Connect with us

Business

FULL LIST: NIIRA 2025: NAICOM Eyes Liquidation for Non-Compliant Operators

info

Published

on

BY NKECHI NAECHE-ESEZOBOR—The National Insurance Commission,((NAICOM),  on Monday said only eight insurance companies are yet to be verified by the commission.

The commission disclosed this today while releasing the 43 insurance firms that met the new minimum capital requirements set up by NIIRA

According to NAICOM “The eight insurance companies submitted evidence of compliance shortly before the statutory deadline are currently undergoing final verification and regulatory review.

This, the commission said would be concluded within fourteen days.

Insurance companies not listed among the 43 verified firms include those currently undergoing final regulatory review, as well as unverified operators at risk of liquidation—such as NICON Insurance Plc; Goldlink Insurance Plc Nigerian Reinsurance; Nigerian Agricultural Insurance Corporation ; Royal Exchange Prudential Life Plc;  Tangerine Life Insurance Limited; Sovereign Trust Insurance Plc; African Alliance Insurance Plc; Guinea Insurance Plc; Regency Alliance Insurance Plc; Staco Insurance Plc; Alliance & General Insurance; Universal Insurance Plc; emPle General Insurance Company Nigeria Limited and emPle Life Assurance Limited.

NAICOM had announced the successful completion of the twelve-month insurance sector recapitalization exercise undertaken pursuant to Section 15 and other relevant provisions of the Nigerian Insurance Industry Reform Act (NIIRA) 2025, signed into law on 31 July 2025 by His Excellency, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, as part of his administration’s financial sector transformation agenda towards the attainment of a US$1 trillion economy by 2030.

The successful conclusion of the exercise marks a defining milestone in the transformation of Nigeria’s insurance industry and signals the beginning of a new era for insurance in the country.

Following the enactment of NIIRA 2025, the Commission commenced a structured implementation process to provide strategic oversight, ensure transparency, support operators throughout the transition, and facilitate the effective implementation of the new minimum capital requirements within the statutory compliance period.

To ensure an orderly, transparent, credible, and verifiable process, the Commission issued the Guidelines on the Implementation of Minimum Capital Requirements (MCR) for Insurance and Reinsurance Companies in Nigeria.

The Guidelines provided detailed guidance on the statutory minimum capital requirements under NIIRA 2025, eligible and ineligible capital instruments, admissible and non-admissible assets, verification and validation procedures, regulatory timelines, reporting obligations, and supervisory expectations throughout the implementation period.

The post FULL LIST: NIIRA 2025: NAICOM Eyes Liquidation for Non-Compliant Operators appeared first on Business Today NG.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

CPPE warns against return to petrol subsidy, proposes targeted relief

info

Published

on

By

468939862 570688608903404 8583644854384931658 n.jpg

MTN ADVERT

The Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise (CPPE) has cautioned against restoring the petrol subsidy, describing the policy as fiscally unsustainable despite the severe economic pressures caused by rising petrol prices.

The private-sector advocacy group, in a policy brief signed by its Chief Executive Officer, Muda Yusuf, on Sunday, said the recent escalation in petrol prices had increased transportation, logistics and production costs, weakening consumers’ purchasing power.

It added that the recent increase in fuel prices also worsened the competitiveness challenges confronting businesses, particularly micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs).

CPPE’s position comes amid renewed calls for a return to fuel subsidy, including a pledge by former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar to restore a targeted petrol subsidy if elected in 2027.

The organisation said the subsidy debate should not be reduced to the issue of pump prices, arguing that it has wider implications for Nigeria’s fiscal sustainability, foreign exchange stability, investment, domestic refining, industrialisation, employment and energy security.

PT WHATSAPP CHANNEL

“The central policy question is therefore not whether Nigeria should return to the old subsidy regime, but how to preserve the gains of the reform while reducing its social costs and translating the resulting fiscal space into tangible improvements in citizens’ welfare,” CPPE said.

