Connect with us

News

International Press Centre Trains Journalists to Combat Information Disorder in Democratic Governance Reporting

info

Published

on

International Press Centre training in Kaduna State (9)

The Lagos-based International Press Centre (IPC) conducted a comprehensive training program for 40 journalists aimed at combating information disorder in democratic governance reporting. The two-day workshop took place in Kaduna State on Wednesday, March 6th, and Thursday, March 7th, 2023, drawing participants from nine states across Northern Nigeria.

Journalists from various Northern states, including Abuja, Kaduna, Kastina, Niger, Bauchi, Jigawa, Kano, Plateau, and Benue, participated in the workshop. These journalists, spanning different levels of experience from new to mid-level, community, and freelance journalists, converged to enhance their skills in combating misinformation and promoting transparency in democratic governance reporting.

The workshop, part of the European Union Support to Democratic Governance in Nigeria (EU-SDGN) project, focused on utilizing fact-checking and Freedom of Information (FOI) tools. With the theme “Credible Elections and Democratic Governance: Media Engagement on Using Fact-Checking and FOIA to Combat Information Disorder,” the training underscored the critical role of media engagement in ensuring transparent electoral processes and countering the spread of misleading information.

Stella Nwofia, the Programme Manager of IPC, addressed participants at the training session held at the Bafra International Hotel in Kaduna. She emphasized the significance of the training in addressing the growing threat of misinformation to democratic governance. Nwofia highlighted the training’s alignment with the EU final report of the 2023 general elections, aiming to equip journalists with the necessary tools, skills, and knowledge to navigate the challenges of the digital era while upholding standards of responsibility and ethical behavior.

“This training program is designed as a three-part series to empower journalists nationwide, promote critical thinking, fact verification, and media literacy,” said Ms. Nwofia. “Our goal is to empower journalists to uphold truth, advocate integrity, and safeguard democracy.”

The event featured lecture sessions by distinguished speakers, including Lanre Arogundade, the Executive-Director of IPC, who spoke on the principles of good journalism and the importance of fact-checking. Edetean Ojo, Executive Director of Media Rights Agenda, delivered a lecture on utilizing the FOI Act and investigative methodologies to report on democratic governance and electoral accountability issues.

During the training, participants engaged in practical exercises on information verification and fact-checking under the guidance of Mr. Arogundade. Dr. Fatimah V. Shuaibu from the Department of Mass Communication at Kaduna Polytechnic addressed the gender dimension in combating information disorder, emphasizing the significance of diverse perspectives in media reporting.

Mr. Edetaen Ojo highlighted the essential role of the FOIA in investigative journalism, urging participants to leverage this legislative tool to hold government and corporate bodies accountable.

The training provided by the EU and IPC serves as a critical step in equipping journalists with the skills and knowledge needed to combat fake news and promote accountability in Nigeria. By fostering a culture of transparency and responsible journalism, journalists play a pivotal role in strengthening democracy and ensuring a brighter future for all Nigerians.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Chinese automakers are following Tesla’s bet that robots are the next big profit machine

info

Published

on

By

Xpeng robot Getty.jpg

The hype around humanoid robots isn’t particularly new. Thank Tesla CEO Elon Musk and his Optimus robot, as well as the myriad videos of Boston Dynamics’ Atlas robot, for that.

Behind that hype, though, there is real progress. The physical capabilities of robots continue to improve, and researchers now believe that the AI techniques behind large language models can make complex robots capable of learning nearly any task.

Those tailwinds have encouraged a new batch of companies to jump in on the promise of profits from humanoid robots. And many of the latest entrants are Chinese automakers.

Earlier this week, Xpeng’s robotics unit raised more than $900 million at a post-money valuation of more than $6.3 billion. The round, led by IDG Capital with participation from Gaorong Ventures, Tencent, and Alibaba, was described by the company as the largest single-round private financing ever recorded in China’s “embodied AI” industry (AI systems built directly into physical machines).

This month, AiMOGA, the robotics unit of China’s Chery Automobile, reportedly began preparing for an IPO, while BYD unveiled a humanoid robot called Xiao Di. Other Chinese automakers, including Changan, GAC, Li Auto, SAIC, and Seres, are also developing humanoid robots.

Among all of them, Xpeng is the Chinese automaker that most closely watches and follows Tesla’s initiatives, according to Michael Dunne, CEO of San Diego- and Singapore-based advisory firm Dunne Insights.

“It’s the most focused on autonomy, it’s the first to commit in a big way to humanoid robots,” Dunne told TechCrunch, adding that Xpeng founder He Xiaopeng is a tech billionaire known for his agility and quick adjustments. “He sees razor-thin profit in cars on the near horizon. Robots look much more promising.”

