Connect with us

News

Governors’ Travel, Office Expenses Hit N512bn

info

Published

on

Incollage 20260814 1904375786728277323084400376 1200x675.jpg

State governments spent at least N512.10 billion on Government Houses, governors’ offices and travel-related expenses in the first half of 2026, according to an analysis of available state budget implementation reports.

The expenditure, drawn from 33 states with usable records, highlights the large amount of public money committed to running the executive offices of state governments, even as governors’ official salaries remain relatively small compared with the overall cost of maintaining their offices.

The N512.10 billion total comprises N420.01 billion spent under Government House, Governor’s Office and related executive administration budget heads, while another N92.09 billion went to travel and transport during the first six months of the year.

By comparison, the official monthly salary of a state governor is N503,000. That amounts to N3.018 million for six months, meaning the combined salary of all 36 governors over the same period would be about N108.65 million.

The comparison shows that the combined six-month salaries of the governors accounted for only about 0.02 per cent of the N512.10 billion identified as spending on executive offices and travel.

The figures, however, do not represent money personally received by governors.

Government House and Governor’s Office expenditure covers a wide range of costs associated with running the executive arm of government, including administrative activities, staff, official residences, utilities, maintenance, protocol, security-related operations and state functions.

Similarly, the travel and transport category covers official local and international trips, transportation and related costs incurred across the wider state public service.

The figures nevertheless provide an indication of the broader cost attached to maintaining the institutions and privileges surrounding the offices occupied by governors.

The analysis was based on first- and second-quarter 2026 Budget Implementation Reports, using the largest identifiable Government House, Governor’s Office or executive administration expenditure line in each state alongside the general travel and transport head.

Complete comparable data were available for Abia, Adamawa, Bauchi, Bayelsa, Borno, Cross River, Ebonyi, Ekiti, Enugu, Gombe, Imo, Jigawa, Kaduna, Kano, Katsina, Kogi, Kwara, Lagos, Nasarawa, Niger, Ogun, Ondo, Oyo, Plateau, Sokoto, Taraba, Yobe and Zamfara. Comparable figures were not available for Edo, Osun and Rivers.

The 2026 spending represents a decline from the corresponding period of 2025 based on the available records. In the first six months of last year, N465.07 billion was recorded under Government House, Governor’s Office and similar executive administration heads, while N92.73 billion went to travel and transport, bringing the combined amount to N557.80 billion.

The 2026 figure was therefore about N45.70 billion lower, representing an 8.19 per cent reduction.

Most of the decline came from Government House and Governor’s Office expenditure, which dropped from N465.07 billion in the first half of 2025 to N420.01 billion in 2026. That represents a reduction of N45.05 billion, or 9.69 per cent.

Spending on travel and transport, however, barely changed. The amount declined from N92.73 billion in the first half of 2025 to N92.09 billion in 2026, a difference of about N643.66 million or 0.69 per cent.

The figures therefore suggest that while some states reduced expenditure associated with Government Houses and executive administration, spending on official movement and transportation remained relatively stable.

A development economist, Aliyu Ilias, said the figures demonstrated why looking only at governors’ basic salaries gave an incomplete picture of the financial cost associated with political offices.

“Ordinarily, anything that has to do with executive office in Nigeria appears to be much more expensive because they actually direct how it works there. And with the docile state assemblies we have, who always concur, it is clear that our democracy is very expensive because of the way we maintain their offices, and that is why it is very juicy,” Punch Newspaper quoted Ilias.

He said the broader benefits and expenses attached to the office should be considered when comparing governors with senior civil servants.

“Some even want to go as far as borrowing money to win an election and, when they enter office, they believe they are going to repay the money. So, it is not correct to say that a Permanent Secretary is earning better than a governor when you isolate the governor’s salary without adding the other travel perks and expenses attached to the office,” he said.

Ilias also criticised the argument that governors are poorly paid based solely on their official salaries.

“The governor just wanted to be sensational. But with the addition you have done, it shows that they are taking the bigger cheque from the spending arising from the high income that the state is generating,” he said.

Kogi State recorded the highest identifiable Government House and Governor’s Office expenditure in the 2026 data, with N65.34 billion spent during the period.

Ogun followed with N45.26 billion, while Lagos recorded N45.04 billion. Kano accounted for N25.87 billion, Ekiti N25.22 billion and Cross River N23.92 billion.

Bayelsa recorded N22.99 billion, Imo N19.43 billion and Enugu N16.20 billion.

