Connect with us

News

Our Project Remains Valid & Cannot Be Re-Awarded – Bleneson Service replies Plateau Govt.

editor

Published

on

Lalong legac

The controversy around the Lalong Legacy Project has generated more reactions between the contractor, Beleneson Services Nig Ltd and the Plateau State Government. The latest is coming from the Managing director of Bleneson Nigerian Limited, Engr Lawson Ngoa, who has stated that he has raised valid issues of which the Plateau State Government has not come out to deny any.

Contractors of the Lalong Legacy Project, Bleneson Services Nig Ltd, have called the alleged accusation of misleading the state and the proposed takeover of the Lalong Legacy Project site by the Plateau State Government an act of intimidation and a show of state might. Emphasizing that a 70% completed project can’t be terminated on the grounds of non-performance.

According to the Managing Director services of Bleneson Services Nig LTD, Engr Lawson Ngoa the State Government is being minimal with the truth by withholding valuable information and painting their request for an Order of Injunction from the court as an afterthought, giving misleading fabrications to the people of the State.

The Statement Reads:

OUR PROJECT REMAINS VALID AND CANNOT BE RE-AWARDED: BLENESON SERVICES NIG LTD (CONTRACTOR FOR LALONG LEGACY PROJECT)

  1. The State Government said the facts alleged by me are misleading, which of those facts are misleading? Is it that it’s executive council did not sit in order to attempt to re-award the said contract? Or that there is no pending litigation on the subject matter (the off shoot of which even the subcontractors have instituted a suit because they have been instigated to think that the company has been paid, when the government that has refused to pay the company)? or is it that the governor has never confirmed by himself by stating that ‘70%-80% of the job has been completed’? or is it that with the actions of the govt there won’t be more litigation? Or can the State Government show any genuine prove that it has paid money on the project to an account, either personal or the company’s for this project?
  2. The State Government is being minimal with the truth by withholding valuable information and giving misleading fabrications to the people of the State. The appointment of an independent valuer is not part of the agreement entered into by parties. Even the several valuations carried out by the Project Monitoring Committee (PMC) jointly instituted by the parties were not honoured by the state government. How could I have known that the State Government wanted to or had appointed an independent valuer when I was not informed about their intention to do so? Did the State Government embark on this valuation through its purported independent valuers so it can pay the company its outstanding? Well, if that was the intent of the State Government for unilaterally appointing the valuers, they did not send invitation to the company for any reconciliation of accounts and neither have they paid me or the company anything, regardless of it said completed valuation.
  3. It is obvious that the State Government wants to disregard the rule of law on a subject matter that is before the court, we call on the Federal Government, the Judiciary and every well-meaning Nigerian to see how the Plateau State Government is muddling up and destroying the livelihood of the contractor and subcontractors, who are now heavily indebted as a result of the government’s refusal to offset it’s accrued debts on this project for the past one year. This only empathically shows that the State Government terminated the contract using state might.
  4. As to the allegation that we moved out of the state and all that was purported by the government, we have facts to contravene this distortion, because our offices in the State are still in existence and our staff are always around, particularly the office in the State Capital Jos, so how could we have been said to move out. Of course, as a result of the looting from us during and after the covid-19, and to prevent our machinery from wear and tear that would have occasioned as a result of the hostility of the government towards our staff by refusing them access to the sites, we had to remove valuable equipment to safe locations, with the anticipation that we will resume work as soon as issues are resolved or the court grants our reliefs.
  5. The people of Plateau State should know that due to the State Government’s refusal to pay us, we had sought all means of amicable resolution, but to our dismay the State Government dragged us to the Tax Appeal Tribunal before this termination letter that was sent to us. I was in Jos for several days reaching out to have a roundtable discussion with the Governor and relevant stakeholders to the project so issues can be ironed out amicably, and yet the Government said I kept mute and didn’t approach them!

Seeing the body language, and because of the urgency of the situation as this had become an emergency, we immediately followed suit by doing all that is required by law and filed a case to that effect before the State High Court to restrain them amongst other things before the expiration of the 30days notice. This are facts verifiable in the public domain. So, how can our going to the court to seek redress be an afterthought? There was no such thing as consent by conduct on our part as we didn’t sleep on our rights, so this is not a situation of laches and acquiescence.