Xiaopeng and Xpeng co-president Brian Gu are bullish enough that they’ve put their own funds behind the robotics unit. According to the Wall Street Journal, the pair invested about $100 million into the recent fundraising round.

Xpeng’s bet is on Iron, a humanoid robot with a realistic human shape that is built for commercial deployment.

Chinese automakers like Xpeng do bring a manufacturing edge.

“They have all the hardware to get the job done,” Dunne said. “Question is if they can catch Tesla on the AI side of the equation.”

There are, of course, many other companies developing humanoid robots, including Agility Robotics, Apptronik, and Figure, all chasing the same goal: commercial deployment at scale.

Hyundai-owned Boston Dynamics is getting closer to that goal. Hyundai plans to bring Boston Dynamics’ Atlas humanoid robot to its Georgia factory this year and eventually deploy the robots for tasks like parts sequencing by 2028. The Korean automaker, which partnered with Google’s AI research lab DeepMind to speed up the development of Atlas, is opening a U.S. facility this year called a Robot Metaplant Application Center, which will teach robots how to map movements like lifts and turns.

Other automotive companies are also jumping, including supplier Mobileye, which acquired humanoid robot startup Mentee Robotics earlier this year for $900 million. Even Rivian is dabbling in robots with its Mind Robotics spinout — although its robots are not expected to look quite like the humanoids in development elsewhere.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Continue Reading

News

2027: Osun outcome tests Nigerians’ resolve against vote buying, electoral manipulation

info

Published

on

By

Vote.jpg

The outcome of the Osun State governorship election has opened up another round of political discourse ahead of the 2027 general elections.

DAILY POST recalls that Governor Ademola Adeleke of the Accord Party won the Osun governorship election after receiving 511,067 votes, while APC’s Bola Oyebamiji garnered 444,815 votes. ADC’s Najeem Salaam finished in third place with 17,180 votes. Adeleke triumphed in 19 of the state’s 30 local government areas, whereas Oyebamiji won in 11.

Political observers are expressing mixed views on whether Nigerians can replicate the resilience demonstrated by residents of Osun in resisting electoral manipulation and financial inducements.

According to the observers, achieving a similar level of resistance nationwide would depend on several factors, particularly stronger grassroots mobilisation and voter awareness. However, they noted that significant structural challenges could still undermine efforts to achieve this.

Recommended

DAILY POST reports that political analysts and civil society organisations have highlighted how high voter turnout and local vigilance effectively countered political intimidation and substantial financial influence.

However, translating a localised dynamic into a nationwide presidential and general election presents unique obstacles.

Nigerians have drawn several lessons from the Osun election, one of which is the “Collect and Vote Your Conscience” strategy.

A significant development in Osun involved voters accepting cash and food items from political representatives while deliberately casting their votes for their preferred candidates. In certain polling units, determined groups actively chased away those attempting to buy votes.

Additionally, the high voter turnout played a crucial role in thwarting electoral fraud.

Osun recorded an impressive turnout of more than 40 per cent. Civil rights experts assert that when citizens flood polling stations in large numbers, it significantly reduces the possibility of result manipulation.

Moreover, DAILY POST reports that the residents did not merely cast their votes and go home. They remained to observe the counting process, recorded the results on their mobile devices and monitored the data to ensure its accuracy before the official collation.

As credit is being attributed to the residents of Osun for their resilience, politicians, particularly those affiliated with the ruling party, contend that Adeleke’s re-election success was merely facilitated by President Bola Tinubu.

To underscore this, Governor Adeleke, shortly after being declared winner of the August 15 election, promptly visited the Presidential Villa, choosing to acknowledge President Tinubu and attribute his victory to the President’s generosity.

Adeleke said that Tinubu guaranteed a fair and equitable electoral environment and conveyed his sincere gratitude to the President for permitting a transparent democratic process in Osun State.

Also, Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, suggested immediately after the election that the outcome was not about Adeleke’s popularity or the will of the people, but simply Tinubu’s wish.

Wike said he would have been in Osun State to help secure victory for the APC if President Bola Tinubu had wanted the party to win the governorship election.

Speaking to DAILY POST on whether Nigerian voters would replicate the resistance shown by voters in Osun, a chieftain of the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, Dr Adetokunbo Pearse, who is also a former governorship candidate and convener of Reset Lagos PDP, warned that Nigerians should expect a repetition of what he described as terrorism carried out by the APC in Osun during the governorship election.

He added that not every state would have the capacity to withstand the APC as Governor Adeleke succeeded in doing in Osun State, adding that the general election would be bloody.

He told DAILY POST: “I believe that the issue of vote buying has never been as effective as most people think. I’ve been in many elections, and I know that in spite of the fact that people are offered money, they usually vote their conscience.

“Most people vote their conscience. Think about this: if it was a question of money, Peter Obi would not have won any state in 2023.