At the other end of the available figures, Oyo recorded about N1.95 billion under the relevant executive expenditure head, followed by Sokoto with N2.20 billion, Kwara with N2.59 billion and Abia with N2.78 billion.

Kogi’s N65.34 billion represented more than 15 per cent of the identifiable Government House and Governor’s Office spending captured in the dataset.

The pattern was different when travel and transport expenditure was examined.

Plateau recorded the highest identifiable spending in that category, with N10.11 billion during the first six months of 2026. Lagos followed with N8.23 billion, while Taraba recorded N5.16 billion.

Niger spent N4.45 billion, Ekiti N4.41 billion and Bauchi N3.75 billion. Yobe recorded N3.68 billion.

Oyo was among the states with the lowest identifiable travel and transport expenditure at N667.52 million, while Kano recorded N626.95 million.

There were also significant differences in spending patterns between states when the 2025 and 2026 figures were compared.

Kogi’s Government House and Governor’s Office expenditure rose from N51.99 billion in the first half of 2025 to N65.34 billion in 2026, an increase of about N13.34 billion or 25.66 per cent.

Bayelsa recorded an increase from N14.48 billion to N22.99 billion, representing a rise of N8.51 billion or 58.75 per cent.

Cross River recorded one of the sharpest increases, with spending rising from N9.91 billion to N23.92 billion, an increase of about N14.01 billion or 141.37 per cent.

Lagos also recorded a major increase, moving from N25.86 billion in the first half of 2025 to N45.04 billion in 2026. That represents an increase of about N19.18 billion or 74.16 per cent.

Other states recorded reductions. Ogun’s spending under the relevant Government House and Governor’s Office head fell from N49.83 billion in 2025 to N45.26 billion in 2026, a decline of N4.57 billion or 9.17 per cent.

Kano’s expenditure also fell from N28.84 billion to N25.87 billion, representing a reduction of about N2.98 billion or 10.32 per cent.

Niger, however, recorded an increase from N13.13 billion to N14.15 billion, representing a rise of about N1.02 billion or 7.74 per cent.

The spending comes amid continuing discussions about the remuneration of political office holders in Nigeria.

The Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission is constitutionally responsible for determining the remuneration of governors and other political office holders. The existing remuneration structure remains in place while a broader review is being considered by the relevant authorities.

RMAFC has recently said its review of the remuneration of executive and legislative office holders had reached an advanced stage, with proposed legislation expected to be presented to the National Assembly.

The level of state spending is also coming under greater scrutiny as governments receive increased allocations from the Federation Account following economic reforms implemented by the Federal Government.

Available Ministry of Finance data previously showed that N47.25 trillion was distributed through the Federation Account between 2023 and 2025. That amount represented more than half of the N93.13 trillion shared across the nine-year period from 2017 to 2025.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

‘I have a duty to serve Nigeria, and I will’ — Adesina tells Tinubu

info

Published

on

GurexoZX0AAjYJc.jpeg

Former President of the African Development Bank (AfDB), Akinwumi Adesina, has declared his readiness to serve Nigeria in any capacity, saying he has a duty and responsibility to contribute to the country’s development.

Mr Adesina made the declaration on Tuesday after meeting President Bola Tinubu at the Presidential Villa in Abuja, where he briefed the president on his 10-year tenure at the continental development finance institution.

“I’m fully able to help Nigeria in any capacity. I’ve always had that. You know, my heart is always at home,” he told journalists after the meeting.

Asked what role he could play, Mr Adesina said he would help in any capacity the president considered appropriate, but stressed he was not seeking a government appointment.

“I’m not looking for a job. I’m not looking for anything. I’m just here to help. It’s my country. I have a duty, an obligation, and a responsibility to do so, and I will,” he said.

There was no announcement of a specific role or appointment for the former AfDB president following the meeting.

PT WHATSAPP CHANNEL
Dangote Refinery AD

Adesina’s record in agriculture and development finance

Mr Adesina, an agricultural economist, served as Nigeria’s minister of agriculture and rural development from 2011 to 2015 under former President Goodluck Jonathan before becoming the first Nigerian to lead the AfDB.

He was elected president of the bank in May 2015 and re-elected for a second five-year term in August 2020. His tenure ended in 2025.

As agriculture minister, he championed reforms to the distribution of subsidised farm inputs, including an electronic-wallet system that let farmers receive support for seeds and fertiliser via mobile phones.

The AfDB said the programme reached 15 million farmers within its first four years. The initiative was intended to improve access to agricultural inputs while reducing the role of intermediaries in their distribution.