  1. I will not dabble into that as a matter of respect to the court, we have strong faith in the judiciary, and we believe that justice shall be done. However, the issue of damages that the State Government is hammering on, in the case of this Lalong Legacy Project damages has not yet arisen. The issue of damages can only come up if and when the contract has been rightly terminated. This is what we are contending, that the termination is invalid, as we have not bridged any terms of the contract, neither have we refused to continue with the project nor has any of our act or omission brought the lifespan of the contract to an end, simple.

Seeking redress is a post contract issue which does not apply in the instant case. May be if the courts adjudge the contract as terminated, then we can talk of a redress for damages.

I urge the subcontractors to resist all attempts to be instigated further by the State machinery against the contractor. They should be the reassured of the contractor’s commitment in defending the Project as they ensure that nothing happens to the respective work the contractor allocated to them.

Thank you.

Engr Lawson Ngoa

Managing Director, Bleneson Services Nigeria Ltd

3rd November, 2022

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Warriors Send Early Warning! Abia Crush Rivers Alphas 41-0 As Bello Stars In SHOWTIME Season XV

info

Published

on

By

WhatsApp Image 2026 09 20 at 5.29.03 PM.jpeg

Abia Warriors delivered the first major statement of SHOWTIME Flag Football League Season XV, producing a dominant 41-0 victory over Rivers Alphas at Showtime Arena to begin their new campaign emphatically.

READ ALSO: Panthers Strike First! Daniel Davies Shines As SHOWTIME Season XV Bursts Into Life | Sports247 Nigeria

Quarterback Bello Anuoluwapo led the individual ratings with an impressive 8.1, while receiver Success Patrick followed closely at 8.0. Joseph Williams, another key figure in the Warriors’ offence, earned a 7.3 rating as Abia controlled the contest on both sides of the ball and prevented Rivers from scoring.

The Warriors led 20-0 at halftime before continuing their dominance after the break. Williams connected with Success Patrick for a touchdown and later found Jumai A.O., while Bello also delivered touchdown passes to Jumai as Abia’s multiple attacking options proved difficult for Rivers to contain. The Warriors’ defence was equally influential, forcing turnovers and maintaining the shutout.

The performance immediately puts the spotlight on Abia’s determination to challenge again after their championship reign was ended by Lagos Knights in the Season XIV final. More importantly, it demonstrated the quality of individual talent that SHOWTIME is putting before fans and potential commercial partners every Game Week.

With the league’s digital platform now documenting player ratings, match statistics and play-by-play action, stars such as Bello, Success and Williams have measurable performances that can be followed throughout the season. That creates stronger personalities around the competition and gives brands new opportunities to associate with players, weekly awards, statistics, highlights and digital content.

For sponsors, a result like this is more than a scoreline. It produces athletes and stories capable of driving conversations throughout the week, while SHOWTIME’s growing digital ecosystem allows those performances to live beyond the stadium.

With ₦60 million in Season XV rewards and the journey towards SHOWTIME Bowl XV only beginning, the Warriors have wasted little time announcing themselves.

41 points scored. Zero conceded. A commanding opening victory.

Abia Warriors are back — and Season XV already has another major storyline.

Continue Reading

Business

EXCLUSIVE: Chinese business partners battle over control of Nigerian company

info

Published

on

By

Screenshot 2026 09 20 143929.png

A bitter corporate battle between Chinese business partners over the control of Crown Ceramics Nigeria Limited has escalated into a maze of court cases, petitions and regulatory interventions, exposing one of the most contentious shareholder disputes involving a foreign-owned manufacturing company in Nigeria.

Court documents and petitions obtained by PREMIUM TIMES show that the dispute, which has dragged through courts in Abeokuta, Lagos and Abuja, has also reached the Nigeria Police Force, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) and the Office of the Vice President.

At the centre of the dispute are majority shareholders who collectively own 65 per cent of the company and a minority shareholder, Chen Dongfeng, who they say holds about eight per cent equity but has allegedly assumed effective control of the business.