“People wanted to vote out Tinubu in Lagos, and when the presidential election came, people voted against Tinubu in Lagos, and he lost in Lagos.

“Obi had no money; he won in 12 states. So, you know, Nigerians are not as corrupt.

“Nigerian voters are not as gullible and sellable as people think. What usually happens is that the political power has all the machinery to use to force people to vote for them.

“They steal the vote. You know what the former national chairman of the APC, Ganduje, said: ‘We are going to go there and we are going to conquer. We are going to carry it by force.’

“Tinubu himself will say, ‘Take it, grab it, and run away with it.’ Yes, that’s their mantra. They tried it in Osun State. I don’t want people to get something wrong about what happened in Osun. They did it in Osun.

“Otherwise, they would not have had the number of votes they had. They lost by 66,000 votes. They would have lost by 200,000 votes if it was not for the fact that they took an army over there to capture the vote. That’s what happens in our elections.

“So what happened in Osun was that the governorship candidate, the incumbent Governor Adeleke, was able to match them force for force.

“When they brought in machinery, all their big guns with a lot of money, people took the money and people voted for them. Don’t forget that the 66,000-vote difference doesn’t… it’s not the kind of margin that they would have got.

“They would not have got 20 per cent of the votes they got if it wasn’t for the fact that they forced their way through.

“Vote buying, intimidation, rigging, all of it went on in Osun State. So, the lesson from Osun for people is that not only do you vote your conscience, you stay with the vote, you follow the vote all the way from the polling units to the collation centres, and that is what they did in Osun.

“So, we should expect the same thing that happened in Osun to happen in every state in the general election, and that means that the party in power, the APC, as always, will use intimidation, violence and vote buying.

“Not every state can survive like Osun. So, let us not be carried away by what happened in Osun. Not every state has a sitting governor and a Davido and an Adeleke family dynasty, which has a lot of clout.

“So, in spite of the fact that people loved Adeleke and wanted to vote for him, he would have lost, you know, if it was not for the fact that he had a very strong family line.

“Yes, he had a very strong support base from members, friends and so on. So, we have to be very careful. What we saw was frightening. In spite of the victory of the people, I am afraid that 2027 is going to be bloody.”

On her part, the former Country Director of ActionAid Nigeria and a member of the Steering Committee of the Nigerian Civil Society Situation Room, Ene Obi, criticised politicians for exploiting hunger and making financial incentives a significant factor in Nigeria’s elections.

She expressed concern over the lack of arrests for what she termed a disgraceful display at polling units and bribery before or during elections.

She refused to blame citizens for collecting the money, citing the scorching hardship that has further reduced the standard of living of citizens.

However, she called on the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, to provide more privacy at polling stations, which would give voters room to still vote their conscience regardless of whether they had received inducements or not.

She told DAILY POST: “The reality is that INEC must protect citizens because, in some cases, the money is distributed even before they arrive at the polling unit. Voting should be a private matter.

“One notable observation I made in various locations during the Osun 2026 elections was the active involvement of citizens.

“I recall a specific polling unit in Osogbo town, which was considered a red zone. As the voting process was about to commence, one of the party agents pointed out that the placement of the voting cubicle was inappropriate.

“He insisted that the location be changed to ensure the privacy of the voting cubicle. I was pleased to see a young man take on that responsibility, and they successfully relocated the polling unit to a spot where voters could maintain their privacy, which was commendable.

“No one challenged this decision. Thus, safeguarding the voting cubicle equates to safeguarding the votes for Nigeria.

“If voting occurs in privacy and it is not visible to others, what will be the outcome?

“Therefore, we cannot simply condemn individuals who accept money. Naturally, one might question why anyone would accept money or allow their conscience to be bought.

“However, we are conducting this election at a time when over 100 million, and possibly now more than 150 million, individuals live below the poverty line.

“Given this situation, how many people can resist when offered N15,000 in exchange for showing their voter card, especially when they are struggling to find food? People are suffering from hunger, and instead of utilising state resources to support your citizens, which you pledged to protect, you resort to bribery to secure their votes. I believe there is a pressing need for enhanced citizens’ education.

“We need more citizens. Voter education is very, very important. Active citizenship is very important. The lifeblood of democracy is active citizenship. If citizens stop asking, do they think that there are no alternatives?

“Because this cannot go on; we can’t continue to go on like this. What we are seeing now, campaigning has been found, and you are making public servants part of your campaign team.

“You look at the amount of money that they are mentioning, N60 billion or whatever. Why are you weaponising poverty? You are stealing from Nigerians, and you are insulting them by giving them N15,000.

“For four years, you never did anything. You are not making headway with your promises to the people. The easiest way is to use money to buy the conscience of the people. God doesn’t forgive.”

Continue Reading

Trending