At the AfDB, Mr Adesina oversaw the institution’s development agenda, which included expanding electricity access, improving food security, industrialising African economies, promoting regional integration and improving living standards.

During his leadership, the bank’s general capital increased from $93 billion to $208 billion in 2019, following a decision by its shareholders, the largest capital increase in the institution’s history at the time.

AfDB provided $7 billion to Nigeria in 10 years

At the meeting, Mr Adesina said the AfDB provided about $7 billion in financing to Nigeria between 2015 and 2025.

He compared this with the $11.1 billion in cumulative financing the bank had provided to Nigeria since it began operations in the country in 1971.

“Within 10 years, we were able to do 63 per cent, literally, of that,” he said, adding that President Tinubu was pleased with the bank’s support to Nigeria during his tenure.

Mr Adesina said he used the meeting to commend the president for his economic reforms, particularly the removal of the petrol subsidy and the harmonisation of the foreign exchange windows.

He described the measures as difficult but said they were beginning to produce results.

He cited increased foreign exchange availability, the return of portfolio investors and a downward trend in inflation as signs of progress. However, he acknowledged that prices remained high for Nigerians.

He also pointed to improved assessments of Nigeria by some international rating agencies, saying the country’s outlook had shifted towards stable or positive assessments.

The comments come amid ongoing debate over the impact of the Tinubu administration’s economic reforms, including higher fuel costs after the removal of the petrol subsidy and changes to the foreign exchange market.

Although the government has defended the measures as necessary to stabilise the economy, the higher cost of living has continued to put pressure on households and businesses.

From economic stabilisation to growth

Mr Adesina said stabilising the economy was only the beginning, arguing that Nigeria must now focus on structural transformation, economic growth and prosperity.

He said President Tinubu recognised the need to move beyond macroeconomic reforms and address the broader challenge of transforming the economy.

“I told the president, I’m back at home, here to help and ready to help. It’s my country. I love my country, and I’m ready to help,” he said.

His offer comes after a decade leading one of Africa’s major development finance institutions, a period during which the bank financed projects and programmes across sectors including agriculture, energy, transport and infrastructure.

READ AlSO: ‘I will forever miss you’ – Toluwanisings’ wife breaks down in tears at night of tributes

Mr Adesina’s meeting with the president also gave him an opportunity to formally brief the president on the completion of his two terms and the achievements recorded during his leadership of the bank.

He said he was honoured to have been received by the president and was pleased with the report he presented.

While Mr Adesina did not specify how he might contribute to Nigeria’s development, he said he was prepared to do so whenever the president believed his experience could be useful.

“It’s my country. I have a duty, an obligation, and a responsibility to do so, and I will,” he said.


Discover more from Premium Times Nigeria

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

News

MTN Challenges Nigerians: Compare our data prices with Kenya, South Africa, Zimbabwe – Technology Times

info

Published

on

MTN Nigeria has challenged Nigerians to compare mobile data prices with those in other African countries before concluding that internet access is more expensive in Nigeria, as the nation’s leading mobile operator pushes back against persistent complaints over the cost and rapid depletion of data bundles.

Karl Toriola, CEO of MTN Nigeria, said consumers should examine the prices of comparable data bundles in Kenya, South Africa and Zimbabwe before reaching their own conclusions about the affordability of mobile internet services in Nigeria.

Speaking on Monday at MTN’s Data on Trial event held in Abuja, Toriola urged consumers to visit the websites of telecoms operators in those countries, including Safaricom in Kenya, Vodacom in South Africa and Econet in Zimbabwe, to compare the cost of different data packages.

mtn-nigeria-ceo-tasks-nigerians-on-data-prices
Karl Toriola, CEO of  MTN Nigeria⁠.

“Don’t trust me. Go to other African countries before you get to Europe and check for the price of 1GB, 5GB, 10GB of data yourself and form your own opinion around it,” he said. The MTN Nigeria CEO challenge comes amid continuing public concerns about the affordability of mobile internet access and complaints from subscribers who say their data allowances disappear faster than expected, sometimes when they believe they have barely used their phones.

MTN Nigeria CEO wants consumers to examine comparable information on mobile internet costs 

He specifically encouraged Nigerians to examine 1GB, 5GB, 10GB and 20GB bundles rather than rely on general perceptions about the cost of internet access. “The perception that data in Nigeria is expensive is wrong,” Toriola said.

The MTN Nigeria chief executive said the exercise would allow consumers to assess the company’s position using comparable information rather than simply accepting its claims without verification.

“Don’t trust me. Go to other African countries before you get to Europe and check for the price of 1GB, 5GB, 10GB of data yourself and form your own opinion around it,” he said.