The majority shareholders allege that since March 2025 they have been denied access to the company’s factory, financial records, bank accounts and corporate decision-making despite remaining the controlling shareholders.

They claim repeated requests to inspect company accounts, review operational reports, hold board meetings, conduct audits and receive profit distributions were ignored or obstructed.

According to the documents, the shareholders also allege they have been prevented from participating in the management of the company while Mr Dongfeng allegedly exercises exclusive control over the company’s finances, banking arrangements, factory operations and corporate records.

PT WHATSAPP CHANNEL
Dangote Refinery AD

Mr Dongfeng is the Managing Director of Crown Ceramics.

Court battles across three cities

The dispute first reached the Federal High Court in Abeokuta in 2025 when the majority shareholders — Zhang Kefeng, Zhang Linshuang, Liu Zhengyu and Liao Yuzhen — filed Suit No. FHC/AB/CS/64/2025 after alleging that Mr Dongfeng had taken physical control of the company despite being a minority shareholder.

Among other reliefs, they sought orders preventing banks from honouring transactions initiated by him after the company’s board passed a resolution directing financial institutions to deny him access to company funds.

While that case was pending, Mr Dongfeng instituted another suit in Lagos involving substantially similar issues regarding the management and control of the company .

Aliyu & Musa (SAN), the law firm engaged by the majority shareholders to handle the matter, initially advised an internal resolution through a board meeting. The company then convened a board meeting aimed at resolving the dispute internally, including consideration of Mr Dongfeng’s removal as a director.

It is not immediately clear whether the meeting proceeded but a court action was filed in Abeokuta seeking to restrain the board from removing Mr Dongfeng.

Documents seen by PREMIUM TIMES show that Mr Dongfeng asked the court to invalidate a meeting purportedly held on 1 March 2025, arguing that he was not served the statutory notice required by law.

In the counterclaim filed before the Federal High Court in Abeokuta, Mr Dongfeng asked the court to declare that, as a recognised member and director of the Company, he was legally entitled to receive notice of all general and board meetings of the company.

He also asked the court to declare that the alleged failure or refusal to serve him notice of the 1 March 2025 meeting violated Sections 243 and 245 of the Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA) 2020, as amended.

According to him, the statutory notice should include the date, venue and agenda of the meeting, as well as all documents required to be circulated to persons entitled to attend.

Similarly, Mr Dongfeng is asking the court to set aside and declare invalid the meeting held on 1 March 2025 on the grounds that it was convened and conducted without proper statutory notice. He is also asking the court to nullify all resolutions purportedly reached at the meeting.

In addition, he is seeking a perpetual injunction restraining the majority shareholders, their agents, representatives or anyone acting on their behalf from implementing, relying on or taking any steps pursuant to the resolutions allegedly passed at the meeting.

Mr Dongfeng wants the court to further restrain the majority shareholders from issuing or relying on notices for future board or general meetings of the first plaintiff unless such notices are properly served on him in compliance with CAMA 2020.

Meanwhile, the majority shareholders maintain that despite the various court proceedings, no court has issued an order expressly preventing them from accessing the company or participating in its management.

In April 2026, the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, granted an interim order restraining anyone from preventing them from accessing the company’s premises and directed the Inspector-General of Police to provide adequate security to facilitate compliance with the order.

The Police Directorate of Legal Services subsequently recommended that the Ogun State Commissioner of Police provide officers to implement the court order.

Despite these developments, the majority shareholders insist they remain excluded from effective control of the company. Their lawyer, Sanusi Musa, told PREMIUM TIMES that some police officers are “conniving with the minority shareholder to prevent the majority shareholders from accessing the factory. The presence of police is stopping them from accessing the facility.”

Mr Musa added that the Vice President, Kashim Shettima, in his capacity as Chairman of the Presidential Enabling Business Environment Council (PEBEC), has directed the police to intervene in the matter and yet that directive has not been adhered to.

“The majority shareholders are helpless as of now,” Mr Musa said.

