News

Court Sentences Trader for Scammer Money Alerts in Jos Plateau

Published

3 years ago

August 14, 2023

vicky

Samuel Jigede, a 35-year-old trader, has found himself behind bars in Jos, Plateau State, following a recent ruling by a Jos Magistrates’ Court. Jigede has been handed a four-month prison sentence for perpetrating a scam involving counterfeit alerts following the purchase of goods.

In a swift and decisive legal proceeding, Magistrate Shawomi Bokkos delivered the verdict on Friday, ultimately finding Jigede guilty of his actions. Acknowledging his guilt, Jigede was sentenced to four months in prison. However, Magistrate Bokkos presented an alternative: Jigede could opt to pay a fine of his choosing along with a compensation fee amounting to N15,000. In this scenario, he would serve three months in confinement.

Magistrate Bokkos underscored the significance of the penalty as a deterrent against potential future offenders, affirming that such measures were essential to upholding the integrity of the legal system and maintaining societal trust.

The case was brought to the court’s attention on July 11 by Uzochukwu Nwakasi, the complainant, who reported the fraudulent activities to the ‘C’ Division Police Station in Jos. The prosecution, led by Insp Ibrahim Gokwat, meticulously presented evidence detailing Jigede’s deceitful tactics. The court learned that Jigede had purchased goods and proceeded to issue fraudulent payment alerts to unsuspecting sellers. His fraudulent actions were promptly uncovered and reported, leading to the initiation of legal proceedings.

The charges pressed against Jigede fall under the purview of the Plateau State Penal Code Law, underlining the gravity of his actions. This court decision serves as a significant reminder of the consequences that await individuals who engage in fraudulent activities, further solidifying the importance of accountability and transparency within commercial transactions.

The Magistrates’ Court ruling stands as a testament to the justice system’s resolve to preserve the sanctity of trade and ensure that perpetrators of fraudulent acts are held accountable for their actions. This verdict sends a clear message that such practices will not be tolerated, setting a precedent for ethical conduct within the commercial landscape.

Related Topics:Court Sentences Trader for Scammer Money Alerts in Jos Plateau

Up Next

2023 Int’l Youths’ Day: Gov. Mutfwang assures Plateau youths of inclusive governance

Don't Miss

New Commissioner of Police Assumes Office in Plateau State

Click to comment

Health

Ebola: Swiss woman evacuated from Nigeria discharged after recovery

Published

2 hours ago

November 13, 2026

PlateauReports

The woman who tested positive for Ebola in Nigeria and was evacuated to Switzerland for treatment has been discharged from hospital after making a full recovery.

She was discharged from Geneva University Hospitals on Wednesday, after medical personnel confirmed her recovery, Reuters reported on Thursday, quoting a statement from the hospital.

“After the medical team confirmed her full recovery, the cantonal physician authorised the patient being treated for Ebola virus disease to leave the Geneva University Hospitals (HUG) on 11 November 2026,” the hospital said.

The Uganda-born woman and her husband, a Swiss diplomat, were evacuated from Nigeria to Switzerland on 26 October. Her evacuation was confirmed by the Minister of Health and Social Welfare, Muhammad Pate.

The patient had returned to Abuja from Uganda on 3 October. She developed symptoms days later and was admitted to a private health facility before the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (NCDC) was notified. Laboratory tests confirmed the infection on 20 October.

Nigeria continues Ebola surveillance

The NCDC’s latest Ebola situation dashboard, updated on 12 November with data as of 11 November, lists one confirmed case, no deaths and seven negative cases.

It also shows that 62 contacts linked to the confirmed case have been identified. Of these, 52 have completed their mandatory 21-day follow-up, while 10 remain under monitoring.

The NCDC said its response includes contact tracing, investigation of reported alerts, laboratory testing, infection prevention and control measures, and surveillance at the country’s points of entry.

On 11 November, NCDC disclosed that Nigeria recorded no additional confirmed Ebola cases since the imported infection was confirmed.

The agency has urged healthcare workers to remain vigilant, ask patients about their travel and exposure histories, and promptly report suspected cases to public health authorities.

READ ALSO: Ebola: Nigeria records no new cases 21 days after imported infection – NCDC

Regional outbreak continues

The situation in Nigeria is part of a wider outbreak of Bundibugyo virus disease affecting parts of Africa.

In its latest situation update published on 6 November, the World Health Organisation (WHO) said the DRC had recorded 10,668 confirmed cases and 5,198 deaths as of 3 November, across 67 health zones in eight provinces.

Kenya had recorded nine confirmed cases and two deaths, while Nigeria had reported one imported case. WHO said there had been no new confirmed cases in Kenya or Nigeria since its previous update.

Discover more from Premium Times Nigeria

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

News

‘INEC must explain why ADC judgment is being ignored’ — Atiku’s aide demands answers from Amupitan

Published

3 hours ago

November 13, 2026

PlateauReports

Paul Ibe, media aide to the presidential candidate of the African Democratic Congress, ADC, Atiku Abubakar, has challenged the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, to explain why it has yet to clarify its position on a Federal High Court judgment upholding the David Mark-led ADC leadership, despite its assurance that it would obey court orders ahead of the 2027 presidential election.

Ibe’s reaction followed INEC Chairman, Professor Joash Amupitan’s statement that the commission would comply with court decisions concerning Atiku’s participation in the 2027 presidential race.

In a statement on X, while describing obedience to court orders as a legal duty, Ibe argued that the chairman’s assurance left unanswered questions about a July 2, 2026 judgment delivered by Justice Musa Liman, which upheld the emergence of the David Mark-led ADC leadership.

He questioned whether the judgment had been set aside and demanded that INEC identify the specific orders it considers binding, particularly those affecting the ADC leadership and its candidates.

“INEC therefore owes Nigerians a clear explanation of how it intends to reconcile the two decisions—not merely a general declaration that it will obey the judiciary,” Ibe said.

He maintained that his demand was not for INEC to disregard any court ruling but for the commission to account for both judgments and leave any conflict between them to the appropriate appellate court.

Ibe warned against what he described as selective treatment of court decisions, insisting that judgments favourable to the opposition should receive the same consideration as those that do not.

“INEC must demonstrate that its guiding principle is the law—not the political convenience of the outcome,” he added.

‘INEC must explain why ADC judgment is being ignored’ — Atiku’s aide demands answers from Amupitan