Connect with us

Entertainment

Jeremiah Gyang Advocates for Fair Compensation for Gospel and Secular Artists in Exclusive Interview

editor

Published

on

Jeremiah Gyang www.mathewtegha

Renowned Nigerian singer-songwriter, instrumentalist, and record producer, Jeremiah Gyang, has expressed his support for artists, both in the secular and gospel music genres, who charge fees for performing at churches and selling tickets for their concerts.

In an exclusive interview with Matthewtegha Blog, Gyang, widely recognized as one of Nigeria’s most versatile artists, shared his perspective on the moral acceptability of gospel musicians requesting payment for their performances. He emphasized that there is nothing ethically wrong with this practice.

Gyang firmly defended musicians in the Christian space, asserting that they should not face criticism for setting gate fees for their concerts. He passionately stated, “He that labors to plow should not be stifled, so if artists are holding concerts and charging fees, the audience should be willing to pay. It doesn’t matter whether the music is gospel or secular; if there’s a ticket price, it should be respected. If you appreciate their work, pay the fee. If you don’t, then abstain from paying, but complaining about it is a sign of disrespect for the hard work of these artists.”

Jeremiah Gyang Www.mathewtegha (2)

The multitalented artist explained that organizing concerts involves substantial financial investment. He pointed out, “Some may argue that it’s all about money, but one must understand that hosting concerts requires funding. You can’t approach a venue owner and expect to use their facility for free while expecting blessings, just as you can’t ask an instrument seller to provide instruments without payment.”

Drawing from personal experiences, Gyang revealed the hardships he faced in the past while working with his band, emphasizing that similar challenges led to the disbandment of his group. He said, “I’ve been in situations where I had to tell my band that we should proceed with a performance and rely on divine blessings, only to end up going home hungry. This has resulted in the dissolution of my band several times, sometimes leaving me as a one-man band. People have high expectations when they associate my name with a performance.”

Jeremiah Gyang said he believes that fair compensation for labor is an essential principle. He argued that there is no distinction between gospel and secular musicians in the Bible and that anyone who works in the music industry deserves to be paid for their efforts. He further noted, “Even musicians who serve in churches and perform on pulpits should receive compensation, as it is a fair practice. When audiences enjoy the music but refuse to pay, they indirectly disrespect the musicians and, in a way, disrespect the prophets.”

To support his viewpoint, Gyang referenced Nehemiah 12:46 and 47 from the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible, highlighting the biblical order that he believes is missing in many churches today. He asserted that both musicians and ushers should be supported financially by the church to prevent misbehavior and misconduct, and if any issues arise, the church bears the responsibility.

In addition, Gyang cited Nehemiah 13:10, emphasizing that the daily sustenance of musicians should come from tithes and offerings. He argued that today’s gospel musicians should be compensated using these resources.

Addressing the theme of his music and his connection with the audience, Jeremiah Gyang explained, “I have two distinct audiences: those who appreciate my message and those who enjoy my music. To connect with the music enthusiasts, I emphasize the artistic beauty of my work. However, for those who engage with my message, my focus has been on repentance, return, and rising because my music’s purpose is to contribute to nation-building and encourage people to return to God, as only He can save us, given the limitations of the government. I also perceive a fundamental issue within the Christian Church, where it appears they are not effectively guiding people back to God but are becoming more focused on industry service.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Dua Lipa Sues Samsung for £11 Million Over Alleged Unauthorized Use of Her Image

info

Published

on

By

IMG 7862.webp

Dua Lipa has reportedly filed a lawsuit against Samsung, seeking £11 million in damages over claims that the tech giant used her image without permission to promote its products.

According to court documents filed in the Central District of California, the Grammy-winning singer alleges that her photograph was used on the packaging of Samsung’s Crystal 43-inch ultra-high-definition televisions, which were marketed alongside the XITE Hits music channel.

The image in question was reportedly taken backstage at a 2024 music festival and later appeared on a large number of television boxes sold across the United States.

Dua Lipa’s legal team claims the use of her image created a false impression that she had endorsed or partnered with Samsung, potentially influencing consumers to purchase the televisions based on that perceived association.

Her lawyer, Christine Lepera, was cited as stating that Samsung used a copyrighted image of the singer “without authority or licence” and prominently featured it on retail packaging.

The lawsuit further alleges that Samsung ignored multiple legal warnings issued by the singer’s representatives before the case was formally filed.

The filing also included references to social media reactions, with some users reportedly saying they were drawn to or influenced to purchase the televisions because of Dua Lipa’s image on the packaging.

Dua Lipa, who has previously worked with global brands such as Nespresso, Puma, Porsche, and Yves Saint Laurent Beauty, is described in the filing as being highly selective about endorsement deals and would not have automatically agreed to such a partnership.

She is seeking at least $15 million in damages, though the final amount could reportedly increase if the case proceeds to trial.

At the time of the report, Samsung had not issued a public response to the lawsuit.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

AI-generated actors and scripts are now ineligible for Oscars

info

Published

on

By

GettyImages 2266014829.jpg

The organization behind the Academy Awards released new Oscar rules on Friday, including several that address the use of generative artificial intelligence.

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences said that only performances “credited in the film’s legal billing and demonstrably performed by humans with their consent” will be eligible for Academy Awards. Similarly, the academy said that screenplays must be “human-authored” to be eligible.

The academy also said it has the right to request more information about a film’s AI usage and “human authorship.”

These rule changes come as an independent film is in the works with an AI-generated version of Val Kilmer, as AI “actress” Tilly Norwood keeps making headlines, and as new video models are causing at least a few filmmakers to make sweeping declarations of despair. AI was also one of the main sticking points in the actors’ and writers’ strikes back in 2023.

Outside Hollywood, at least one novel has been pulled by its publisher due to the apparent use of AI, and other writers’ groups are declaring that AI usage makes work ineligible for awards.

Continue Reading

Trending