Nigeria’s decision to evacuate its confirmed Ebola patient to Switzerland was based on diplomatic considerations, human rights and international health regulations, the Director-General of the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (NCDC), Jide Idris, has revealed.

Speaking on Channels Television’s Politics Today on Monday, Mr Idris said the federal government approved the transfer after consultations with the Coordinating Minister of Health and Social Welfare, Muhammad Pate, and assurances that adequate infection prevention measures would be maintained throughout the journey.

The clarification follows an earlier report that the patient, a woman who is the wife of a Swiss diplomat in Nigeria, was evacuated through the private jet wing of the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport in Abuja.

Mr Idris dismissed suggestions that the government had secretly removed the patient from Nigeria, saying the evacuation followed a formal request from the Swiss Embassy.

“I won’t use the word ‘snuck out’. That’s a no-brainer. It is the first time something like that has happened,” he said.

He said the government weighed the implications of the transfer for public health, international health regulations and the patient’s rights before granting approval.

According to him, officials ensured that infection prevention and control protocols were followed from the hospital where the patient was receiving treatment to the aircraft that transported her.

Patient remains positive

Mr Idris said the patient had tested positive twice before her evacuation, explaining that improvements in her clinical condition did not necessarily mean she had cleared the virus.

He commended the Nigerian medical team for stabilising her condition, which he said had deteriorated to the point of multiple organ failure.

“There are no drugs to deal with this virus,” Mr Idris said, referring to the absence of an established antiviral treatment specifically targeting the Bundibugyo virus responsible for the current outbreak.

Mr Pate earlier confirmed that Nigeria’s Ebola patient and her husband arrived safely in Switzerland on Monday following their medical evacuation from Abuja.

In an update posted on his official X account, Mr Pate said the patient was receiving treatment at Geneva University Hospitals, while her husband had been placed in isolation at University Hospital Zurich.

“The Swiss authorities have confirmed that the patient and her spouse arrived safely in Switzerland today,” he said.

Previous development

Nigeria confirmed its first Ebola case on 20 October, after a 42-year-old Ugandan-born woman living in Abuja tested positive for the disease.

The patient had returned to Nigeria on 3 October after travelling to Uganda and developed symptoms few days later.

She was subsequently admitted to a health facility in Abuja, where she received treatment in isolation before her evacuation to Switzerland on Monday.

Following her evacuation, the World Health Organisation (WHO) said Nigeria had no active confirmed Ebola cases, although contact monitoring and other containment measures were continuing.

The WHO said Nigeria was continuing to monitor 52 contacts, while Switzerland had taken responsibility for the patient’s care and monitoring her husband, who was among the 53 contacts previously identified.

The NCDC had earlier identified 53 primary contacts linked to the confirmed case, including healthcare workers, the patient’s husband, domestic staff and personnel involved in collecting samples.

Health authorities are monitoring the contacts for possible symptoms to detect any additional infections and prevent further transmission.

Mr Pate had earlier said Nigeria could declare the Ebola outbreak over as early as 7 December if no further confirmed or probable cases were detected.

Caution

Mr Idris urged Nigerians to maintain good hand hygiene and exercise caution during mass gatherings, particularly where close physical contact could occur.

He said handwashing could reduce the spread of several infectious diseases, while recommending measures to limit unnecessary physical contact in crowded settings.

However, he stressed that Ebola is not airborne. The virus spreads primarily through direct contact with the blood or other bodily fluids of an infected person, or with contaminated materials.

He advised people who develop symptoms consistent with Ebola, particularly after contact with a suspected or confirmed case, to seek prompt medical guidance.

Mr Idris also cautioned against relying on herbal mixtures to prevent or cure the disease, saying there was no established evidence that such preparations could prevent or treat Ebola. He warned that some herbal products could also cause harmful side effects.

The Department of State Services (DSS) has arraigned Sanusi Dankaka before a Federal High Court in Abuja over allegations that he threatened to release nude photographs and videos of Kano State Governor Abba Yusuf on Facebook.

Dankaka was brought before Justice Salim Ibrahim on Monday to answer a two-count charge relating to alleged cybercrime offences. He pleaded not guilty to both counts.

Following his plea, the court ordered that he be remanded at the Kuje Correctional Centre in Abuja pending the commencement of his trial.

The case centres on allegations that Dankaka used his Facebook account, identified as Sanusi Dankaka Yahaya, to claim that he possessed nude photographs and videos of Governor Yusuf and threatened to make them public.

The DSS accused the defendant of publishing the alleged content in October 2026. The agency also alleged that other individuals, who have not been identified and remain at large, were involved in the alleged offences.

According to the charge sheet, the prosecution considers the alleged publications to be unlawful under the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) Act, 2015, as amended.

The charge, marked FHC/ABJ/CR/699/2026, was filed on October 22 by the DSS prosecutor, Yusuf Afegbua.

In the first count, the agency alleged that Dankaka and others still at large used his Facebook page to publish malicious content while in Jos North Local Government Area of Plateau State.

The prosecution said the defendant claimed to have nude videos and photographs of the Kano governor and threatened to release them to the public.

It argued that the alleged conduct amounted to an offence under Section 27(1)(b) of the Cybercrimes Act, punishable under Section 24(1) of the same law.

The second count focused on the alleged circulation of the same claims on Facebook.

The DSS accused Dankaka of knowingly publishing false information with the intention of causing annoyance, inconvenience, insult and injury to the governor’s person and reputation.

The agency said the alleged act was contrary to and punishable under Section 24(1) of the Cybercrimes Act, as amended.

However, the allegations have not been established in court. Dankaka pleaded not guilty, and the prosecution is expected to present its evidence during the trial.

When the matter was called on Monday, Afegbua informed the court that the case was scheduled for arraignment and that the prosecution was prepared to proceed.

The defendant’s lawyer, Kauna Penzin, also confirmed her readiness to proceed with the matter.

After the charges were read to Dankaka, he entered his plea of not guilty to both counts. The prosecution then requested a trial date to enable it to prove the allegations against him.

Afegbua also asked the court to order the defendant’s remand at the Kuje Correctional Centre pending further proceedings. Penzin did not oppose the application.

Justice Ibrahim subsequently granted the request and adjourned the case until December 7 for the commencement of trial.

The remand order means Dankaka will remain in custody pending further proceedings, subject to any subsequent order of the court.

The next stage of the case is expected to focus on the prosecution’s evidence regarding the alleged Facebook publications, the claims made against the governor and the circumstances surrounding the reported threat to release the purported photographs and videos.

The court will also have to consider the evidence presented in support of the charges before determining whether the prosecution has established the alleged offences.

The DSS will have the opportunity to present its case when proceedings begin on December 7, while the defence will be able to challenge the prosecution’s evidence.

The court’s decision to remand the defendant does not amount to a finding of guilt. The final determination will depend on the evidence and arguments presented during the trial.