The MTN Nigeria CEO challenge comes amid continuing public concerns about the affordability of mobile internet access and complaints from subscribers who say their data allowances disappear faster than expected, sometimes when they believe they have barely used their phones.

MTN points to Nigeria’s high telecom operating costs

Toriola argued that the cost of operating telecoms infrastructure in Nigeria should be taken into account when comparing local data prices with those in other markets.

According to him, Nigerian operators face substantial expenses providing electricity and transmission services to network sites, with diesel costs adding to the financial burden of maintaining reliable connectivity.

He said these operating conditions differ from those in European countries that are sometimes used as benchmarks for comparing mobile data prices.

Toriola disclosed that MTN spent about N1.05 trillion on power in the previous year, before a subsequent increase in diesel prices linked to the crisis around the Strait of Hormuz.

“We spent about 1.05 trillion Naira last year on power only,” he said. The figure highlights the energy costs MTN says contribute to the expense of running its telecoms infrastructure in Nigeria.

Toriola also said Nigerian operators purchase network equipment supporting fourth-generation (4G) and fifth-generation (5G) services from international suppliers using the same foreign currencies as operators in other markets.

He further pointed to the technology underpinning telecoms billing systems, saying MTN uses Ericsson as its billing system vendor, with similar systems deployed by operators in Western markets.

However, Toriola added, comparing advertised data prices across countries requires more than looking at the headline cost of a bundle. Bundle sizes, validity periods, taxes, exchange rates, average incomes and purchasing power can all affect the relative affordability of internet access.

A lower or higher advertised price alone, therefore, would not establish how much of their income consumers in different countries must spend to remain connected.

Why MTN says data bundles can disappear quickly

MTN’s defence of its pricing was accompanied by explanations from its network and information technology executives about how smartphone settings, video streaming and background applications can contribute to data consumption.

Michael Ndukwe, General Manager, Network Performance and Quality Assurance at MTN, said the growing use of social media and video-based applications has increased demand for mobile data.

He cited figures showing that Nigeria recorded 13.2 million terabytes of data traffic in 2025, while 8.52 million terabytes were recorded in the first half of 2026. Ndukwe described the figures as representing roughly 43% year-on-year growth, although the comparison period for that calculation was not specified in the presentation.

He identified TikTok, YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and X among the major social media platforms contributing to data usage in Nigeria.

According to him, the amount of data consumed when watching videos depends significantly on their resolution.

He said a 15-second TikTok video can consume approximately two to three megabytes in standard definition, while the same video could use as much as 15 megabytes in high definition. Automatic playback can also increase consumption because another video may begin loading as soon as the previous one finishes.

WhatsApp users may also consume substantial amounts of data through status videos, automatically downloaded media, files shared in groups and chat backups to cloud storage, Ndukwe said. 

He advised subscribers to disable automatic media downloads where appropriate, reduce video quality and restrict backups to Wi-Fi networks to avoid unnecessary mobile data consumption.

MTN tells subscribers to monitor their data

Toriola said MTN’s Data on Trial initiative is intended to help customers understand their consumption patterns and examine complaints about disappearing data bundles. He recounted an instance involving a senior MTN employee who suspected the company was taking her data after a large quantity disappeared overnight.

According to Toriola, an examination of the employee’s phone revealed that WhatsApp was backing up data every night. The incident, he said, illustrates how background activity can consume substantial amounts of data without users being fully aware of it.

David Ogunshola, General Manager of IT Operations at MTN Nigeria, also explained that figures displayed on smartphones may differ from network records because devices and telecoms networks can measure or present data consumption differently.

MTN recommends that subscribers use the MyMTN app to monitor real-time data usage and alerts, alongside the data-management tools available on their smartphones.

The operator also promotes its fibre broadband service, MTN FiberX, as an option for customers with high data requirements.

While these measures could help subscribers identify sources of data consumption, the explanations do not independently establish whether every customer complaint about data billing is justified. For consumers, the central questions remain whether the data deducted corresponds accurately with their usage and whether available bundles provide reasonable value for money.

MTN’s challenge to Nigerians to compare prices across African markets has therefore placed its affordability claim up for public scrutiny. For such a comparison to be meaningful, consumers would need to examine equivalent bundles, validity periods, taxes and purchasing power across the different markets.

The debate is consequently no longer only about how much a gigabyte costs. For millions of Nigerian subscribers, the bigger question is how much useful connectivity they actually get for the money they spend.

Continue Reading

Trending