Subsidy regime

According to the think tank, Nigeria previously spent an estimated $10 billion to $15 billion annually on petroleum-product imports before the subsidy reform.

It said subsidy and under-recovery obligations also consumed significant public resources, constrained remittances to the Federation Account and intensified fiscal pressures.

CPPE said artificially low domestic petrol prices also encouraged arbitrage and cross-border diversion, effectively resulting in Nigerian public resources subsidising fuel consumption outside the country.

“The old regime was therefore not merely a subsidy problem; it was a major fiscal, foreign-exchange and resource-allocation problem,” the think tank said.

Domestic refining

The group said the shift to market-based petrol pricing had improved the commercial viability of domestic refining by creating stronger investment incentives in the sector.

The think tank argued that a competitive domestic refining industry would generate opportunities beyond petrol production, including in diesel, aviation fuel, petrochemicals, fertiliser, plastics, chemicals, logistics, storage and maritime services.

“Domestic refining also conserves foreign exchange through import substitution, creates export opportunities and retains refining, engineering, logistics and technical jobs within the Nigerian economy,” CPPE said.

It urged Nigeria to pursue the transition from dependence on imported petroleum products to becoming “a competitive regional refining and petrochemical hub.”

CPPE acknowledged that subsidy removal had increased revenues available to the federal, state and local governments but said higher government revenues alone could not justify the reform.

“Citizens must see tangible benefits through improved public transportation, electricity, healthcare, education, food security, infrastructure and social protection,” it said.

The organisation said the debate should now focus increasingly on fiscal accountability and the quality of government spending.

It called on the three tiers of government to transparently demonstrate how the additional resources arising from the reform were being used to improve economic and social outcomes.

Global oil shock

The group also stressed the need to distinguish the price increase associated with subsidy removal from more recent increases attributed to movements in global crude oil and refined-product prices.

According to CPPE, petrol was selling at about N774 to N800 per litre before the latest escalation in international energy prices, while prices subsequently rose above N1,300 per litre amid what it described as a sharp increase in global energy prices linked to the Middle East crisis.

“It would therefore be incorrect to attribute the entirety of the latest petrol-price increase to subsidy removal,” the organisation said.

The think tank described the two developments as separate issues requiring different policy responses: the first, a domestic structural reform involving the transition to market-based pricing, and the second, an external commodity price shock.

N20 trillion subsidy bill

CPPE said restoring a universal petrol subsidy could recreate the fiscal and foreign-exchange pressures that prompted the reform.

Using an estimated petrol consumption benchmark of 50 million litres per day and an indicative subsidy requirement of N1,050 per litre, the organisation estimated that the potential subsidy exposure could amount to about ₦ 152.5 billion daily, N1.575 trillion monthly, and approximately N19.16 trillion annually.

It described the figure as an annual burden of about N20 trillion, while acknowledging that the actual cost would depend on factors including consumption, crude oil prices, exchange rates, refining or landing costs, and the regulated pump price.

CPPE also warned that consumption could increase under a subsidy regime as price differentials could recreate incentives for cross-border diversion.

“An annual subsidy bill approaching N20 trillion would impose an enormous opportunity cost,” it said.

According to the organisation, such spending could compete with funding for infrastructure, education, healthcare, security, agriculture and social protection, while potentially widening the fiscal deficit and increasing borrowing and debt-service pressures.

It further warned that increased government borrowing could crowd out private-sector credit, sustain high interest rates and weaken investment, productivity, job creation and economic growth.

“Nigeria would therefore risk replacing an energy-price problem with a much larger fiscal, debt, foreign-exchange and investment problem,” CPPE said.

Targeted relief

Rather than restoring the the petrol subsidy, the organisation urged the government to implement targeted interventions to reduce household vulnerability and business costs.

It recommended expanding affordable public transportation, rail freight, and logistics infrastructure; improving electricity supply; accelerating compressed natural gas (CNG), solar, and distributed energy solutions; and strengthening food production through improved agricultural security, irrigation, rural infrastructure, and logistics.