Meanwhile, Emeka Ekweozor, the lawyer to Mr Dongfeng, told PREMIUM TIMES that the matters in controversy are “sub judice, and it would be wholly inappropriate for parties to seek, through the media, to achieve what ought properly to be determined by the Court.”

Alleged N40 billion diversion

The dispute has since taken a criminal dimension.

In a petition submitted to the EFCC on 10 July, the majority shareholders accused Mr Dongfeng and several others of diversion and misappropriation of company funds, fraudulent transactions, concealment of corporate records and related economic crimes.

The petition alleges that approximately N40 billion may have been diverted, withdrawn, transferred or otherwise misappropriated since March 2025.

According to the petition, the alleged transactions include diversion of company sales revenue to personal accounts or related companies, payments under suspected fictitious procurement arrangements, inflated labour costs, unsupported invoices, questionable reimbursements, substantial cash withdrawals without documented corporate approval and undisclosed cross-border transfers.

The petition further alleges that company bank statements, financial reports, inventory records and sales records have been withheld from the majority shareholders despite repeated requests.

The shareholders also claim they have received no dividend or profit distribution even though the company has continued operations.

They urged the EFCC to investigate the allegations, obtain and analyse the company’s financial records, trace banking transactions and recover any funds found to have been unlawfully diverted.

PREMIUM TIMES could not independently verify the allegations against Mr Dongfeng and his lawyers have vehemently denied all the allegations.

Mr Ekweozor, said his “Client categorically denies all allegations of diversion, misappropriation, fraudulent transactions, concealment of corporate records, or any other economic offences alleged against him. The allegations are false, unsubstantiated and are expressly denied.”

Allegations involving company employees

The dispute also extends to several company employees.

In a separate petition to the Inspector-General of Police, the company alleged that five employees unlawfully interfered with the management of Crown Ceramics Nigeria Limited by obstructing directors from carrying out their responsibilities and encouraging other workers to frustrate the company’s leadership.

The petition further alleges that the employees prevented officials of the Corporate Affairs Commission from entering the company’s premises during an investigation initiated following directives from the Office of the Vice President.

The petition asked the police to investigate, apprehend and prosecute the employees for their alleged actions.

Appeal to the Vice President

The majority shareholders also sought intervention from Vice President Kashim Shettima in his capacity as Chairman of the Presidential Enabling Business Environment Council (PEBEC).

In their petition, they alleged that Mr Dongfeng illegally stripped company assets, committed fraud, forged corporate documents and unlawfully pledged the company’s assets as collateral for loans obtained for another company without the knowledge or consent of the majority shareholders.

They further alleged that company assets, including landed property, production lines and machinery, were used to secure loans running into tens of billions of naira and that corporate ownership records were altered without authorisation.

ALSO READ: Nigerian company says it’s unable to reach majority shareholder

The petition also claimed that the majority shareholders had effectively lost access to a company into which they had collectively invested more than $25 million.

According to the petition, some of the investors returned to China after allegedly being prevented from accessing the company and participating in board meetings.

The shareholders appealed for government intervention to guarantee their safety, restore access to the company, facilitate investigations by relevant authorities and enable them to resume management of the business.

In his reaction, Mr Ekweozor said all these allegations against his “Client are denied in their entirety, remain contested, and are connected with ongoing judicial proceedings which have not been finally determined.”

Multiple proceedings continue

The dispute remains unresolved.

Several cases are still pending before courts in Abeokuta and Lagos as both sides continue to await court ruling.

The majority shareholders insist they remain unlawfully excluded from a company in which they hold a controlling stake, while seeking full restoration of their management rights and access to company assets.

Mr Ekweozor told PREMIUM TIMES that it is “deeply concerning that allegations which are hotly disputed and substantially connected with matters pending before the Courts are now being presented to the media as though they have been established facts.”

“Our Client considers this a deliberate attempt to circumvent the judicial process and procure, through publicity, what ought properly to be determined through evidence and due process of law.”

Crown Ceramics Nigeria Limited was registered in 2014 to engage in importing, exporting, manufacturing and general contracting.


Discover more from Premium Times Nigeria

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Trending