hon.Kingsley Ogundu Chinda is the 5th Respondent, alongside the APC and other respondents.

“In that pending action, ALDRAP challenged, amongst other matters, the participation of Hon.Abdul Mahmud and Hon. Kingsley Chinda in the APC Rivers State screening process on the ground that their alleged political, professional and personal relationships created a reasonable apprehension of bias and compromised the independence and impartiality of the screening exercise.

“The action was brought pursuant to the constitutional right to fair hearing guaranteed under Section 36 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended). The subsequent judgment of the Supreme Court delivered on 24 September 2026, restoring the statutory provisions governing political party membership registers and the nomination of candidates, has further brought into sharp focus the legal and electoral consequences surrounding the APC Rivers State governorship candidature.

“In the circumstances, ALDRAP respectfully requests the Chairman of INEC to convene an urgent meeting with the Association and the relevant representatives of the APC and Hon. Kingsley Chinda, with a view to achieving an out-of-court settlement and lawful administrative resolution of the issues arising from the pending proceedings and the Supreme Court judgment.

“The proposed engagement is not intended to invite INEC to disregard or undermine the judgment of the Supreme Court. Rather, ALDRAP seeks to facilitate a lawful resolution of the consequential issues, including the status of the APC governorship nomination, the applicable membership-register requirements, the records submitted to INEC by the APC, and the appropriate steps required to give effect to the Supreme Court’s decision.

“ALDRAP believes that an early resolution through constructive engagement, where legally permissible, would avoid unnecessary multiplicity of proceedings and assist INEC in maintaining certainty, transparency and compliance with the Constitution and applicable electoral legislation.

“We therefore respectfully request that the Commission urgently convene a consultative meeting with ALDRAP and the affected stakeholders for the purpose of exploring an appropriate out-of-court resolution and determining the consequential administrative steps arising from the Supreme Court judgment.”

Continue Reading

News

Gunmen kill five miners, injure two others in Plateau

info

Published

on

IMG 3815 2.jpeg

Gunmen on Saturday reportedly attacked a mining site in Marit village, Barkin Ladi Local Government Area of Plateau State, killing five miners and injuring two others.

The attack reportedly occurred during the miners’ activities at the site, according to a statement on Saturday by Rwang Tengwong, the spokesman for Berom Youth Moulders-Association.

The group condemned the deadly attack on a mining site, stating that the attack left the community grieving and living in fear.

Mr Tengwong said the group is deeply concerned that law-abiding citizens in vulnerable communities and rural areas continue to face deadly attacks, despite repeated calls for stronger security.

He urged security agencies to go beyond expressing concern by identifying, arresting and prosecuting anyone responsible for these attacks.

“Such measures are necessary to prevent further loss of life and restore residents’ confidence in their safety.

“This must not be reduced to another statistic as authorities must act decisively to protect communities and ensure that those responsible are brought to justice,” he said.

Alabo Alfred, the state police spokesman, was not available for comment. Text messages sent to him remained unanswered as of press time.

Peoples Gazette had reported on June 16 that five miners were killed at a mining site in Gero village, Gyel district of Jos South area of the state.

Continue Reading

Trending