CPPE also called for targeted support for vulnerable households, improved public healthcare and education, and measures to reduce energy, logistics and financing costs for productive enterprises, particularly MSMEs.

READ ALSO: CPPE urges NMDPRA to tie petrol imports to verified supply gaps

It urged the government to maintain a predictable, market-oriented framework for the downstream petroleum sector to protect investor confidence and encourage further investment in domestic refining.

“The appropriate policy direction is to preserve the downstream petroleum reforms while aggressively mitigating their social and economic costs,” the organisation said.

CPPE said the fiscal gains from subsidy removal must become more visible through infrastructure, public services and productive investment, alongside greater transparency and accountability in the utilisation of additional revenues accruing to the federal, state and local governments.

“The subsidy debate should therefore move beyond the binary question of whether petrol subsidy should be restored.

“The more consequential issue is how Nigeria can convert the gains of the reform into lower structural costs, stronger domestic production, improved competitiveness, greater energy security and measurable improvements in citizens’ welfare,” it said.

The organisation said the recommendations would make the reform “economically sustainable and socially defensible.”

Nigeria’s petrol subsidy was removed in May 2023 after President Bola Tinubu announced during his inauguration on 29 May that “the fuel subsidy is gone.”

The announcement effectively ended the government’s previous system of subsidising petrol costs, prompting the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC Ltd) to adjust pump prices nationwide in June 2023.

The reform was intended to reduce the government’s financial burden from subsidising petrol.


Discover more from Premium Times Nigeria

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Business

FG settles severance benefits for 2,100 former Nigeria Airways workers after two decades

info

Published

on

By

033A2481.jpg

MTN ADVERT

The Federal Government has paid outstanding severance benefits to 2,100 former workers of the defunct Nigeria Airways, more than two decades after the national carrier was liquidated.

The payment covers beneficiaries in Batches 1 to 7, according to a statement issued by the Federal Ministry of Finance on Friday.

Another 600 former workers in Batches 8 and 9 are being processed for payment and are expected to receive their benefits within days, bringing the total number of beneficiaries under the exercise to 2,700.

The ministry said the benefits across the nine batches amount to N18 billion.

Nigeria Airways, which was established in 1958 as the country’s national carrier, ceased operations in 2003 and was liquidated in 2004. Many former workers subsequently spent years pursuing unpaid terminal and severance benefits.

PT WHATSAPP CHANNEL

The latest payment follows years of demands by former workers and interventions by the National Assembly and successive administrations over the outstanding liabilities.

In January 2025, the National Assembly Joint Committee on Aviation said the Federal Government owed former Nigeria Airways workers N36 billion and threatened to withhold approval of the aviation budget unless provisions were made for the payment.

How the payment was made

The Ministry of Finance said President Bola Tinubu had earlier approved the settlement of the outstanding severance obligations and directed that the matter be concluded.

Under the direction of the Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, Taiwo Oyedele, the ministry said processes were undertaken to identify eligible beneficiaries, validate records and establish the financial obligations before payments commenced.

Mr Oyedele said the payment was part of the government’s effort to address legitimate outstanding obligations.

“Behind these figures are people and families who have waited for years to receive what is legitimately due to them,” he said.

“Our responsibility is to confront outstanding obligations, complete the necessary processes and, once the resources are secured, ensure that the people affected feel the impact of government positively.”

He said the exercise demonstrated what could be achieved when government institutions worked together to resolve longstanding issues.

READ ALSO: NASS panel threatens to withhold aviation budget until Ex-Nigerian Airways workers are paid

The ministry also acknowledged the involvement of the Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, Mr Festus Keyamo, and the National Assembly Joint Committees on Aviation in efforts to resolve the matter.

The ministry said the objective was to ensure that legitimate beneficiaries received their approved entitlements while maintaining safeguards around public funds.


Discover more from Premium Times Nigeria

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Trending